So do I, that and $5 will get you a cup of coffee.
As I do, I have told YOU multiple times that the courts will sort it out. You have a problem entertaining the thought that someone else's take on a given subject that differs from your own.
We are here because of democrat malfeasance. You don't have a corner on the truth--truth be told, you wouldn't know it if it bit you in the butt.
You've dug into the dregs and chosen to go with personal attacks rather than discuss. I had hoped you had raised your game. Silly me. Now run along junior, you're not worth my time.
No. The Electors who challenged Trump being on the ballot were registered Republicans. So those who started this were. Republicans
I’m willing to consider the alternative. But all you offer is lies. You scream disenfranchised. I point out the word doesn’t mean that. You agreed. Then you screamed illegal.
We wouldn’t even be discussing this if Trump had taken the win and walked away. But the blunder was his, not the Democrats.
Lawyers who read the Colorado ruling have said it was pretty good judicial reasoning. They hope the Supreme Court uses similarly good reasoning in their decision. All you do is scream the outcome is wrong and therefor no process can ever justify it. You scream it is illegal. You are acting like a toddler who is overdue for a nap.
The truth is this isn’t a question that has come up before. So it isn’t illegal. It is illegal if there is a case history and the judges ignored it. As an example. Before the Miranda decision confessions without that were accepted. But after the decision it was illegal to question a suspect without the warning. It was perfectly legal before because there was no law or legal decision prohibiting it.
The Judges in Colorado drew upon what appears to be applicable case law. Now the Supremes can create new case law. But that doesn’t make the actions illegal. Illegal is doing something that is prohibited. As an example, providing false documents to someone claiming they are accurate and true.
It has been illegal for a very long time to lie to Federal Agents. There are laws which clearly prohibit that. There are laws prohibiting the submission of false statements in response to a Subpoena. That is illegal.
The dissents in the Colorado Rulings are similar to your posts. It’s not fair. I don’t like it.
The Constitution isn’t about what you think is fair. As an example. A cop in Florida cited someone for having Fuck Trump on the back window of their truck. Claiming it violated the obscenity laws in the state. A Judge correctly ruled that the ticket violated the First Amendment. The ticket was illegal, because it violated established and long accepted precedent cases.
The First Amendment means you can say what you want. Unless you violate established exceptions, it’s legal. That doesn’t mean you can shout Charge to the mob and attack cops. It does mean you can write fuck Biden on your car and I’ll defend your right to do so.
You don’t want to discuss the details. You don’t want to argue the points raised by the Colorado Supreme Court. You don’t want to acknowledge Trump screwed up in the appeal. You don’t want to discuss the law or the precedents. You just want to scream that it isn’t fair.
And since you are a Veteran. You should know the old joke. It isn’t a War Crime the first time.
kansasreflector.com
