Politico Breaking: Jack Smith Lays Out His Case Against Trump In Vivid Detail.

[Frankenstein]

Irrelevant.

You said: "Putin wasn't in Ukraine before idiot"

I pointed out that Putin invaded Ukraine prior to the current action.

Enough sealioning.

WW

I was referencing someones attempt to blame Trump in post 426 asshat

 

[WorldWatcher]

I was referencing someones attempt to blame Trump in post 426 asshat

Thank you for confirming the Putin has previously invaded Ukranie.

Appreciate it.

WW

 

[Vrenn]

I was referencing someones attempt to blame Trump in post 426 asshat

There is a lot of blame to go around.

 

[JimH52]

View attachment 1021128

You people want to re-elect a man that was okay with his VP being hung. A man who when told his words may cause violence replied...."Let them riot."

 

[Independent thinker]

Key takeaways from special counsel Jack Smith's major filing in Trump's 2020 election case

Judge Tanya Chutkan unsealed an expansive new filing in special counsel Jack Smith's case against former President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C.

www.cbsnews.com

When told Pence's life was in danger...he replied..."So what." When he was told his continued lies about voter fraud may cause violence, he replied...."Let them riot."

trump is a very sick man.

Funny how they are laying out the very same details they already have been, immediately after Walz's debate loss and just one month before the election. It I had a suspicious mind, I'd be thinking Democrats were trying to influence the election.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Funny how they are laying out the very same details they already have been

False.

 

[Frankenstein]

Thank you for confirming the Putin has previously invaded Ukranie.

Appreciate it.

WW

Cool, wasn't the issue at hand

 

[ThisIsMe]

Voting against an orange rapist you watched, heard, and read commit crimes is due process.

Why don't you believe in due process?

No, it’s not due process lol, that’s accusations and public opinion.

Due process is to take all that stuff and try it in a court of law. You know this, why even suggest it’s not?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, it’s not due process lol, that’s accusations and public opinion.

Voting is definitely due process. Informed.voting? Even more so.

And you forgot to mention, it's also video and audio and correspondence.

Weird that you forgot. Not really.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Voting is definitely due process. Informed.voting? Even more so.

And you forgot to mention, it's also video and audio and correspondence.

Weird that you forgot. Not really.

Huh? Where the hell are you going with this. We went from due process to voting. Are you suggesting that people have a right to hear a one sided opinion that has not been proven in a court of law?

That’s the whole point of innocent until proven guilty. It doesn’t matter what you’ve heard, or what you believe, he’s not guilty until they go through that process, which is why it was wrong for Chutkan to release those documents. She should know better, but public opinion is just as powerful, so they release it.

This should be looked into as election interference, it really should

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We went from due process to voting.

Voters voting is due process.

The court of public.opinion matters.

Nobody changed lanes. You are just trying to find a way to say the world is being unfair to Trump. And you're failing at that.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Voters voting is due process.

The court of public.opinion matters.

Nobody changed lanes. You are just trying to find a way to say the world is being unfair to Trump. And you're failing at that.

Well, if we’re being honest, the left has been unfair to Trump for over 9 years now

But we’re talking about different due process, I’m speaking in the legal sense. But what you are talking about is unproven and untested allegations. There is no legal weight until proven in court. Public opinion is just that..opinion, and someone releasing unproven information in a circumstance like this, is tantamount to election interference, and is reckless, and since chutkan released this information without it being adjudicated in court for the purpose of smearing a candidate and influencing public opinion, not only is it election interference, it’s defamation, which is something we know a lot about recently, right ?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, if we’re being honest, the left has been unfair to Trump for over 9 years now

First time following politics?

Must be.

But we’re talking about different due process, I’m speaking in the legal sense.

Which is odd, since i don't see anyone from the Judicial branch trying to sentence Trump before he is convicted of anything.

Do you actually to think anyone here believes otherwise? No.

The only election interference was the criminal defendant declaring his candidacy early to interfere with his criminal trials, in hopes of denying an informed decision to the voters.

 

[DonGlock26]

Jack who?

Garland's cabin boy.

 

[WEATHER53]

Trump is guilty of the zealots feeling about what Trumps thoughts were and therefore anything that happened to occur was The results of Trumps thoughts .
It crazy cart before horse

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Garland's cabin boy.

The war crimes prosecutor?

The fat orange rapist is a halfwit lightweight, compared to Jack Smith.

 

[you can't hurt ham]

You got him now!

 

[DonGlock26]

The war crimes prosecutor?

The fat orange rapist is a halfwit lightweight, compared to Jack Smith.

Uh huh....

‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

Special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought federal charges against former President Donald Trump, is an “overzealous” prosecutor who relies on ethically dubious tactics, including media leaks and enticing witnesses, say those who have been caught in his snare.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Uh huh....

‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

Special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought federal charges against former President Donald Trump, is an “overzealous” prosecutor who relies on ethically dubious tactics, including media leaks and enticing witnesses, say those who have been caught in his snare.

www.washingtontimes.com

Oh look, an article you didn't read.

Yes, the fat rapist charity thief felon insurrectionist who couldn't spell "insurrection" if his life depended on it is a lightweight, compared to Smith.

The orange rapist is the kind of loser Jack Smith cuts deals with for testimony to reel in bigger fish.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Those words were just cover my ass bullshit, He also said "fight like hell" and "it will be wild"

There are hundreds of examples of democrats using the same or far more inflammatory language.