That would not be why you are called a racist.
Good to know, but the previous statement of yours is pure racism:
American history shows that whites created a violent, unsafe, dysfunctional nation because they enforced white racial preferences.
The "Whites" who settled in the American colonies never
enforced white
racial preference - white superiority in general was an indisputable fact. As such they shot and murdered everything that stood in their way or was deemed to be threatening towards their own existence and well being. Just as the e.g. Ashanti behaved towards other Black tribes along the Ivory coast, the Zulu against other Bantu and non-Bantu tribes or Indian Maharajas subjugating their
own race and population - right into slavery.
Slavery was abolished due to the English having found out that "enforcing minimum payed labor onto former slaves" was far better suitable to enhance their profits then via slavery. Huge additional numbers of cheap White labor via immigrants from Europe arriving in the USA - made the industrial North realize, that these
enforced minimal wages onto Whites, ensured far better profits then the output produced via Black slaves. So free Black's and former Black slaves in the North lost their jobs (existence) to cheap White labor.
The rural - agricultural South did not have those numbers of cheap and desperate Whites, being totally depended on minimum paid labor in order to survive, - and as such continued laboring their plantations with slaves.
There was
never a
racial preference for Whites in the USA, especially not one granted or implemented via laws. Slaves - (no matter which race, or what country) had no rights - as such there was also no need to enforce a racial preference for Whites in the USA.
After having lost their struggle/war for an independent South, aka Confederacy, and as such all slaves being
free, (since 150 years), the Whites in the South however did institute laws to protect their own culture and society from Blacks via the
segregation of races - in order to e.g. prevent Blacks from sitting in the same school, right down to riding in the same bus or sitting in the same restaurant. Such a racial segregation does
not constitute a racial preference for Whites - but simply a racial segregation. There was no law that would have forbidden Blacks to open up their own elite schools, get their own super busses or open up their own Michelin 3 star restaurants or any other restaurant (see e.g. James Brown initially performing in Black run and Black owned pubs and restaurants).
And none of those White immigrants was thrown money at, or received free credits or social welfare, or free integration and language courses, in order to get his own new life or business in the USA started. Neither those Whites born in the USA:
Henry Ford born July 30, 1863, was one of eight children of William and Mary Ford. He was born on the family farm near Dearborn, Michigan (a slave free state). Ford attended a one-room school for eight years when he was not helping his father with the harvest. At age 16 (1879) he walked to Detroit to find work in its machine shops.
It is however indisputable the Blacks nature and trait, to constantly try to enter and seek refuge and comfort in the White society - e.g. in former Rhodesia or South-Africa. Or Blacks desperately wanting to sit in a White restaurant or pub - I am not aware of Whites starting to demonstrate or creating havoc in order to sit in a Black school or a Black pub. How come? - keep asking yourself - HOW COME?
Since the mid 70's there is no more racial segregation in the USA - Blacks can now sit in any restaurant or attend any school. - so what is the problem now?
And there are
no racial preference laws in place, that would e.g. state, that for a job vacancy a White needs to be preferred towards other races - you are just making up stuff, and if you can't get your false accusations to seed into fertile ground -
racists like you will come up with "former" slavery. (150 years ago!!) and supposed White racial preference.