Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

“We Got Him This Time” - Episode 1,178
‘In a newly unsealed court filing, special counsel Jack Smith provided the most detailed picture yet of his criminal case against Donald Trump for allegedly trying to overturn the 2020 election and why the former president isn’t immune from prosecution.
[…]
“When the defendant lost the 2020 presidential election, he resorted to crimes to try to stay in office," the special counsel's team writes. "With private co-conspirators, the defendant launched a series of increasingly desperate plans to overturn the legitimate election results in seven states that he had lost.”
[…]
“At its core, the defendant’s scheme was a private criminal effort," the special counsel writes. "In his capacity as a candidate, the defendant used deceit to target every stage of the electoral process.”’

 
AnyDaay3.webp
 
Trump is in serious trouble.

Prosecutors lay out new evidence in Trump election case, accuse him of having ‘resorted to crimes’​

Donald Trump laid the groundwork to try to overturn the 2020 election even before he lost, knowingly pushed false claims of voter fraud and “resorted to crimes” in his failed bid to cling to power, according to a newly unsealed court filing from prosecutors that offers new evidence from the landmark criminal case against the former president.

The filing from special counsel Jack Smith’s team offers the most comprehensive view to date of what prosecutors intend to prove if the case charging Trump with conspiring to overturn the election reaches trial. Though a months-long congressional investigation and the indictment itself have chronicled in stark detail Trump’s efforts to undo the election, the filing cites previously unknown accounts offered by Trump’s closest aides to paint a portrait of an “increasingly desperate” president who while losing his grip on the White House “used deceit to target every stage of the electoral process.”

“So what?” the filing quotes Trump as telling an aide after being advised that his vice president, Mike Pence, had been rushed to a secure location after a crowd of violent Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 to try to prevent the counting of electoral votes.

“The details don’t matter,” Trump said, when told by an adviser that a lawyer who was mounting his legal challenges wouldn’t be able to prove the false allegations in court, the filing states.

 
Happy October Surprise!

You pitiful losers better hope it’s the only one. But, now you have to hear about it day

After day..After day..After day..After day

For the rest of the month.

Have Fun!


:spinner:
 
Trump is in serious trouble.

Prosecutors lay out new evidence in Trump election case, accuse him of having ‘resorted to crimes’​

Donald Trump laid the groundwork to try to overturn the 2020 election even before he lost, knowingly pushed false claims of voter fraud and “resorted to crimes” in his failed bid to cling to power, according to a newly unsealed court filing from prosecutors that offers new evidence from the landmark criminal case against the former president.

The filing from special counsel Jack Smith’s team offers the most comprehensive view to date of what prosecutors intend to prove if the case charging Trump with conspiring to overturn the election reaches trial. Though a months-long congressional investigation and the indictment itself have chronicled in stark detail Trump’s efforts to undo the election, the filing cites previously unknown accounts offered by Trump’s closest aides to paint a portrait of an “increasingly desperate” president who while losing his grip on the White House “used deceit to target every stage of the electoral process.”

“So what?” the filing quotes Trump as telling an aide after being advised that his vice president, Mike Pence, had been rushed to a secure location after a crowd of violent Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 to try to prevent the counting of electoral votes.

“The details don’t matter,” Trump said, when told by an adviser that a lawyer who was mounting his legal challenges wouldn’t be able to prove the false allegations in court, the filing states.

🥱

You gullible libturd rubes will buy anything.
 
Is that like Hillary challenging the Michigan vote in 2016?

When in doubt. When your have cogent, logical argument left to make. When have nothing but shit to say. BRING HRC.

HRC has nothing to do with this, you make chicken shit argument and try to turn into chicken soup.

You are truly sad, sick, pathetic little man.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Wokespy??

Too funny...but i guess that's the best ya can do~


Uh, shooting the messenger again, typical leftoids. Polling shows Latinos are leaving the Dems.

BTW, this poll is linked in the OP. How sad for you, having played attack the source. :auiqs.jpg:

 
How is it possible for a judge to release evidence to the media before a freaking trial? Is it crazy time when another judge put a gag order on Trump so he couldn't defend himself in the media?

Evidence has not been released.
 
When in doubt. When your have cogent, logical argument left to make. When have nothing but shit to say. BRING HRC.

HRC has nothing to do with this, you make chicken shit argument and try to turn into chicken soup.

You are truly sad, sick, pathetic little man.
So, you can't explain the Democrat hypocrisy. No big surprise, really.
 
Not a surprise to anyone following the events in the court.

And not a surprise to any normal human who understands Trump is running to interfere with these trials.

No.
None of these cases would have gone forward if Trump had gone away after 2020. All of this has been political, and it gives us a front row seat to Stalinistic tactics.
 
Uh, shooting the messenger again, typical leftoids. Polling shows Latinos are leaving the Dems.
No..it show that the percentage of those voting for Harris may not be equal to the percentage other candidates have received in past years..it also shows that the majority of Latino voters will be voting Dem and that Trump trails by double-digits.
Just a projection though..and might not even be true, once we see the election results.

Allow me to post the actual source your rag used:

 
None of these cases would have gone forward if Trump had gone away after 2020.
Wrong, of course. They were long underway before Trump declared his candidacy early in an effort to interfere with them.

The fact that he was a president is the reason they took too long.

So, wrong on every level.
 
15th post
Smith didn’t release it. So the thread headline is inaccurate from jump street.

And it isn’t “evidence.” It consists of contentions and claims. So the thread headline is doubly wrong.

Also, Jackoff Smith is a douchebag and was probably not validly appointed which should nullify every ******* action he took including convening any grand juries. That ought to nullify those indictments, anyway.

And, the scope of the SCOTUS immunity decision does probably validate any such prosecution anyway. It wasn’t private person Trump challenging the outcome; it was President Trump performing a Presidential duty to insure that the election had properly proceeded — which he did not believe it had.
 
Jack Smith should crawl back under the bridge he came from.
The bum looks like a meth-head, and he has no standing as an unappointed prosecutor.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom