POLL: Will Trump Prosecute Hillary Clinton?...

[Norman]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Most likely not directly... but it's dumb to pretend that there are no consequences.

 

[Spare_change]

Nothing would divide the country more than continuing to go after the oppositions candidate.

You're right ... let the criminals roam free.

 

[francoHFW]

OP- Not a chance in the world, dupes. D'OH!!

 

[Meathead]

No. He will be magnanimous in victory. He has more important issues to deal with. That, of course, is not to say she shouldn't be.

 

[paulitician]

Good question, but I don't think he will.

But that's not the real question. Will he pardon her .... THAT is the question.

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

Then why is your boy Hussein considering it? Maybe you should give em a call and impart your 'wisdom' on him. Think he'll take your call? Think again.

Once again, like the whole premise of this thread ------ strawmen aren't real.

Your thread is dead. It was DOA.
I'm sorry, we did everything we could. It's in a better place now.

Well, you go ahead and give your boy Hussein a call. Because he is considering a Clinton Pardon. You and him need to hash it out. Good luck with that.

Again for the slower kids --- there can be no "pardon" where there was no "conviction".
And in turn there can be no "conviction" where there was no "prosecution", and to return to the beginning, there can be no "prosecution" where there was no "crime". All of which is why your entire "poll" is inoperative.

What you're describing is not the legal process of indictment > prosecution > conviction anyway. What you're describing is getting rid of political opponents by tossing them in jail. What you're calling for is political prisoners.

And that speaks volumes about who you are. Even more, I'd say, than your exhortations to "grab some *****".

Again, take it up with your boy Hussein. He's the one considering the Clinton Pardon. Looks like you and him have a strong disagreement over this one. You should call Hussein and see if he'll invite you to the White House. Maybe then y'all can work out your differences.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Will Trump Prosecute Hillary Clinton?... He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Good question, but I don't think he will.

But that's not the real question. Will he pardon her .... THAT is the question.

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

WRONG! Do some research before you post, otherwise people might mistake you for an ignorant liberal.

 

[bodecea]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Drumpf said a lot of things....I hope you are able to get used to disappointment.

 

[paulitician]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Drumpf said a lot of things....I hope you are able to get used to disappointment.

I actually won't be disappointed. Hillary Clinton is all done. I'm a decent compassionate person. She's a very ill corrupt old lady. I'm ok with not jailing her. She's already in a jail of sorts.

Clinton's a very bad person, and she knows it. And she will never be the US President. Living the rest of her life with those two realities, will be enough punishment for her. I'll settle with that as being at least some justice.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Drumpf said a lot of things....I hope you are able to get used to disappointment.

Conservatives are used to it, they have dealt with it the last 8 years.

 

[GLASNOST]

I actually won't be disappointed. Hillary Clinton is all done. I'm a decent compassionate person. She's a very ill corrupt old lady. I'm ok with not jailing her. She's already in a jail of sorts.

Clinton's a very bad person, and she knows it. And she will never be the US President. Living the rest of her life with those two realities, will be enough punishment for her. I'll settle with that as being at least some justice.

An interesting observation, particularly >>>>>>>>

She's already in a jail of sorts.

.... but still, I'd love to see her, Bush Baby, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and maybe Obama behind bars for a very long time.

 

[Toro]

No, of course not.

And his worshippers will be on here arguing why not prosecuting Clinton is good for America.

 

[GLASNOST]

No, of course not.

And his worshippers will be on here arguing why not prosecuting Clinton is good for America.

No doubt, you're right
.

 

[Silhouette]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

No, malignant narsos only beat their victim until they submit. She's lost so his game worked. No reason to waste another nanosecond on false outrage..

 

[paulitician]

I

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

No, malignant narsos only beat their victim until they submit. She's lost so his game worked. No reason to waste another nanosecond on false outrage..

I hear ya, you're still pretty butt-hurt. Come back when you're over your loss. You'll be more reasonable. Take care.

 

[Pogo]

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

Then why is your boy Hussein considering it? Maybe you should give em a call and impart your 'wisdom' on him. Think he'll take your call? Think again.

Once again, like the whole premise of this thread ------ strawmen aren't real.

Your thread is dead. It was DOA.
I'm sorry, we did everything we could. It's in a better place now.

Well, you go ahead and give your boy Hussein a call. Because he is considering a Clinton Pardon. You and him need to hash it out. Good luck with that.

Again for the slower kids --- there can be no "pardon" where there was no "conviction".
And in turn there can be no "conviction" where there was no "prosecution", and to return to the beginning, there can be no "prosecution" where there was no "crime". All of which is why your entire "poll" is inoperative.

What you're describing is not the legal process of indictment > prosecution > conviction anyway. What you're describing is getting rid of political opponents by tossing them in jail. What you're calling for is political prisoners.

And that speaks volumes about who you are. Even more, I'd say, than your exhortations to "grab some *****".

Again, take it up with your boy Hussein. He's the one considering the Clinton Pardon. Looks like you and him have a strong disagreement over this one. You should call Hussein and see if he'll invite you to the White House. Maybe then y'all can work out your differences.

Again, it's cute how you give your strawman a name, even if "Hussein" might be an unexpected one.

But strawman it still is. Not interested. The fact remains what you're suggesting is the same as a Fidel Castro or a Dim Dung Eel or a Hitler tossing people in the klink because you see them as a threat. You have no crime to prosecute.

Which, as I said, speaks volumes about you.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Will Trump Prosecute Hillary Clinton?... He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Good question, but I don't think he will.

But that's not the real question. Will he pardon her .... THAT is the question.

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

Wrong.

 

[Pogo]

Will Trump Prosecute Hillary Clinton?... He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Good question, but I don't think he will.

But that's not the real question. Will he pardon her .... THAT is the question.

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

WRONG! Do some research before you post, otherwise people might mistake you for an ignorant liberal.

Funny you can't refute it then.

I cannot "pardon" you for cutting me off in traffic yesterday. Not because I don't feel like pardoning you but because such an incident never happened. Ergo there's nothing to hand a pardon ON. Pardons don't just waft through the air like mushroom spores.

This doesn't really go any more basic on the basic scale. We've got the basic dial set to "zero".

Off the topic anyway. Dim Dong the OP wants to "prosecute" people without a crime. That can't be done either. If you don't like how the law works -- oh well.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Good question, but I don't think he will.

But that's not the real question. Will he pardon her .... THAT is the question.

You do understand that before a "pardon" can exist --- both a "crime" and a "conviction" have to exist, right?

"Pardon" is not a Saturday Night Live announcer.

Then why is your boy Hussein considering it? Maybe you should give em a call and impart your 'wisdom' on him. Think he'll take your call? Think again.

Once again, like the whole premise of this thread ------ strawmen aren't real.

Your thread is dead. It was DOA.
I'm sorry, we did everything we could. It's in a better place now.

Well, you go ahead and give your boy Hussein a call. Because he is considering a Clinton Pardon. You and him need to hash it out. Good luck with that.

Again for the slower kids --- there can be no "pardon" where there was no "conviction".
And in turn there can be no "conviction" where there was no "prosecution", and to return to the beginning, there can be no "prosecution" where there was no "crime". All of which is why your entire "poll" is inoperative.

What you're describing is not the legal process of indictment > prosecution > conviction anyway. What you're describing is getting rid of political opponents by tossing them in jail. What you're calling for is political prisoners.

And that speaks volumes about who you are. Even more, I'd say, than your exhortations to "grab some *****".

Again for the slower kids --- there can be no "pardon" where there was no "conviction".

Repeat your error, it's funnier the second time.

 

[paulitician]

Then why is your boy Hussein considering it? Maybe you should give em a call and impart your 'wisdom' on him. Think he'll take your call? Think again.

Once again, like the whole premise of this thread ------ strawmen aren't real.

Your thread is dead. It was DOA.
I'm sorry, we did everything we could. It's in a better place now.

Well, you go ahead and give your boy Hussein a call. Because he is considering a Clinton Pardon. You and him need to hash it out. Good luck with that.

Again for the slower kids --- there can be no "pardon" where there was no "conviction".
And in turn there can be no "conviction" where there was no "prosecution", and to return to the beginning, there can be no "prosecution" where there was no "crime". All of which is why your entire "poll" is inoperative.

What you're describing is not the legal process of indictment > prosecution > conviction anyway. What you're describing is getting rid of political opponents by tossing them in jail. What you're calling for is political prisoners.

And that speaks volumes about who you are. Even more, I'd say, than your exhortations to "grab some *****".

Again, take it up with your boy Hussein. He's the one considering the Clinton Pardon. Looks like you and him have a strong disagreement over this one. You should call Hussein and see if he'll invite you to the White House. Maybe then y'all can work out your differences.

Again, it's cute how you give your strawman a name, even if "Hussein" might be an unexpected one.

But strawman it still is. Not interested. The fact remains what you're suggesting is the same as a Fidel Castro or a Dim Dung Eel or a Hitler tossing people in the klink because you see them as a threat. You have no crime to prosecute.

Which, as I said, speaks volumes about you.

So you vote no. SHEESH! Why didn't you just say that?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

He has indicated that he is going to pursue criminal prosecution of Hillary Clinton. Do you think it'll happen?

Drumpf said a lot of things....I hope you are able to get used to disappointment.

I actually won't be disappointed. Hillary Clinton is all done. I'm a decent compassionate person. She's a very ill corrupt old lady. I'm ok with not jailing her. She's already in a jail of sorts.

Clinton's a very bad person, and she knows it. And she will never be the US President. Living the rest of her life with those two realities, will be enough punishment for her. I'll settle with that as being at least some justice.

Rejected by her husband, in favor of hundreds of other women, rejected by the Democrats, in favor of an unqualified, first term Senator, rejected by the electorate, in favor of Trump.
She won't last long. Gin doesn't mix well with her current meds.