Politifact: Are 96% of Trump Google results from lefty sources? (Verdict: False)

[Ted Frazier]

I respectfully disagree, because I saw the claim be confirmed with my own eyes by a nickname in US message board and PJ media. Even the liberal Donald Trump backed it up.

No, 96% of Google stories on Trump aren't left-wing

 

[DGS49]

Hyperbole. Deal with it.

As always, Trump is taken literally but not seriously.

 

[MarcATL]

Hyperbole. Deal with it.

As always, Trump is taken literally but not seriously.

I can't wait to start using the "hyperbole" defense for a Democratic President.

#LOLGOP

 

[MarathonMike]

As we know our beloved President is prone to exaggeration. It's probably more like 94% Left Wing stories on Trump.

 

[depotoo]

Hyperbole. Deal with it.

As always, Trump is taken literally but not seriously.

I can't wait to start using the "hyperbole" defense for a Democratic President.

#LOLGOP

Actually, you already did with the last one.

 

[MarcATL]

I can't wait to start using the "hyperbole" defense for a Democratic President.

#LOLGOP

Actually, you already did with the last one.

Prove it liar.

 

[depotoo]

Are you stating you never tried to make excuses for his saying you could keep your doctor, or that he didn’t really say you’d save $2500 with Obamacare? Or any other number of things? If not, forgive me.

I can't wait to start using the "hyperbole" defense for a Democratic President.

#LOLGOP

Actually, you already did with the last one.

Prove it liar.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Is there any doubt that Google is lefty fascist leaning, Politifact is lefty fascist leaning, Facebook is lefty fascist leaning, Twitter is lefty fascist leaning, Fake News is lefty fascist leaning and as fascists they are going to suppress free speech, access to information and manipulate/evaluate information to fit their left wing fascist agendas.

Sure .. be easily distracted and quibble over percentages but those realities remain.

 

[Lumpy 1]

 

[Ted Frazier]

As we know our beloved President is prone to exaggeration. It's probably more like 94% Left Wing stories on Trump.

Source: Mr. “Marathon Mike”.

 

[Skylar]

I respectfully disagree, because I saw the claim be confirmed with my own eyes by a nickname in US message board and PJ media. Even the liberal Donald Trump backed it up.

No, 96% of Google stories on Trump aren't left-wing

Politifact didn't realize that Trump was just pulling that stat sideways out of his ass?

 

[Ted Frazier]

Is there any doubt that Google is lefty fascist leaning, Politifact is lefty fascist leaning, Facebook is lefty fascist leaning, Twitter is lefty fascist leaning, Fake News is lefty fascist leaning and as fascists they are going to suppress free speech, access to information and manipulate/evaluate information to fit their left wing fascist agendas.

Sure .. be easily distracted and quibble over percentages but those realities remain.

And if the fact-checkers debunk your BS, just call THEM lefties.
Lefty lefty lefty!

 

[Lumpy 1]

Is there any doubt that Google is lefty fascist leaning, Politifact is lefty fascist leaning, Facebook is lefty fascist leaning, Twitter is lefty fascist leaning, Fake News is lefty fascist leaning and as fascists they are going to suppress free speech, access to information and manipulate/evaluate information to fit their left wing fascist agendas.

Sure .. be easily distracted and quibble over percentages but those realities remain.

And if the fact-checkers debunk your BS, just call THEM lefties.
Lefty lefty lefty!

Yup, pretty well, parrots of the same pandemonium

 

[Hellokitty]

Politifact is a lefty source...

 

[Camp]

Why does anyone believe or take seriously anything our doofus illegitimate President says or tweets?

 

[Lumpy 1]

Why does anyone believe or take seriously anything our doofus illegitimate President says or tweets?

Sanity

 

[ColonelAngus]

They say, False, so what is the number? They just say it’s not 96%. What was their empirical conclusions?

95%?

I didn’t see it in the article. Did I just miss it?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

[

They say, False, so what is the number? They just say it’s not 96%. What was their empirical conclusions?

95%?

I didn’t see it in the article. Did I just miss it?

What you missed is the point of the article, there is no set percent, the results of a google search are ever changing. A search 3 hours from now will give you different results than one now, how different depends on the topic being searched.

 

[ColonelAngus]

[

They say, False, so what is the number? They just say it’s not 96%. What was their empirical conclusions?

95%?

I didn’t see it in the article. Did I just miss it?

What you missed is the point of the article, there is no set percent, the results of a google search are ever changing. A search 3 hours from now will give you different results than one now, how different depends on the topic being searched.

I am still waiting on all of those nice tweets you read to the gay guy.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

[

They say, False, so what is the number? They just say it’s not 96%. What was their empirical conclusions?

95%?

I didn’t see it in the article. Did I just miss it?

What you missed is the point of the article, there is no set percent, the results of a google search are ever changing. A search 3 hours from now will give you different results than one now, how different depends on the topic being searched.

I am still waiting on all of those nice tweets you read to the gay guy.

A little early to be drinking isn't it? Not that I am judging or anything. I am sure you have a very valid reason for being incoherent at this time of the morning.