Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

[whitehall]

"Vivid detail" as opposed to ordinary testimony? A bit dramatic even for left wing Politico but typical of the desperation on the left these days

 

[0311]

Does it?

Not even close.

 

[daveman]

In Trumplandia.

In what normal peope call reality, the mountain of evidence convinced grand juries ro indict.

You bet, Comrade.

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Smith's evidence:

ORANGE MAN BAD

I bet Smith has been promised the AG job.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You bet, Comrade.

Haha, poor Dave knows, like, 8 words.

 

[daveman]

Haha, poor Dave knows, like, 8 words.

I know many words. I'm just trying to keep them down to your level.

 

[Care4all]

In other words you are full of shit. There is no named source. It’s just more jerkoff material for leftards and they know it.

What were his actual “criminal actions”? Turning to an aid and saying something you didn’t like?
Allegedly. From an anonymous source.

That is what you have so far.

I'm not full of shit, but I was WRONG.

I just got the link and began reading it and on page 8, beginning on 7 for full context going thru page 9 of the document....it mentions, Make the Riot happen! Like the Brooks Brother's riot at the Miami tabulating center.... Page 8

And it was not Trump that said this or didn't appear to be, it was his campaign staff...they redacted names in the document... so no names

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148/gov.uscourts.dcd.258148.252.0.pdf

 

[0311]

This is the "October Surprise" of all "October Surprises". Every goddamned day this will be in the news, This the political water torture for Diaper Don.

What Smith outlines are in no way "Presidential Duties", but acts desperate man trying to avoid being thrown out of office. He was acting as a private citizen, NOT the president. This falls after his Disastrous Debate Debacle with Kamala Harris. Smith's filings spell out what he did, when he did and how he did. I love it

 

[Cassandro]

Jack Smith lays out his case against Trump in vivid detail​

In a newly unsealed legal brief, the special counsel revealed private, detailed conversations Trump had with GOP officials in his bid to subvert the 2020 election.

By Kyle Cheney
10/02/2024 05:22 PM EDT

As his bid to hold on to power in 2020 grew increasingly desperate, Donald Trump pressed Republican Party chair Ronna McDaniel to help promote a false claim that voting machines in Michigan had been manipulated.
McDaniel balked. She had spoken to the state’s House speaker, a Republican, who told her the claim was “******* nuts.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/02/jack-smith-trump-case-00182258

That detail was among a dossier of evidence unfurled Wednesday in a newly released legal brief by special counsel Jack Smith. The 165-page filing offers the most detailed look at Smith’s case charging Donald Trump with orchestrating multiple criminal conspiracies in his failed quest to subvert Joe Biden’s victory.

Is that like Hillary challenging the Michigan vote in 2016?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And a month before the election, what a surprise!

 

[DigitalDrifter]

This is the "October Surprise" of all "October Surprises". Every goddamned day this will be in the news, This the political water torture for Diaper Don.

What Smith outlines are in no way "Presidential Duties", but acts desperate man trying to avoid being thrown out of office. He was acting as a private citizen, NOT the president. This falls after his Disastrous Debate Debacle with Kamala Harris. Smith's filings spell out what he did, when he did and how he did. I love it

So you're admitting it's all political! Thank you!!

 

[Manonthestreet]

If you beliebe that inane codswallop , you are a MAGA patsy. There is no evidence that either of the would be assassins were anything other that mentally distrurbed loose cannons

The rest of the post is just to stupids to comment on

Why do you hate science

 

[MarathonMike]

View attachment 1021080

Oh now I remember! He's the guy who looks like Hunter's body double. No idea what your cartoon means.

 

[Luckyone]

Oh now I remember! He's the guy who looks like Hunter's body double. No idea what your cartoon means.

It means that Jack Smith is going to lop off Trump's head.

 

[Vrenn]

Wow, talk about bad timing for Trump. This was an answer to the Supreme Courts ruling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And a month before the election, what a surprise!

Not a surprise to anyone following the events in the court.

And not a surprise to any normal human who understands Trump is running to interfere with these trials.

 

[Rambunctious]

Ooh, very damning statement, page 15.

White House staffer traveling with the defendant, overheard him tell family members that “it doesn't matteifyou won or lost the election. You sill have to fight like hell

LOL bullshit... a white house staffer??? give me a break... probably a leftover Obama hack.... I'd like to see Smith try and put that into the evidence folder...
But that's what I mean by Smith is committing treason... hear say evidence... judge shopping... made up laws... and innuendo... if you want to use those tactics against say a scarface then fine... but to use them to take out a president is treason in my opinion....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LOL bullshit... a white house staffer??? give me a break... probably a leftover Obama hack.... I'd like to see Smith try and put that into the evidence folder...
But that's what I mean by Smith is committing treason... hear say evidence... judge shopping... made up laws... and innuendo... if you want to use those tactics against say a scarface then fine... but to use them to take out a president is treason in my opinion....

Haha, poor Trumpers. Literally too sissy to face facts.

 

[daveman]

LOL bullshit... a white house staffer??? give me a break... probably a leftover Obama hack.... I'd like to see Smith try and put that into the evidence folder...
But that's what I mean by Smith is committing treason... hear say evidence... judge shopping... made up laws... and innuendo... if you want to use those tactics against say a scarface then fine... but to use them to take out a president is treason in my opinion....

 

[okfine]

Sure does. Dispose only has one definition. It isn't ambiguous.

Details. You should just laugh it off instead of getting so damned butthurt.