Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign

[P F Tinmore]

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

So two thirds of Palestinians want to be ruled by Hamas, an organization that has been declared TERRORIST by most of the world. How heart warming. And Israel is expected to "make peace" with this mindset.

Hamas is a constitutionally protected political party in Palestine.

The Palestinians take little interest in foreign name callers.

Yeah, why call a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel, names? They don't have time for "international opinion", after all, they're too busy suicide bombing, using their own women and children as human shields, and shooting missiles at Israel from behind schools and hospitals.

Yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah.

No adult educated reply to the truth so you go into idiot mode, you have been doing this a lot lately

I have heard Israel's propaganda talking points a gazillion times. Y'all cut & past from the same book.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

So how did Japan and Germany manage to do so after WW2 ?
So much so that they became world leaders in industry while still under occupation.

They were not settler colonial occupations.

 

[Hollie]

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

So two thirds of Palestinians want to be ruled by Hamas, an organization that has been declared TERRORIST by most of the world. How heart warming. And Israel is expected to "make peace" with this mindset.

Hamas is a constitutionally protected political party in Palestine.

The Palestinians take little interest in foreign name callers.

I would like to see a similar poll on Hamas!

Protected party or not... It's high time there were open, free elections!

Indeed, but the last time the US and Israel allowed free elections the Palestinians voted for the wrong people.

They aren't going to let that happen again.

Typical excuses for dysfunctional Arab-Moslem-Islamic terrorist enclaves.

"It's all the fault of the Great Satan and the Jooooooos."

 

[Hollie]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

So how did Japan and Germany manage to do so after WW2 ?
So much so that they became world leaders in industry while still under occupation.

They were not settler colonial occupations.

Indeed, the Arab-Moslem settler colonial occupiers from Syria, Jordan and Egypt are wholly ineffectual at building commerce and industry to become first world. That's a pattern of incompetence and ineptitude we see across the Arab-Moslem Middle East.

Indeed.

 

[RoccoR]

montelatici, et al,

What nonsense!!! Your remark is just another example of the Arab Palestinians not accepting the consequences for their action or inaction; depending upon your perspective.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinian Government in Ramallah has resources and sufficient control to organize new elections well within their capacity.

They rather are satisfied with what they have. Otherwise they would change the government. While the Arab Palestinian may say they want a new President; but, they don't really want to expend any effort on that goal. It is a form of negative self-determination. We've seen this before with the Arab-Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

So two thirds of Palestinians want to be ruled by Hamas, an organization that has been declared TERRORIST by most of the world. How heart warming. And Israel is expected to "make peace" with this mindset.

Hamas is a constitutionally protected political party in Palestine.

The Palestinians take little interest in foreign name callers.

I would like to see a similar poll on Hamas!

Protected party or not... It's high time there were open, free elections!

Indeed, but the last time the US and Israel allowed free elections the Palestinians voted for the wrong people.

They aren't going to let that happen again.

So how come they are still in power and stopping the Palestinians from holding a new election. You constantly make these same claims about Israel and the US but never prove that they did anything to alter the outcome of the vote. Seems that you are just needing to blame anyone but the Palestinians for their own stupid state of affairs.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Again, this is nonsense.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

This is an AP article and AP reports from Israel so that has to be taken in consideration.

Also the US/Israel do not want the constitution followed.

My guess is that it will be another foreign appointed dictator.

(COMMENT)

The Arab-Palestinians have had the power all along to select their own leadership. While they like to portray the invisible Hand of America as some sort of all-powerful puppet master, they fact is --- they Arab Palestinians only have themselves to blame for the outcomes.

It is mighty damn convenient and very politically expedient for the Arab-Palestinian to blame some foreign power as America for their failure. The Arab-Palestine never accepts the responsibility for their action.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Phoenall]

So two thirds of Palestinians want to be ruled by Hamas, an organization that has been declared TERRORIST by most of the world. How heart warming. And Israel is expected to "make peace" with this mindset.

Hamas is a constitutionally protected political party in Palestine.

The Palestinians take little interest in foreign name callers.

Yeah, why call a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of Israel, names? They don't have time for "international opinion", after all, they're too busy suicide bombing, using their own women and children as human shields, and shooting missiles at Israel from behind schools and hospitals.

Yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah.

No adult educated reply to the truth so you go into idiot mode, you have been doing this a lot lately

I have heard Israel's propaganda talking points a gazillion times. Y'all cut & past from the same book.

Ever thought that it is your islamonazi talking points that are at fault here. You could open your eyes and read the reports from all sides before just blaming the Jews like the good little islamonazi you are.

Is there anyone that is not paying lip service to the muslims that you believe ?

 

[Hollie]

Elections in 'Pal'istanian?

Sorry, but Islamic terrorism pays too well. The islamo-welfare train isn't leaving the station anytime soon.

I find it outrageous that UNRWA is allowed to continue the funding of Islamic terrorism and Islamic terrorist kingpins such as Abbas.

Palestinian President Constructing $13 Million Palace

Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas is constructing a $13 million palace in the West Bank, despite the country being crippled by financial woes.

The project, titled the Presidential Guest Palace in Surda, Ramallah, is listed as an ongoing project on the official website of the Palestinian Economic Council for Development & Reconstruction (PECDAR). It is due to take two years to complete, though the project's start date is not clear from the website.



Oh yeah, Abbas is also installing a helipad. That will come in handy for hauling off bags of cash when a hasty getaway is in order.

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

So how did Japan and Germany manage to do so after WW2 ?
So much so that they became world leaders in industry while still under occupation.

They were not settler colonial occupations.

Neither is the occupation of the west bank as it was a result of a war instigated by the Palestinians in 1967. That is 20 years after Israel came into existence.


Once again all you have are islamonazi talking points that have no foundation in reality.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

So how did Japan and Germany manage to do so after WW2 ?
So much so that they became world leaders in industry while still under occupation.

They were not settler colonial occupations.

Neither is the occupation of the west bank as it was a result of a war instigated by the Palestinians in 1967. That is 20 years after Israel came into existence.


Once again all you have are islamonazi talking points that have no foundation in reality.

Actually, it was the Jordanians, if you want to be technical about it. They started firing on West Jerusalem in 1967.

 

[Boston1]

I don't think there's been a Muslim Arab so called leader in Israel that didn't just take the welfare money and run.

The entire sham should be recognized for what it is, the UNRWA be thrown out and the Israeli's enact the Geneva Conventions. Repatriate all combatants and non protected persons. Regardless of Jordan's play to strip them of citizenship.

 

[Humanity]

I don't think there's been a Muslim Arab so called leader in Israel that didn't just take the welfare money and run.

There is one... Netanyahu...

Oh no wait, he's a Jewish Arab....

Funny how prefixing a nationality with a religion changes things eh!

 

[Phoenall]

I don't think there's been a Muslim Arab so called leader in Israel that didn't just take the welfare money and run.

There is one... Netanyahu...

Oh no wait, he's a Jewish Arab....

Funny how prefixing a nationality with a religion changes things eh!

So if he took the money and ran why is he still there

What a maroon you are, and he is an Israeli Jew not an arab Jew. You put it the wrong way round trying to be clever and failed again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

montelatici, et al,

What nonsense!!! Your remark is just another example of the Arab Palestinians not accepting the consequences for their action or inaction; depending upon your perspective.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Interesting.

Poll results have been consistent over six months and were affirmed Monday: two-thirds of Palestinians would like President Mahmoud Abbas to resign after a string of policy failures. Yet the Palestinian leader does not appear to be under palpable domestic or international pressure to step down.

Poll: Two-Thirds of Palestinians Want Abbas to Resign​

It is interesting to note that nowhere in the article is the constitutional procedure for replacing a president mentioned.

(COMMENT)

This is just another case that suggests that Arab-Palestinians are unable to establish a stable government.

Very few people really expects the Arab-Palestinian to follow any type of legal transfer of power. If Mahmoud Abbas is not President, then who. Remember, Khaled Mashal, is in exile. They would have to smuggle him into the country.

Most Respectfully,
R

You are being silly. You are continuing to exhibit your racist persona. Of course a people under occupation cannot establish a stable government or guarantee any type of transfer of power. The Vichy government was only stable because the Germans enforced stability, as an example.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinian Government in Ramallah has resources and sufficient control to organize new elections well within their capacity.

They rather are satisfied with what they have. Otherwise they would change the government. While the Arab Palestinian may say they want a new President; but, they don't really want to expend any effort on that goal. It is a form of negative self-determination. We've seen this before with the Arab-Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

The PA in the West Bank is illegal. It was put in place and kept in place with US money, arms, and lies.

 

[Boston1]

The PA was a failed effort to govern the mobs of Arab Muslim illegal combatants within the Israeli Sphere.

The real problem is that Israel won't play hardball, and just begin the legal process of vetting each Arab Muslim under its authority for status as a combatant or non combatant legal or not and begin repatriation for all those eligible for repatriation.

If two thirds of the Arab Muslims want Abbas gone, who cares. The Arab Muslims aren't in charge. Israel is.

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore, et al,

There may be some truth to this; but it is not "THE Truth!" It is not a truth based on the compilation of facts. It is, very close to "misinformation."

The PA in the West Bank is illegal. It was put in place and kept in place with US money, arms, and lies.

(COMMENT)

Several factors come together to explain how the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO):

• The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): (1974)

∆ The Seventh Arab Summit Conference, was held in Rabat, Morocco, in October 1974; formally acknowledged the right of the Palestinian people to a separate homeland, but without specifying that its territory was restricted to the West Bank. Most important, the PLO was for the first time officially recognized by all the Arab states as the “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.” The Arab heads of state also called for close cooperation between the front-line states and the PLO but prohibited interference by other Arab states in Palestinian affairs.
​

• The Palestinian Authority (PA): (1993 - nearly Two Decades Later)

∆ Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas met at the White House on 13 September 1993, and hammered-out and signed an agreement called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, (AKA: “Oslo Accord”). Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace. Both sides agreed that a Palestinian Authority (PA) would be established and assume governing responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a five-year period.

∆ By no means was the US the only source of revenue for the PA.

​

∆ It was no great secret that in the 2006 Elections, the radical Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) won a majority in the new Palestinian parliament, and was able to claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah. Everyone know knew then, just as they know now, that the US cannot openly deal with a designated terrorist activity; especially when HAMAS where attacking civilian targets all through the 2005 withdraw.

No one expected a bloodless transition in government. And were not about to support a HAMAS. Remember the land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip by Israel and Egypt did not start until 2007.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

There may be some truth to this; but it is not "THE Truth!" It is not a truth based on the compilation of facts. It is, very close to "misinformation."

The PA in the West Bank is illegal. It was put in place and kept in place with US money, arms, and lies.

(COMMENT)

Several factors come together to explain how the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO):

• The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): (1974)

∆ The Seventh Arab Summit Conference, was held in Rabat, Morocco, in October 1974; formally acknowledged the right of the Palestinian people to a separate homeland, but without specifying that its territory was restricted to the West Bank. Most important, the PLO was for the first time officially recognized by all the Arab states as the “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.” The Arab heads of state also called for close cooperation between the front-line states and the PLO but prohibited interference by other Arab states in Palestinian affairs.
​

• The Palestinian Authority (PA): (1993 - nearly Two Decades Later)

∆ Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas met at the White House on 13 September 1993, and hammered-out and signed an agreement called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, (AKA: “Oslo Accord”). Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace. Both sides agreed that a Palestinian Authority (PA) would be established and assume governing responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a five-year period.

∆ By no means was the US the only source of revenue for the PA.

View attachment 68673
​

∆ It was no great secret that in the 2006 Elections, the radical Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) won a majority in the new Palestinian parliament, and was able to claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah. Everyone know knew then, just as they know now, that the US cannot openly deal with a designated terrorist activity; especially when HAMAS where attacking civilian targets all through the 2005 withdraw.

View attachment 68676​

No one expected a bloodless transition in government. And were not about to support a HAMAS. Remember the land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip by Israel and Egypt did not start until 2007.

View attachment 68678 View attachment 68677​

Most Respectfully,
R

OK, so?

What does that have to do with my post?

 

[montelatici]

P F Tinmore, et al,

There may be some truth to this; but it is not "THE Truth!" It is not a truth based on the compilation of facts. It is, very close to "misinformation."

The PA in the West Bank is illegal. It was put in place and kept in place with US money, arms, and lies.

(COMMENT)

Several factors come together to explain how the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO):

• The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): (1974)

∆ The Seventh Arab Summit Conference, was held in Rabat, Morocco, in October 1974; formally acknowledged the right of the Palestinian people to a separate homeland, but without specifying that its territory was restricted to the West Bank. Most important, the PLO was for the first time officially recognized by all the Arab states as the “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.” The Arab heads of state also called for close cooperation between the front-line states and the PLO but prohibited interference by other Arab states in Palestinian affairs.
​

• The Palestinian Authority (PA): (1993 - nearly Two Decades Later)

∆ Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas met at the White House on 13 September 1993, and hammered-out and signed an agreement called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, (AKA: “Oslo Accord”). Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace. Both sides agreed that a Palestinian Authority (PA) would be established and assume governing responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a five-year period.

∆ By no means was the US the only source of revenue for the PA.

View attachment 68673
​

∆ It was no great secret that in the 2006 Elections, the radical Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) won a majority in the new Palestinian parliament, and was able to claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah. Everyone know knew then, just as they know now, that the US cannot openly deal with a designated terrorist activity; especially when HAMAS where attacking civilian targets all through the 2005 withdraw.

View attachment 68676​

No one expected a bloodless transition in government. And were not about to support a HAMAS. Remember the land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip by Israel and Egypt did not start until 2007.

View attachment 68678 View attachment 68677​

Most Respectfully,
R

I am sure you are using a neutral source. LOL

 

[montelatici]

P F Tinmore, et al,

There may be some truth to this; but it is not "THE Truth!" It is not a truth based on the compilation of facts. It is, very close to "misinformation."

The PA in the West Bank is illegal. It was put in place and kept in place with US money, arms, and lies.

(COMMENT)

Several factors come together to explain how the Palestinian Authority (PA) and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO):

• The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO): (1974)

∆ The Seventh Arab Summit Conference, was held in Rabat, Morocco, in October 1974; formally acknowledged the right of the Palestinian people to a separate homeland, but without specifying that its territory was restricted to the West Bank. Most important, the PLO was for the first time officially recognized by all the Arab states as the “sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people.” The Arab heads of state also called for close cooperation between the front-line states and the PLO but prohibited interference by other Arab states in Palestinian affairs.
​

• The Palestinian Authority (PA): (1993 - nearly Two Decades Later)

∆ Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) Negotiator Mahmoud Abbas met at the White House on 13 September 1993, and hammered-out and signed an agreement called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements, (AKA: “Oslo Accord”). Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace. Both sides agreed that a Palestinian Authority (PA) would be established and assume governing responsibilities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip over a five-year period.

∆ By no means was the US the only source of revenue for the PA.

View attachment 68673
​

∆ It was no great secret that in the 2006 Elections, the radical Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) won a majority in the new Palestinian parliament, and was able to claimed 76 of the 132 parliamentary seats, giving the party at war with Israel the right to form the next cabinet under the Palestinian Authority's president, Mahmoud Abbas, the leader of Fatah. Everyone know knew then, just as they know now, that the US cannot openly deal with a designated terrorist activity; especially when HAMAS where attacking civilian targets all through the 2005 withdraw.

View attachment 68676​

No one expected a bloodless transition in government. And were not about to support a HAMAS.

View attachment 68678 View attachment 68677​

Most Respectfully,
R

"Remember the land, air, and sea blockade of the Gaza Strip by Israel and Egypt did not start until 2007."

Israel controlled the Gaza Strip's airspace, territorial waters and controlled the movement of people or goods in or out of Gaza by land, air or sea before it removed the settlers and afterwards. A blockade by any other name. You are such a propagandist.