So you’re basically a dishonest piece of shit.
I’ve never called for the abolution of the electoral college.
That being said, I have applied reason to the electoral college and said that the President Elect needs to win both the majority of the electoral college as well as a plurality of the popular votes. Its the only elected office in the nation where the total number of constituents of the office holder do not get to weigh in on who wins the election. That should change. I also think it’s criminally insane that we have an even number of electors seeing as how nearly every election. The last time a 3rd party got any electoral votes was 1968 (one of 3 times in the 1900’s where a 3rd party got any EVs ). Its long past time to make it an odd number just to avoid a tie.
But if the question is the have EITHER the electoral college as it is or a straight popular vote decide the president elect...I’ll stick with the electoral college as it is; win or lose. And I think we could all agree that a straight popular vote of the entire nation would radically benefit the Democratic Party at this juncture in history. So feel free to shove your argument all the way up your cavernous ass.