Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

'Make Them Riot' Politico Pulls 6 Key Details From Jack Smith's Massive Trump Filing.


Special counsel Jack Smith's massive new filing with new evidence against former President Donald Trump contains at least six telling revelations, according to a breaking analysis.

Politico legal affairs reporter Kyle Cheney shared on X Wednesday afternoon his immediate takeaways on the 165-page document Smith filed moments earlier in Washington D.C. federal court.

In the filing, Smith asserts his case against the former president within the context of the Supreme Court ruling that Trump enjoyed partial presidential immunity in the lead-up to the U.S. Capitol riots on Jan. 6, 2021.
R.0c0bdb94a54c6b0bdca6cc4a988c6bc0
 
Smith is a ******* hack... I hope Trump's new AG makes Smith's life a living hell....
They probably won't get a conviction against Smith, but they can certainly ruin him financially. Force him to spend every penny he has paying lawyers to defend him, until he's living in the street.
 
Uh no, Trump is a criminal hack & this latest filing proves that.

But as a consolation prize MAGA will always have the stink of Trump's ass on their face to console them.
I want Smith disbarred and jailed for treason....
 
Trump is friggin trash who hates what this country stands for. The Orange toon should be sent to jail and the key thrown away for what he has put this country through.
 
Last edited:
They probably won't get a conviction against Smith, but they can certainly ruin him financially. Force him to spend every penny he has paying lawyers to defend him, until he's living in the street.
Except Smith would be defended by the full resources of the DOJ.

Even if the orange slob is president.

What an odd display that would be.

But it's stupid and won't happen, so no worries.
 
15th post
:auiqs.jpg:Uh no, Trump is a criminal hack & this latest filing proves that.

But as a consolation prize MAGA will always have the stink of Trump's ass on their face to console them.

But the prosecutors promise not to name names.

To protect the integrity of proceedings and to protect lesser-known witnesses, the prosecutors said they intended in their public filing to redact specific names and use job titles to give context to the information being referenced.

The kinds of identifiers being proposed by prosecutors include, according to their filing: “Campaign Manager”, “Arizona’s Governor”, “Senior Campaign Advisor”, “executive assistant”, “the Defendant’s Chief of Staff”, “Georgia Attorney General” and “Chairwoman of the Republican National Committee”.

And the lawyers clutch their pearls…

On Tuesday, Trump’s lawyers bitterly complained that the redactions were so specific that it would make public identification of the witnesses easy, accusing prosecutors of trying to damage Trump’s presidential campaign with fewer than five weeks until election day.
 
Except Smith would be defended by the full resources of the DOJ.

Even if the orange slob is president.

What an odd display that would be.

But it's stupid and won't happen, so no worries.
The DOJ isn't going to defend Jack Smith for committing crimes. It don't work that way.
 
The DOJ isn't going to defend Jack Smith for committing crimes. It don't work that way.
I thought you meant being sued.

Smith didn't commit any crimes.

Mountains of evidence against Trump: "No crimes!

No evidence against Jack Smith: "He should go to jail!"

Trump has turned his cultists' brains to diarrhea.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom