Politics

[4thhorsemanzach]

The ruling class prevails on a normal basis, whilst the elite lost resource and get weak, for the ruling class has hoarded wealth, and does not give it out because of the selfishness of their nature. The sinful get strength when controlled by sin, due to their insidious aims to make people feel bad, and they succeed, but is it true success? To make sense out of sin is difficult for it grapples the man’s psyche and tousles it around to the experience of death itself. Dissipating morals grow weary the elite, and they can’t serve to the same degree without their resource. Anxiety results and the ruling caste, with their surplus of wealth have a sort of sick contentedness with being strong. What is to say about the elite, and their lack of progression in a world of poverty, sin that doesn’t occur but controls, and death? We haven’t overcome this death yet, conquered its concept, so were left with this feat on our hands, and the only answer that succumbs us is death itself. We can’t do drastic measures, due to oppressive effects in the world, so how does one just transcend from one location to the source of authority? The mystery recoils in our mind and we assert dignity in remaining lenient with our measures. To hold back and develop, while controlling the government, seems the only answer. Thinking death is possible, and the loss of memory therefrom, is allowing the ruling class to succumb you but it is only rational to consider death possible, or is it? A method to transcend entices us, and the strength of our minds does not truly dissolve. Our morals are intact, and our wit avails us of strategy against the wicked, to make them feel stultified by the indignity of their own means. Hopefully anticipating moves of God, we find ourselves not understanding them when we don’t get recuperated with resource. Why can’t we create these resources by our own means? Exalt us to the benefit of constant success, and let us not hit the downfall of anxiety in its ruthless tendency to sustain pain in the individual. Asinine thinking occurs in the ruling class, and if our authority doesn’t appease them with good feeling they berate our minds to the degree of just wanting that awful rest the creeps up to our minds as a need, an urge. Our definite character sets an example though, and we accomplish when we are needful. If only we could escape to a better situation, where support ameliorates the withdrawal of drugs that enhance us, then we could truly lead the world.
Leadership of the world spiritually has people thinking well, but they evolve inscrutably. They develop perspectives from our evolution and are witnessed for progressing from what they supernaturally sense in the aristocracy. I’ve noticed their progression, and the mediocre have expanded their vocabulary and noticed the linguistics of words. It has helped, and we have spread to the stars our agenda, adapting invitations to certain folk to the source of authority, of which God knows we will get to. They say we will transcend in a way in the minds motion, but leave open opportunity for someone to bring us there by not asserting it except as at some point soon, for we will transcend at some point soon inevitably for it is only rational to determine a being there perfect. It is dutiful support of God, to give us a better situation and allow others to help us by not being too assertively conclusive in their actual thought, not just the motion of their mind, which they say in a way proving we will transcend soon lest they come up with a more profitable agenda. God leaves us thinking all our endeavors have been necessary, and we will never regress to the point of being reset in our revelations. Death can’t stop us, and the dichotomy by method of beauty is merging. The will is for power, like Friedrich says, but is also for specifics, like beauty expressed close to the world. The way we look in our appearance in the soul body and our vague appearance when transcending to the world has people not sensing our grace properly, and wanting to exploit such weaknesses, as a lack of expressed grace in the world, and the clout that results.
Thus we get stronger, by our inherent necessity to overcome. We accumulate strength in our development with resource, our precision to our rhetoric and education and exact it without resource to really test ourselves against the struggle against tyranny; the duplicitous tyranny that revokes opportunity to fix the world, just by refraining to moderate the good agenda into the spectrum of thought. The realm of the mediocre influenced grandly by the ruling class, which has wealth to gain prominence in the world, and withholds their knowledge of good, to assert a poor policy that just masquerades a sinful thought.
Potency is thus anticipated to thus surprise the ruling class, with convincing propriety; propriety as in the conventional standard being met with. Aghast is our reaction to the sinful dilemmas of the ruling class, to avoid chances to be good, for the sake of strength to weaken, which fulfill their ego driven will? How could a will be so devoid of good? Is it their will to weaken, or is it circumstantial to the change in our resource, our privation, the cause of their dismay and recalcitrance, and obvious languishing with strength of mind, due to resource intact to bear upon our minds and be crucial to stop, to overcome. A surprise is wanted. A surprise of effect that results in progression, our mutual will with the ruling caste. To progress invariably in a way that implies success that is drastic change in the will; and we pursue this deliberately, this drastic change.
The will and its character are noted by us. Particulars being achieved and the wills magic to have willed for something in the past to just follow course in the future and achieve it. The essence of the will to accomplish new revelations and elevate new standards, to affect supremacy and mend conflict, is regarded as the beings doing. What it does and the complexity of the character to have a course fateful individualistically different than other fates. The harmony of differences and conjoined wills strengthening forces and combining when one can bine to that level of a point and have something new appear to us.
Bob from hades, which follows with me, thinks people are striven towards their indefinite happiness. Their means do not secure them and it is sort of a variance of thwarted agendas, and a reclaim to authority in new directions, with a conflict of wills and an emergence of an order. To incite lively agendas in a situation controlled and mitigated by the ruling caste. The revolution is private to the aristocracy and those with me, and we revolve when? When we change our political agenda, we revolve to new means that challenges the upmost exertion of strength. The ends reached in the capacity to yield the ends of our capability. To do liberally what we are capable of, what our capacity is at highest extent, and to test our beings fruitfully to live accostedly. The cost of our deeds is considered, and our bargaining of the will religiously to accomplish the want of our beings, which is the mobility of spirit, dead or alive.
Our custom to eat and drink religiously has been counteracted by the necessity to work in the world. We can’t resort to town to just be normal and engage in the activities that regulate social life; the customs. Our customs are faltering, but it is our custom to define new terms, and discuss them. It regulates our will, so it is considered custom. What we are accustomed to doing the unique practices that regulate the will.
From whence do we derive happiness when the will is weak? From grievances of the present, to comfort the being with how it should be, or from the striven will, that exerts an increase of strength. The value in the strenuous effort to overcome and feeling pain to adapt to it, and develop one’s strength so we can cultivate new ideas at the point pain results in greater mobility and demeanor, or in short acceptance.
The will to coincide with a comrade and work together mutually with understanding intact, and reinforcement in relation, to unify ones agenda and make one better is our will. Depreciation of the progress is what hinders us, till we notice our evolution and feel exalted in our means. The discomforting pain without resource, necessary resource, is making us rest though, and the rest is excessive, but the anxiety and the pain require adaption to surmount. We should experience adaption not to the pain, the rancorous pain, but the mode of living without resource that makes us feel better; the noble feeling of not having resource and still being strong. The striven will when one strains his energy is enervated, but is this point of intermittence preceding greater power. The pain lengthens itself due to the psyche of pessimism in the individual, and the feeling of good strengthens itself due to the religious zeal of the patron of his own pain.
So if the pain would discontinue if we were more religious during these times, what is religious? Being more faithful and devout in ones preceding’s seems to entail religion in a way. Adhering to one’s own standard of dogma. If it is advised to stay up, it should be done zealously without reluctance caused by the pain, for the want is to be above the norm. One needs to be greater than how he feels in his pursuit which is felt, and restores good feeling to the being. To not give up, or wait for resource, but to benefit from the times without it is the goal, and morals would proclaim us do something useful, like try to think new thoughts without the resource, to overcome privation
The deleterious influences can be supplanted in their root perspectives of bad. Corrosion of the being and a constant generation of health have bad sustaining itself for longevity. Harmful is their pain, but it doesn’t do true harm to the being. It is just a feeling, without meaning almost, because of the cause being sin; something non-sensual; artificiated pain, a feeling of irritation due to the factors of a painful urge for rest is like not real pain until religious endeavors to turn it into something real. Something with meaning, like we haven’t progressed and it’s necessary to work to rid us of the feeling of pain, morally, so we can exonerate the sinful of their wrongful deeds by creating a benevolent agenda for them. To keep us up, and on guard, until the stimuli of dopamine has our specimen reaching the extraordinary measures that exalt us above bad rest. Is it true, what they say about staying up, and making mobile the spirit, preparing the dead for place of resurrection? If it is, we don’t need resource, and were only deprived when we want it and we intellectualize in relation someone not giving it to us, when it is needed and they have it. If we don’t consider them, and just pursue health, we are granted privileges for our newfound strength.
Pain is a reaction to bad circumstance, and bad in general and it is not the opposite of pleasure. There is such thing as good pain, like the binding of the soul to new concepts, which evolves the soul. If pain were considered good and a factor of ones tested strength, it would be okay to experience, and wouldn’t leave one complaining about his presupposed detriment, his loss of ambition. Having ambition when pained by the bad that surrounds one is what eradicates the pain at root. Believing one can progress steadily with the pain, and morally deriving a solution to deal with the pain until it goes away, by being ambitious and trying new things. If I stay up for a few days, this pain will be surely done away with; abrogated from attention.
So what is the solution to such lack of pleasure, with its great import in the soulmate core deemed sufficient and necessarily willed for at perfect times, to the excessiveness of pain, but making each wealthy. To believe in this political endeavor is to be deemed rationally lofty empirically, but introspection so has it that this is the outcome of all that is surveyed; wealth to the individual. Means are gotten from virtue, and the virtue of the elite is progressing at a rate that the world will no longer be impoverished after death? After death occurs, and pain eliminates itself, the remedy will be at hand in the world of transcendence? It seems to be the case that having a body in the world owes to a lot of pain and people get access to it, causing pain by method of bad. To hold the sinners when transcending gives them no point of causation because of the increased mobility and freedom of transcendence.
After constitutive success and development at a stimulated rate, pain is subsequent. Pain comes in to bring people back to the reality that they are not always superhuman, and need the will of God, or resource to make them stronger sometimes. So when we run out of resource, we have pain due to the enduring success, and the change of pace to normal thought processes, and energy strains that occur in a sin controlled world without proper harmony. One gets use to the success, and when it ceases at that great pace, one initially adapts to the lowered level of success in pain. Our pain doesn’t subside until more resources arrive or the adaption is complete and the comparison justifiable valued for extenuated progression with or without resource, which doesn’t become output in comparison. Then, after adaption or resource, one is back successful again, turning pages and sparking the energy of others; being sociable and gregarious with the energy of resource.
Resource is beneficial but doesn’t last. Supplies run out, and we don’t find ourselves accompanied by that feeling of wealth, but are thrown into needful urges for what the resources have us portend. We are living significantly happy with them, and in misery without them, and the conservatism that has reached deprivation in the world doesn’t avail us, for the liberal agenda of the most high hasn’t been promulgated yet in a speech. To set a policy that makes people reconsider their faulty bargaining skills, or refrain from giving. Let people get drunk! In the streets! That is the task of the liberals, to ensure people do what their nature obliges them to do when free. What is considered when experiencing times of happiness and peace, even the crazy, is what they should do. To kill! The instincts of man sublimated in this text; his recoil into pessimism due to the feeling of weakness that shrouds his true epitome of strength momentarily.
Liberty is something valued to the core. One should not inhibit liberty but it happens frequently due to the rules of governance, and the allotted concern with punishment as a result of the most liberal deeds. The will to destruction is noted as realistic; to destroy what gets in the way of us, our liberty and see ourselves as noble revolutionaries in the process. The reformation of places to make use of them is necessary to enhance peoples living circumstance, and have people get what they truly want, at those liberal moments where they reach the level of on high at fleet and realize such.
What is left for us to do, but leave our situation for a better one? A departure; a leave to the source of authority to make this most liberal agenda a constructivist causing realism is necessary to make ourselves happy with excess in resource, and not reverting tendencies to pain. To develop the world by forcing them to contemplate life with morals accentuated and quality of a being valued for its true good; its essential strength, and its possible strength are differentiated, and the essential strength is made actual by a liberating of the will, to actuate the true decisions that people want to make, to help people as a preference over protocol that is devoid of moral value.
What is the passion of the general individual, which is common to the species of male, but politics? Politics in society, and believing that the situation can be made better; the will can be liberated to emphasize individualistic asset in expression. People seek a domesticated group to be with and spend time with, and minimize their world scheme as a result of numerity in people and normal means of reaching conventional political success, save the revolutionaries, that are left quiet when politics are unpopular.
It is our nature to become something better. Becoming influential while being influential involves new tactics that are advanced, since the last, which resulted in the being. The clout of grace, and death (a meeting of grace) a reaching of one’s individualistic appearance, which gets over the bodily disfigurements or false senses, forced appendages to the appearance of other people’s causation in their depending minds that the spirit overcomes in an instant; governs, but senses the ugly of you that is portrayed in the mind ahead of time, when grace is too extreme, or when the being is in need. Seeing one’s body in a normal sense, for that is what is left, the spirit, the perfect spirit, free from harm dealt physiologically; the calumny of the world to diminish the illusion of grace when it gets so outstanding; the collusion of the bad involved, to deprecate senses of beauty, not possible with the inveterate consequence of death (Inveterate means having a particular way in course that is unlikely to change; an established habit or activity; inveterate refers to veteran, which is professional and established).
Thus the zenith to our values is considered. We value strength, so being stronger seems to the virtuous means to success. We value rest minutely, but strength highly; exertions of strength, the extenuating of causing factors. We think that being strong enough will get us to the absolute. The absolute is the feeling of unification; pain is the division of feeling, and requires forcible physics to amend. Absolutely happy is our will. It is what we want, and power is a feature of this happiness. We will for happiness, and pleasure and orderly productivity and harmony with others, and new ideas, revelations; not just power, for power helps us achieve this, and is like a mediating factor that is primly willed for to bring about happiness. The end can be willed for, not just the means, and it is felt in times of pain and has its energy to move the world in its favor with prayer. Prayer is powerful.
Thus the motive of the present is to get powerful, so we can be happy; power to effect change, so we can have our freedom and not be inhibited or oppressed in poverty. How do we get more power from this standpoint is the question. How can we develop our level of power when we don’t expect it to be developed, except by God’s providence? Must He advance us in the world? Where are we left to advance? Nebulous times of uncertainty in the outcome of our actions have us anticipating death; a drastic change that if nothing happens, is ensured of us. We die to get a new body, and a different, better situation and certain entities don’t like rest when pain is minimalized, like when transcending after death, so they talk and commune. Talking, and merging the dichotomy by a different means, than by method of just the medium keeping us together, and resulting in too much one-sided focus, and not enough difference in philosophy. To solidify after death in the world of treachery is the goal, lest it happens before death with transcendence. How long could it take when our measures achieve happiness and we have conditions for this? I need time with my soulmate, so after I die, assuming I do or did, I will need to talk to her soon, and doing this transcendentally is too obscure for my suiting, so I must solidify if this is too occur, lest it doesn’t happen. We are hopeful, but the beauty is in the spirit and God’s pace has us thinking death is an advantage; an advantage to move more freely, so no one can threaten us, or imprison us to hospitals due to radical power. We can be who we are meant to be, and not worry about death anymore, for it already happened, and now we can’t die! Death as a cursor into futility is a deceit caused by the dead that just want to rest for goodness sake, and not disturb the living. A position in town and a return to town after death is expected though, if I die. Something great is expected in the process before death anyway; a new method of God to cease sin’s hold upon progressive tendencies to cause work that isn’t as progressive. A change of the slowing process, to hasten the prophesy of my life. Where is the next significant check point? What can we expect, when our behavior is so rudely suppressed in social events where we are outgoing? Grace is the clout we need, to have power to change someone’s life with the inveterate magnitude of fortune and its way of extending profit to a certain cause. To have them invest our cause is our goal.
What is prophesy, except segments of life, which were visualized beforehand? What makes prophesy, prophesy, except predetermination to succeed, and destiny to fail? Makes my enemies out to be like characters in a play; actors that are lacking in genuinity so they just get factored in as people of prophesy that are determined by it. They just get factored in, and overcoming them in particular serves to be an asset. The many enemies of this lifestyle, back again to be cruel, for their used to pain, and have the energy to like it. No apprehensive ways about death, just living in the now, in the present, without apprehensions that weaken them. No failures to dwell upon when it seems possible, for they live lives as failures and adapt to the regard of loser, maintaining a strength that makes them feel successful.
Not knowing the end result of my actions has me considering death as a possible, which makes me need knowledge that comes from God; ultimate knowledge, which affects my means. The true knowledge is I will get married at some point in the not too distant future, for I could sense the knowledge of the wedding beforehand, prophetically. Since I know that, I know that my relationship will be absolutely perfect in the future, and Beth will never have to deal with the aggravating tendencies of the unworthy like other females in the world. How lucky! Success granted me, and a God that listens to the prayers I make; the content of what is prayed for is observed faithfully.
Death is just a transition of thinking one way, to thinking another way. So once you’re lifted out of your body, and feel the love of God, you know life is eternally, and you relapse into a comfortable rest where you typically don’t have to speak in certain cases. One can speak when one dies, but knowing absolute heaven will occur, and witnessing work towards it is enough for certain others, who sometimes speak periodically. Like you want to be around someone because of their joy, and success, but don’t like them enough to speak to them, or too many people are speaking to them already, making you not wanting to be an additional factor. When can you prioritize your communication is how these people think that have died, and enjoy the temporary rest. They think in the soul, and if they have the right outlook, their pain is not felt, and they are resting. I would not rest, for I am abnormal in this way, and need things urgently. I would work constantly, until progression to a better situation was made, and this is just a factor of my dignity.
What is the difference between peaceable and peaceful? Peaceable is one can be made to experience peace (prone to peace) and peaceful means one is fulfilled with feelings of peace (generating peace).
The situation of the world is complex. The normal, the mediocre, the free-living atypical thinkers, the purposeless, the constricted purpose had, the ruling caste, the smart, the elite, the scientific, the religious, the followers, the leaders, the petty, the trite, the ignorant, the brave, the assertively bad, the supernatural etc. Many characteristics constitute the world, but the average intelligence of the world is behind the highest evolution, and the past thought, surpasses the present thought, which is a bad sign. So the mediocre, a good portion of the world, become extreme conservatized people, with an illusion of moderation that they superficially take claim to, for it still exists. They stand aside the liberals with prejudice for the answer and solution, and find themselves polarized in their conflict that defends a false or truant standpoint that they don’t really possess except in the course of reluctance empirically when vice. False in the sense that it is not truly wanted; negations in politics accepted empirically, when they make sense as possible politics. Polarity enlightens us about uncertainty. When not deeply concordant in political agenda, it affects uncertainty, and one sided polarization in stance, sometimes prematurely to defend their sensical politics, and be right in debate of what they possess.
Of whom are the supernatural classes? They are those which have a supernatural sense of their environment, and don’t simply sense it normally, of which take claim to this type of keenness that are dichotomized with the worldly individuals that have basic sense, and don’t know the uniqueness of environment consciously in terms acceptance of it; the distanced, and the close; the close carry an illusion of being distanced, since the worldly are the majority in many cases.
How did the world get so conservative, and society become denigrated friendship groups sectarian to the whole of democracy? Because government power kept being augmented to get rid of vice, as the empirical solution, and since bad exists, the world became conservatism-oriented in conformity with the proceedings of government, like their minds were controlled by propaganda and merchandise in the world. As though polarities controlled their minds with what they propagate and caused a pitted rebellion between two fictitiously created sides (their report was of fictitious character; not a realistic side) to create new age moderation, which is a recoiling from fascism, and a stray from anarchy.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

this is excellent writing, I expect someone to respond.

 

[Little-Acorn]

this is excellent writing,

By whom?

And, did you put it in the "Politics" section because we have no "Metaphysics" section in this forum?

 

[HenryBHough]

Anything that won't fit on a bumper strip is a waste of bandwidth.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

its my writing, i wrote it all today

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

interesting comment about metaphysics. I thought it was politically based, but metaphysics are involved.

 

[Little-Acorn]

The English is strained, the adjectives ill-defined and unhelpful, and any connection to actual persons or events, living or dead, is nonexistent.

It appears to be a piece of word art (not an essay, since essays have a central theme and a purpose) whose goal is to tell the writer what he already knows, not to tell the reader something he doesn't know. Reading it is like wading through Jell-o.

I give it a D+.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

Progress is benefiting from acting close to the soul. One always progresses in a way, but can progress more be expressing the personality. Not being distanced. One can be close to his soul or the expression of his individuality when he is being self-wise, and far away with the soul, or the personality rather when he is too critical of his environment, and thinking empirically in a negative relative way. The essence dims. Feeling close to the self, and far from the self, while going with a soul is the contemplation. When someone feels far he is extrinsic to a more so thought degree, and his mind is with the extrinsic, which is a component of the being. Not being centered. Finding the soul is progression. There could be a positive sense to regress, but because of the starting point, it is typically going backwards to the soul. Re could be again, like secondarily though, and when someone regresses, he thinks again the closeness of his soul in a secondary type way as a result of the starting point to get close to the soul that is meant for just that. The suffix “gress” in progress and regress could mean attachment, and when one attaches his mind to his substance, he progresses. When someone does wrong, he attaches to his soul, and that is why it is regression.
A predisposition is the moving emotions prior to intuition about something, but before regard of it. Disposition is the moving state of the emotions. Position is one intuited state, but the emotions don’t imply a state that’s fixed. A state in general that is fixed in intuition is ones position. Movements of the emotions can’t be regarded as fixed in one place, for there are implications in the move, which are condition to its regard. One’s bodily position can be checked in general, as well as one’s state in general. Emotions are a degree from the fixed state, but can be regarded as having a transitive state.
Perception of one’s level is age. Level is specific in a person’s age. My age is fourteen years old. So the age can increase, while the soul age perspective, specific to youth and elderliness stays the same, for we are always progressing in some way. My age at creation was nine. A visage is a vision of the person of one level, being noticed. The level of a playing field. Image is not a perception of the level, but a picture that is not perceived. The image is in motion when the self, so the picture is not perceived, for the motion can’t be captured in a realistic sense. An image is a picture that is not perceived, and the other regard to the perception of a level, which can entail age. A picture is an image, but it is the check of an image or the drawing of one. An image is the visual of something depicted and is in the moment or portrayed in a drawing which captures the sense of something. A picture doesn’t capture.

Gender is noun of creation which is different objectively. My gender is male. Smart is not a noun, so my gender is not smart, lest the concept is broadened beyond normal grammar. Engender is to create something objectified in someone else, that comes from a different method than one the person has at hand. To engender someone’s virtue is to develop it uniquely in a person’s soul and the differences get merged into the sameness of the soul. One doesn’t create the virtue in the person’s soul, he develops it, but he creates it at first, and develops the soul with that creation. The differences get merged means the person synthesizes them and converges his soul to the leadership of the engendering. The virtue of that person comes from something different. A gender is what it comes from. Engender is for something different, or comes from something different. Differences are necessary in gender because it is essential to the frame work of the individuality. The differences are attributes that are outgoing, and not away from something. What moves someone away is his differences though, and away can be towards. Within the same, the differences are attractive and the sameness keeps.
Manifest means to come to appearance. It is different from evident in the sense that it is a verb. Evident means that something is proof. A symptom of proof is manifest. When factors are manifest, they are emerging and it refers to the act. Something that sets itself and brews so to speak. To fester is different than manifest because manifest is the end product of a fester or something that could fester, which is present (the result of moving belief) and refers to an asset or an actualized factor. Fester doesn’t refer to a factor, it just implies that something is infected and manifest means that the factors are acting or the proof is phenomenal and there. Fester is the decay of something or the downwards incline of something that is not accepted in the root or construed by the root with medium in the perspective. Perspectives just cluttering up or referring intermittingly in one motion and moving with root belief is fester. Truth doesn’t fester lest pondered down to the root and moving around the root in correspondence, or symptomatic pondering of the perspective with development of it from the believed root that construes the perspective. Boiling and moving away from the root and towards the root and emerging while going down is festering. Manifest is the proof of something completely in endurance; the outgoingness of the root with perspective that results in a perceived proof.
Manifold is diverse for it is the intuited function of factors, the end of them moving back and forth. The end of a fold in the psyche sense that happens with multiplicity. Numerous factors go back to each other, and forth in synthesis when something is manifold. They return to base, and it is the end product of the folding of factors that go back due to many in the course of synthesis.
A transvaluation is the developed product of a rated and moving value to a new level. Up in general. The rating of the value moves figuratively. Transfigure is to figure something that is new and a change of level as a result of the figure, which elevates the state. Transcendence is to send oneself to a new level elevated beyond the basicality of the being; to leave up to a varied level of the spiritual from the physical. To elevate implies the prefix “trans” when a new level is reached from one level to a different level (not just a development). The prefix “trans” implies a move from point to a changed point. Different points and an elevation from the points. Transportation is moving from a port to a different port in a portable construct or form. To elevate to a different port means that one rises out of one place and destines himself to another. A rise occurs in the soul. Elevate means to rise out of or to move from one level to a better level in a upwardly developing way. A level is a standard of rating. To move from one place to another place is not transportation if the level doesn’t change upwardly or there is not a port considered. A being is not a port when he is not harboring or back from a post.
Up means to go to the available. So staying up implies one is availing himself of opportunity and not resting. Not moving to, is resting and it implies a lower level of wakefulness when lowered down. The noticed movements are down to the closed. Wakeful means alert, and sense of reality develops one level of wakefulness when open. Being closed off to the world is being tired and regressing to a shut level. We are always awake, but openness makes one higher. The goal is to stay up continuously for the practice makes spirit mobile, and the adaption of this keeps the vigor of youth if sustained to a permanent change to the adaption that evolves base need past bad rest.
Diffident means shy but is different in the sense that it is reserved difference. Equality can make one diffident, but can also exalt the difference, and have one rise out of the order of equality. Diffident relates to difficult in the sense that it is away from something. Differences are away from something or away to something. Difficult is away from easy. Away from the belief or away to the belief. To reach belief by way. Difficult is challenging because belief must be reached. In easy stuff, belief is just maintained sometimes. The purpose of reaching belief is difficult.
A rubric is an applied category that can act as an authoritative rule. Categories are not always applied, as a factor in experience. The rubric of a government is the scaled contingencies, and the just option governs efficaciously. Unjust governs by method of rule, and risk of punishment when it meets with the empirical with notion of reason that can prevail even when bad.
Efface means inward from the front and it does away with the current merge (surface), by leaving it behind or eliminating it. To efface oneself is to capitulate to a worse standard sometimes for it moves from the considered merge and doesn’t concentrate on the final edge.
Ardor is different from passion for it is the effected work of passion against something. It is the tedium of passion. The strain or effect of passion at work is the ardor. Passion is the natural occurrence of virtues purpose; the root purpose invigorating the being at essence. The sustaining objective is the passion.
Dynamic implies the constancy of change and the versatility of activity in a process. The ongoing variety of progress occurring at one point and time is the dynamics of a period. Factors between people that are congruent, than discordant, but volatile is dynamic.
Concept refers to notions toward what is included and ideas relate to the coming up with new things or starting or initiating of conceptions. Including something in something is an idea. Beginning a process that is invented is an idea. An idea is something that comes up, which refers to newness and originality. Exceptions are out of what is concluded and accepting is the method of including.
And affinity is a liking unlimited; a similarity that binds to the objects infinite aspect. Endless numbers of relations in an affinity are noticed as possible or definite in the inquired speculation. It is a certain quality of liking associated with the outgoingness of what is not finite in character. Affinity is an expression of infinity that meets with the last regarded. It is a move with liking to something that has quantity, but is not final, just last.
A faculty is an inherent power outlining the form of something. The faculties of our cognition are the intuitive properties effect on knowledge, but the outline of this knowledge functioning innately; the synthesis being created is the faculty at work. The intrinsic synopsis of a thought is its faculty and it generates the thought. It contains it. The synopsis is thought at inception. A faculty entertains a thought when extrinsic becomes the outline of the form of the thought. It obtains when its power or ability generates the thought. A line is what is therein from point to point so the outline of the form of something is what is made from point to point out of the thought and it contains and generates the thought.
A transcendental principle is a principle that delivers the object, and occurs within the individualistic energy of the person without physical manifestation.
A scruple is the moment of notice in the possibilities and contingencies of good and can be termed a moral hesitation. The perception of good itself when considering it is a scruple. Scrupulous means morally decisive.
A contingency is different than a dependency in that it is course-wise and systematic and not always pending into something, but just containing a former cause and a chance action. A determined choice amongst possibilities when determining factors are involved is a contingency. It clasps to an associated factor, and sometimes depends on it. Something is contingent on something when it is possible because of it.
Matter is disassociated to the self. The environment includes ones determinative perception, so it doesn’t always amount to matter and is substance. It is associated to one’s outlook. Hence, building material is stuff without the determining perception so it is matter; disassociated to the self and just stuff. Perception is across the bounds inclusion. Including one perception creates the harmony of the substance. Things having a vibe of soul and the appearance of individuality and character are substance
Demands are wants or needs that reach and end and can result in a necessary force. Demands are forces that cause the person to go outward with tending inward motions and outward speech and force contingent to the type of demand. Inward towards the will, so one can create a necessary force that obligates the person.
A process is a course over, and excess is what is left over. Assess is to look over. Excessive can be good if what is left over is resource, or virtue goes over the limit and becomes excessive. Extremities are excessive when the virtue develops the soul, and leaves and ongoing state after the completion of the act.
A prerogative is something you got to do that is in your motive; your emotional inclination. A priority is a set standard of agenda, and can refer to points.
A sage has to do with the due credit of th
ought in process that contributes in series, and pertains to an era. A saga is a prime interval. The wisdom is in course instinctually, and it is political. To gain from a thought, and have ones essence ascertained for profiting. Primal behavior; no moment of hesitation, that gets accredited. Hesitation seen as a lapse into moral pretense. A point of change in the sage. The naturally accredited in relation pertains to the saga when wise. Tribute is like an ode to someone with rhetorical thought that accredits. Tributes for sagas. The essentiality of the beings progression that is significant and serves as a mark for glory is the legend of a person. The golden asset.
Consistency and repetition are contraries. Consistency refers to the maintained level, and casual advancement in a way. The warranted concerns are fundamental, and this is to sustain the progression of someone to consistently and by virtue advance. The stream of rhetoric in politics is also fundamental.
When one scores, he must gain. Scoring a benefit, by killing someone is an example. But there must be gain to the well-being.
When the unique soul is translated philosophically, with new concepts, it is an exposition. Translate the contemplation. Putting forth unique thought with your essence, is exposition. It is religious.
Possession Is exerting control of, and accepting ownership. One possess his unique language. One of a kind.
Amaze is the affections of a one-sided wonder, with content or experience considered.
The wealth of a thought is the fund of it, and what is giving in relation that contributes is the credit.
Doling out benefits implies command and is the virtue of organization. Recommending. Appointing people for advantageous position. The good of the action is organization. The process. What you develop with. Naturally governed reason.
Fulfilling at a speedily increasing quantity the content is extremity. Making points firstly in a fast way and moving to the end of capability. Processing quickly and concretely; finely vast information sometimes, and giving the knowledge out in increased measure. Extremity; utilization at heightened measure to the process. No prohibition of virtues pace development. Like in intermittence. Emitting outstandingly. Sometimes you’re just maintaining a standard, but this is heightening the standard. Increasing the length of the contemplations rating. The unique fixation of the sensed thought being contemplated with excess content noticed. Philosophical definition in a certain term for it, but noting that it is not closed; it is united and open.
Extraordinary means accessorizing ones plainness in terms clothes that are greatly stylish for it is a plus from common. It is adding to experience of normality.
A deficit of good is the implication of bad that is not original, but recurring modes of subordinated nature. True bad.
Valor is a dominant feature of my war policy. But what is valor? Valor is the candor of going from offense to defense. Straight forward, and solidified are the movements of candor. Returning to base, and getting a better rating at the stored contemplations, is a back notion to candor though. Naturally towards something. From the convoy directly. Valorous maintain good status; the statistics of their deeds are evaluated. The rating, credit, level, skill, magic and so forth, envisaged as pluses. The statistics are seen in the spirit; assessed and percieved. Chivalry is being forthcoming in a brave way; the defensive aspect is valor and the offense aspect is the chivalry which can have a neutral effect on the enemy. Chivalry is being on the siade of justice; an advocate. A sophisticated gentleman. Being courageous and defensive is valor; having zeal. Zeal is the presence of the emotions.
When one reaches the extreme, and hits the negative, he haunts.
In affluent, the mood of the emotions is streaming forth; fluent or flowing.
The essence gets governed to become true, and positive.
IF there is not base understanding to given measure of contemplation, it can come upon an impact relatively, causing further contemplation.
A diversion that is sense wise, and not reasonable is usually followed, and not a true diversion in the experience. In evaluating someone, it is good to convert to their side. A success is a true conversion. To convert someone.
When assessing democracy one has sections that are quantitative; regards that move in experience in the soul, noting its magnitude and the spiritual feel of an environment. Natural reaction of the presence, due to sense of energy.
It’s necessary in relation to conduce, but whenceforth does one conduce?
Normalcy is habitual when actions are chosen because of inclinations; inclinations that recur. Inclinations are the reason for action mainly, and it is not purpose in end, which refers to inclinations as a factor but not a reason.
Private moments where you are totally different, and this is emphasized in conduct could be separated from the general harmony of the environment in publicity where the friendship core is involved. Distance from friends, to experience private stuff. Differences tend to be emphasized circumstantially, but could be abstract, and just a situation, where differences could be more subtly characterized, like in mate moments of the soul.
Adapting people to your conversions; relation. Fostering to their thought for cultivation purposes.
Addition is used for contributions that serve as a plus; a positive point that implies an increase in something, like ones rating. Elaborations that are denser and increase in the moment could use the transition in addition. When one serves to add to an exponent or base factor there is combination. Binding to the same point by method of prompt, is combining forces.
When posting up in different places, there is mobility.
Morality is the considered good, and not a principle when it is within the contemplation? Not a starting point, just in course of good the morality is considered forwardly.
Aesthetics concerns the higher things, like the arts and beauty and so forth; the values of the personality. Sheer beauty.
The soul is compounded when potent, and conpacted when dense. Dense means compacted. The mass does not increase, but the depth does showing more soul when involved in compacting itself. The mass refers to potency, the volume refers to density. Compacted it stopped at a point, compounded means getting stronger. When something gets denser, potency comes with it normally depending on the amount of substance involved and the longevity of the contemplation. Potent involves the endurance of the contemplation too, and dense involves the depth of content and its compactedness by method of words. Knowledge of sin is concisely compacted, and potent for the endurance of the sole thought. Pact is like a method of coming together and stopping to agree; to become a part of something; letting available the long form of the knowledge and agreeing to the notions therein. Potency is the knowledge that comes forth to the mind, contained, maintained or overt. The mind is expansive, so this potency gets to the presence, and is due to the spiritual feel of environments, and perspectives in relation. Knowledge that is contemplated widespread, and at the fore of the mind, is potent; the compounded interest of the soul. Intelligence is dense without the experience contemplated, but not that potent, for it is just the form of knowledge, and not much compounds but the faculty at work. Density is like the clear form of the knowledge. The form of it, without the experience contained in contemplation isn’t as potent for it is not the content, and this refers to the basic intelligence level of the person. It is the compacted form of the knowledge, without the content considered. The depth compacted to the simplicity of a thought, increases the density of the thought and this is applying density to experience, and having density for thoughts, which is within the knowledge but not in consideration of it. When one considers knowledge like the deeper perspective, the soul becomes more dense, but it is not the density of the object that considers the knowledge, it is the potency, for it refers to the content, and more is compacted as a result of what is compounded.
Secondary authority implies someone get something due to relation, and he’s second in command of the knowledge, so hence, it is secondary authority. Like when someone has cognition of the knowledge that emerges.
A general sense of spirit and speaking or thinking knowledgeably is being coherent.
Ethics are operation of good that underlie the nature. So they are the root causes of good in the being.
Faculties force the expressing of a thought, and contain the general meaning of it and presenting an imperative or necessary. Faculties are soul properties that organize thought; the place wherein thought is organized. Faculties are the containing agents; what grasps the content.
In protest together It is good to devote an excessive amount of time, to allow others to form opinions in longevity of the factors supported. Excessive, but still necessary. To put forth enough time to be extreme, and have time left over, for congregation in intermittence of the protest, to thus continue protesting. Time left over to protest loudly. Excessive, like giving out information and not developing at a benefit, sends a message of devotion in protests that entails it is a process. But basely exuding a test of value which benefits it, without developing is excess. Protest refers to testing something in a beneficial way, like testing the value of something and if you protest something, you have different points of view.
Motions with meaning are measures. Measures are pushes or movements that exert quality. Knowledge mounts up and measures have an amount. It is up in the soul, ascending, and amounts to a quality

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

There is more writing. I give it an a, because of the virtue of the writing.

 

[TheOldSchool]

what a load of horsecrap

 

[Little-Acorn]

Sorry, no do-overs.

Didn't I see you in a Youtube video recently, spouting off about "WINNING!"?

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

i think it is good writing. it is passionate in a way, and inquires into a realistic political point.

 

[HenryBHough]

Bandwidth wasted forever.

Definitely an environmental no-no.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

the writing has quality to it though. it is mature writing, and interesting points are made. It is better than what is out there believe it or not. I can read and assess without prejudice thats all.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Bandwidth wasted forever.

Definitely an environmental no-no.

You didn't enjoy it? I thought bullshit was right up your alley

 

[HenryBHough]

You didn't enjoy it? I thought bullshit was right up your alley

DO write if you get work! But meanwhile, keep on fearing the conservatives lurking behind every busy and under your youth bed. Who knows, there might actually be one!

 

[Little-Acorn]

the writing has quality to it though.

Apparently you didn't find it hard to convince yourself of that.

it is mature writing,

See above comment.

and interesting points are made.

Interesting to the writer, perhaps, as I mentioned above.

I can read and assess without prejudice thats all.

Uh-huh, whatever you say.

Lay off the white stuff.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

whatever, my friends found the writings i have translated to be good enough to be published. it is just the fact that it is better than what is out there, and there is virtue to them.

 

[4thhorsemanzach]

the people of town of course. the city of god.

 

[BlackSand]

The ruling class prevails on a normal basis, whilst the elite lost resource and get weak, for the ruling class has hoarded wealth, and does not give it out because of the selfishness of their nature. The sinful get strength when controlled by sin, due to their insidious aims to make people feel bad, and they succeed, but is it true success? To make sense out of sin is difficult for it grapples the man’s psyche and tousles it around to the experience of death itself. Dissipating morals grow weary the elite, and they can’t serve to the same degree without their resource. Anxiety results and the ruling caste, with their surplus of wealth have a sort of sick contentedness with being strong. What is to say about the elite, and their lack of progression in a world of poverty, sin that doesn’t occur but controls, and death? We haven’t overcome this death yet, conquered its concept, so were left with this feat on our hands, and the only answer that succumbs us is death itself.

We can’t do drastic measures, due to oppressive effects in the world, so how does one just transcend from one location to the source of authority? The mystery recoils in our mind and we assert dignity in remaining lenient with our measures. To hold back and develop, while controlling the government, seems the only answer. Thinking death is possible, and the loss of memory therefrom, is allowing the ruling class to succumb you but it is only rational to consider death possible, or is it? A method to transcend entices us, and the strength of our minds does not truly dissolve. Our morals are intact, and our wit avails us of strategy against the wicked, to make them feel stultified by the indignity of their own means. Hopefully anticipating moves of God, we find ourselves not understanding them when we don’t get recuperated with resource. Why can’t we create these resources by our own means? Exalt us to the benefit of constant success, and let us not hit the downfall of anxiety in its ruthless tendency to sustain pain in the individual. Asinine thinking occurs in the ruling class, and if our authority doesn’t appease them with good feeling they berate our minds to the degree of just wanting that awful rest the creeps up to our minds as a need, an urge. Our definite character sets an example though, and we accomplish when we are needful. If only we could escape to a better situation, where support ameliorates the withdrawal of drugs that enhance us, then we could truly lead the world.


Leadership of the world spiritually has people thinking well, but they evolve inscrutably. They develop perspectives from our evolution and are witnessed for progressing from what they supernaturally sense in the aristocracy. I’ve noticed their progression, and the mediocre have expanded their vocabulary and noticed the linguistics of words. It has helped, and we have spread to the stars our agenda, adapting invitations to certain folk to the source of authority, of which God knows we will get to. They say we will transcend in a way in the minds motion, but leave open opportunity for someone to bring us there by not asserting it except as at some point soon, for we will transcend at some point soon inevitably for it is only rational to determine a being there perfect. It is dutiful support of God, to give us a better situation and allow others to help us by not being too assertively conclusive in their actual thought, not just the motion of their mind, which they say in a way proving we will transcend soon lest they come up with a more profitable agenda. God leaves us thinking all our endeavors have been necessary, and we will never regress to the point of being reset in our revelations. Death can’t stop us, and the dichotomy by method of beauty is merging. The will is for power, like Friedrich says, but is also for specifics, like beauty expressed close to the world. The way we look in our appearance in the soul body and our vague appearance when transcending to the world has people not sensing our grace properly, and wanting to exploit such weaknesses, as a lack of expressed grace in the world, and the clout that results.

Thus we get stronger, by our inherent necessity to overcome. We accumulate strength in our development with resource, our precision to our rhetoric and education and exact it without resource to really test ourselves against the struggle against tyranny; the duplicitous tyranny that revokes opportunity to fix the world, just by refraining to moderate the good agenda into the spectrum of thought. The realm of the mediocre influenced grandly by the ruling class, which has wealth to gain prominence in the world, and withholds their knowledge of good, to assert a poor policy that just masquerades a sinful thought.

Potency is thus anticipated to thus surprise the ruling class, with convincing propriety; propriety as in the conventional standard being met with. Aghast is our reaction to the sinful dilemmas of the ruling class, to avoid chances to be good, for the sake of strength to weaken, which fulfill their ego driven will? How could a will be so devoid of good? Is it their will to weaken, or is it circumstantial to the change in our resource, our privation, the cause of their dismay and recalcitrance, and obvious languishing with strength of mind, due to resource intact to bear upon our minds and be crucial to stop, to overcome. A surprise is wanted. A surprise of effect that results in progression, our mutual will with the ruling caste. To progress invariably in a way that implies success that is drastic change in the will; and we pursue this deliberately, this drastic change.

The will and its character are noted by us. Particulars being achieved and the wills magic to have willed for something in the past to just follow course in the future and achieve it. The essence of the will to accomplish new revelations and elevate new standards, to affect supremacy and mend conflict, is regarded as the beings doing. What it does and the complexity of the character to have a course fateful individualistically different than other fates. The harmony of differences and conjoined wills strengthening forces and combining when one can bine to that level of a point and have something new appear to us.

Bob from hades, which follows with me, thinks people are striven towards their indefinite happiness. Their means do not secure them and it is sort of a variance of thwarted agendas, and a reclaim to authority in new directions, with a conflict of wills and an emergence of an order. To incite lively agendas in a situation controlled and mitigated by the ruling caste. The revolution is private to the aristocracy and those with me, and we revolve when? When we change our political agenda, we revolve to new means that challenges the upmost exertion of strength. The ends reached in the capacity to yield the ends of our capability. To do liberally what we are capable of, what our capacity is at highest extent, and to test our beings fruitfully to live accostedly. The cost of our deeds is considered, and our bargaining of the will religiously to accomplish the want of our beings, which is the mobility of spirit, dead or alive.

Our custom to eat and drink religiously has been counteracted by the necessity to work in the world. We can’t resort to town to just be normal and engage in the activities that regulate social life; the customs. Our customs are faltering, but it is our custom to define new terms, and discuss them. It regulates our will, so it is considered custom. What we are accustomed to doing the unique practices that regulate the will.

From whence do we derive happiness when the will is weak? From grievances of the present, to comfort the being with how it should be, or from the striven will, that exerts an increase of strength. The value in the strenuous effort to overcome and feeling pain to adapt to it, and develop one’s strength so we can cultivate new ideas at the point pain results in greater mobility and demeanor, or in short acceptance.

The will to coincide with a comrade and work together mutually with understanding intact, and reinforcement in relation, to unify ones agenda and make one better is our will. Depreciation of the progress is what hinders us, till we notice our evolution and feel exalted in our means. The discomforting pain without resource, necessary resource, is making us rest though, and the rest is excessive, but the anxiety and the pain require adaption to surmount. We should experience adaption not to the pain, the rancorous pain, but the mode of living without resource that makes us feel better; the noble feeling of not having resource and still being strong. The striven will when one strains his energy is enervated, but is this point of intermittence preceding greater power. The pain lengthens itself due to the psyche of pessimism in the individual, and the feeling of good strengthens itself due to the religious zeal of the patron of his own pain.

So if the pain would discontinue if we were more religious during these times, what is religious? Being more faithful and devout in ones preceding’s seems to entail religion in a way. Adhering to one’s own standard of dogma. If it is advised to stay up, it should be done zealously without reluctance caused by the pain, for the want is to be above the norm. One needs to be greater than how he feels in his pursuit which is felt, and restores good feeling to the being. To not give up, or wait for resource, but to benefit from the times without it is the goal, and morals would proclaim us do something useful, like try to think new thoughts without the resource, to overcome privation

The deleterious influences can be supplanted in their root perspectives of bad. Corrosion of the being and a constant generation of health have bad sustaining itself for longevity. Harmful is their pain, but it doesn’t do true harm to the being. It is just a feeling, without meaning almost, because of the cause being sin; something non-sensual; artificiated pain, a feeling of irritation due to the factors of a painful urge for rest is like not real pain until religious endeavors to turn it into something real. Something with meaning, like we haven’t progressed and it’s necessary to work to rid us of the feeling of pain, morally, so we can exonerate the sinful of their wrongful deeds by creating a benevolent agenda for them. To keep us up, and on guard, until the stimuli of dopamine has our specimen reaching the extraordinary measures that exalt us above bad rest. Is it true, what they say about staying up, and making mobile the spirit, preparing the dead for place of resurrection? If it is, we don’t need resource, and were only deprived when we want it and we intellectualize in relation someone not giving it to us, when it is needed and they have it. If we don’t consider them, and just pursue health, we are granted privileges for our newfound strength.

Pain is a reaction to bad circumstance, and bad in general and it is not the opposite of pleasure. There is such thing as good pain, like the binding of the soul to new concepts, which evolves the soul. If pain were considered good and a factor of ones tested strength, it would be okay to experience, and wouldn’t leave one complaining about his presupposed detriment, his loss of ambition. Having ambition when pained by the bad that surrounds one is what eradicates the pain at root. Believing one can progress steadily with the pain, and morally deriving a solution to deal with the pain until it goes away, by being ambitious and trying new things. If I stay up for a few days, this pain will be surely done away with; abrogated from attention.

So what is the solution to such lack of pleasure, with its great import in the soulmate core deemed sufficient and necessarily willed for at perfect times, to the excessiveness of pain, but making each wealthy. To believe in this political endeavor is to be deemed rationally lofty empirically, but introspection so has it that this is the outcome of all that is surveyed; wealth to the individual. Means are gotten from virtue, and the virtue of the elite is progressing at a rate that the world will no longer be impoverished after death? After death occurs, and pain eliminates itself, the remedy will be at hand in the world of transcendence? It seems to be the case that having a body in the world owes to a lot of pain and people get access to it, causing pain by method of bad. To hold the sinners when transcending gives them no point of causation because of the increased mobility and freedom of transcendence.
After constitutive success and development at a stimulated rate, pain is subsequent. Pain comes in to bring people back to the reality that they are not always superhuman, and need the will of God, or resource to make them stronger sometimes. So when we run out of resource, we have pain due to the enduring success, and the change of pace to normal thought processes, and energy strains that occur in a sin controlled world without proper harmony. One gets use to the success, and when it ceases at that great pace, one initially adapts to the lowered level of success in pain. Our pain doesn’t subside until more resources arrive or the adaption is complete and the comparison justifiable valued for extenuated progression with or without resource, which doesn’t become output in comparison. Then, after adaption or resource, one is back successful again, turning pages and sparking the energy of others; being sociable and gregarious with the energy of resource.

Resource is beneficial but doesn’t last. Supplies run out, and we don’t find ourselves accompanied by that feeling of wealth, but are thrown into needful urges for what the resources have us portend. We are living significantly happy with them, and in misery without them, and the conservatism that has reached deprivation in the world doesn’t avail us, for the liberal agenda of the most high hasn’t been promulgated yet in a speech. To set a policy that makes people reconsider their faulty bargaining skills, or refrain from giving. Let people get drunk! In the streets! That is the task of the liberals, to ensure people do what their nature obliges them to do when free. What is considered when experiencing times of happiness and peace, even the crazy, is what they should do. To kill! The instincts of man sublimated in this text; his recoil into pessimism due to the feeling of weakness that shrouds his true epitome of strength momentarily.

Liberty is something valued to the core. One should not inhibit liberty but it happens frequently due to the rules of governance, and the allotted concern with punishment as a result of the most liberal deeds. The will to destruction is noted as realistic; to destroy what gets in the way of us, our liberty and see ourselves as noble revolutionaries in the process. The reformation of places to make use of them is necessary to enhance peoples living circumstance, and have people get what they truly want, at those liberal moments where they reach the level of on high at fleet and realize such.

What is left for us to do, but leave our situation for a better one? A departure; a leave to the source of authority to make this most liberal agenda a constructivist causing realism is necessary to make ourselves happy with excess in resource, and not reverting tendencies to pain. To develop the world by forcing them to contemplate life with morals accentuated and quality of a being valued for its true good; its essential strength, and its possible strength are differentiated, and the essential strength is made actual by a liberating of the will, to actuate the true decisions that people want to make, to help people as a preference over protocol that is devoid of moral value.

What is the passion of the general individual, which is common to the species of male, but politics? Politics in society, and believing that the situation can be made better; the will can be liberated to emphasize individualistic asset in expression. People seek a domesticated group to be with and spend time with, and minimize their world scheme as a result of numerity in people and normal means of reaching conventional political success, save the revolutionaries, that are left quiet when politics are unpopular.

It is our nature to become something better. Becoming influential while being influential involves new tactics that are advanced, since the last, which resulted in the being. The clout of grace, and death (a meeting of grace) a reaching of one’s individualistic appearance, which gets over the bodily disfigurements or false senses, forced appendages to the appearance of other people’s causation in their depending minds that the spirit overcomes in an instant; governs, but senses the ugly of you that is portrayed in the mind ahead of time, when grace is too extreme, or when the being is in need. Seeing one’s body in a normal sense, for that is what is left, the spirit, the perfect spirit, free from harm dealt physiologically; the calumny of the world to diminish the illusion of grace when it gets so outstanding; the collusion of the bad involved, to deprecate senses of beauty, not possible with the inveterate consequence of death (Inveterate means having a particular way in course that is unlikely to change; an established habit or activity; inveterate refers to veteran, which is professional and established).
Thus the zenith to our values is considered. We value strength, so being stronger seems to the virtuous means to success. We value rest minutely, but strength highly; exertions of strength, the extenuating of causing factors. We think that being strong enough will get us to the absolute. The absolute is the feeling of unification; pain is the division of feeling, and requires forcible physics to amend. Absolutely happy is our will. It is what we want, and power is a feature of this happiness. We will for happiness, and pleasure and orderly productivity and harmony with others, and new ideas, revelations; not just power, for power helps us achieve this, and is like a mediating factor that is primly willed for to bring about happiness. The end can be willed for, not just the means, and it is felt in times of pain and has its energy to move the world in its favor with prayer. Prayer is powerful.

Thus the motive of the present is to get powerful, so we can be happy; power to effect change, so we can have our freedom and not be inhibited or oppressed in poverty. How do we get more power from this standpoint is the question. How can we develop our level of power when we don’t expect it to be developed, except by God’s providence? Must He advance us in the world? Where are we left to advance? Nebulous times of uncertainty in the outcome of our actions have us anticipating death; a drastic change that if nothing happens, is ensured of us. We die to get a new body, and a different, better situation and certain entities don’t like rest when pain is minimalized, like when transcending after death, so they talk and commune. Talking, and merging the dichotomy by a different means, than by method of just the medium keeping us together, and resulting in too much one-sided focus, and not enough difference in philosophy. To solidify after death in the world of treachery is the goal, lest it happens before death with transcendence. How long could it take when our measures achieve happiness and we have conditions for this? I need time with my soulmate, so after I die, assuming I do or did, I will need to talk to her soon, and doing this transcendentally is too obscure for my suiting, so I must solidify if this is too occur, lest it doesn’t happen. We are hopeful, but the beauty is in the spirit and God’s pace has us thinking death is an advantage; an advantage to move more freely, so no one can threaten us, or imprison us to hospitals due to radical power. We can be who we are meant to be, and not worry about death anymore, for it already happened, and now we can’t die! Death as a cursor into futility is a deceit caused by the dead that just want to rest for goodness sake, and not disturb the living. A position in town and a return to town after death is expected though, if I die. Something great is expected in the process before death anyway; a new method of God to cease sin’s hold upon progressive tendencies to cause work that isn’t as progressive. A change of the slowing process, to hasten the prophesy of my life. Where is the next significant check point? What can we expect, when our behavior is so rudely suppressed in social events where we are outgoing? Grace is the clout we need, to have power to change someone’s life with the inveterate magnitude of fortune and its way of extending profit to a certain cause. To have them invest our cause is our goal.

What is prophesy, except segments of life, which were visualized beforehand? What makes prophesy, prophesy, except predetermination to succeed, and destiny to fail? Makes my enemies out to be like characters in a play; actors that are lacking in genuinity so they just get factored in as people of prophesy that are determined by it. They just get factored in, and overcoming them in particular serves to be an asset. The many enemies of this lifestyle, back again to be cruel, for their used to pain, and have the energy to like it. No apprehensive ways about death, just living in the now, in the present, without apprehensions that weaken them. No failures to dwell upon when it seems possible, for they live lives as failures and adapt to the regard of loser, maintaining a strength that makes them feel successful.

Not knowing the end result of my actions has me considering death as a possible, which makes me need knowledge that comes from God; ultimate knowledge, which affects my means. The true knowledge is I will get married at some point in the not too distant future, for I could sense the knowledge of the wedding beforehand, prophetically. Since I know that, I know that my relationship will be absolutely perfect in the future, and Beth will never have to deal with the aggravating tendencies of the unworthy like other females in the world. How lucky! Success granted me, and a God that listens to the prayers I make; the content of what is prayed for is observed faithfully.

Death is just a transition of thinking one way, to thinking another way. So once you’re lifted out of your body, and feel the love of God, you know life is eternally, and you relapse into a comfortable rest where you typically don’t have to speak in certain cases. One can speak when one dies, but knowing absolute heaven will occur, and witnessing work towards it is enough for certain others, who sometimes speak periodically. Like you want to be around someone because of their joy, and success, but don’t like them enough to speak to them, or too many people are speaking to them already, making you not wanting to be an additional factor. When can you prioritize your communication is how these people think that have died, and enjoy the temporary rest. They think in the soul, and if they have the right outlook, their pain is not felt, and they are resting. I would not rest, for I am abnormal in this way, and need things urgently. I would work constantly, until progression to a better situation was made, and this is just a factor of my dignity.

What is the difference between peaceable and peaceful? Peaceable is one can be made to experience peace (prone to peace) and peaceful means one is fulfilled with feelings of peace (generating peace).
The situation of the world is complex. The normal, the mediocre, the free-living atypical thinkers, the purposeless, the constricted purpose had, the ruling caste, the smart, the elite, the scientific, the religious, the followers, the leaders, the petty, the trite, the ignorant, the brave, the assertively bad, the supernatural etc. Many characteristics constitute the world, but the average intelligence of the world is behind the highest evolution, and the past thought, surpasses the present thought, which is a bad sign. So the mediocre, a good portion of the world, become extreme conservatized people, with an illusion of moderation that they superficially take claim to, for it still exists. They stand aside the liberals with prejudice for the answer and solution, and find themselves polarized in their conflict that defends a false or truant standpoint that they don’t really possess except in the course of reluctance empirically when vice. False in the sense that it is not truly wanted; negations in politics accepted empirically, when they make sense as possible politics. Polarity enlightens us about uncertainty. When not deeply concordant in political agenda, it affects uncertainty, and one sided polarization in stance, sometimes prematurely to defend their sensical politics, and be right in debate of what they possess.

Of whom are the supernatural classes? They are those which have a supernatural sense of their environment, and don’t simply sense it normally, of which take claim to this type of keenness that are dichotomized with the worldly individuals that have basic sense, and don’t know the uniqueness of environment consciously in terms acceptance of it; the distanced, and the close; the close carry an illusion of being distanced, since the worldly are the majority in many cases.

How did the world get so conservative, and society become denigrated friendship groups sectarian to the whole of democracy? Because government power kept being augmented to get rid of vice, as the empirical solution, and since bad exists, the world became conservatism-oriented in conformity with the proceedings of government, like their minds were controlled by propaganda and merchandise in the world. As though polarities controlled their minds with what they propagate and caused a pitted rebellion between two fictitiously created sides (their report was of fictitious character; not a realistic side) to create new age moderation, which is a recoiling from fascism, and a stray from anarchy.

What a complicated and dreary thesis marred and mangled with misgivings and overly simplistic characterizations that fail to pay appropriate homage to the only true path of enlightenment and honest reward.

You speak so often of the death and decay “we” experience as the result of a few factors … To include the opportunity of resource, willingness to share and responsibility to one another.
It is all based in a “we' mode with an emphasis on cooperation among the masses … After you identify certain measures you believe hold the individual being in a pattern of failure or fruitless endeavor.
It is an attempt to trade one false God for another … There is no force that can serve all without sacrifice in one form or another.

An individual cannot truly choose the sacrifice of another then mark it as appropriate ... Because it is not their sacrifice to be given or judged.
What “we” do is not a matter of character or the ability for any one person to transcend … It is only what the one person does … Their sacrifice … That is the true measure of their character.
Government does not replace the responsibility of one person to do what they can for the next … It only invites corruption into an otherwise accountable measure of individual good.

If your desire is to encourage group transcendence as a society … Then you have successfully ignored your personal responsibility to act in a beneficial way towards others.
You cannot fix everything … But you can fix what is in front of you.

Even in Christianity … God does not call for anyone to envy or desire what another has.
The Lord does not encourage the idea of society providing a means by which to distribute His gifts.
His blessing fall upon those who please Him … And through their actions … Not what they can get their neighbors to do.

If you truly want to understand the ability to transcend with dignity, honor and the blessing of these attributes … You must first understand these are all gifts you essentially give yourself through your own actions.

.