www.wzzm13.com
www.woodtv.com
wwmt.com
Cops will back the cop in almost every circumstance so that's not a good indicator.Police union backs officer in Patrick Lyoya killing
The Grand Rapids Police Officers Association called Lyoya's death “tragic” but said an “officer has the legal right to protect themselves and community."
cops back him up all the way. it was justifiable.
No, they are still awaiting forensics thus no decision has yet been made to even take it to a grand jury much less charge him outright.Kent County prosecutor gets Patrick Lyoya case
Three and half weeks after Patrick Lyoya was shot and killed by a Grand Rapids police officer, the case is in the hands of the Kent County prosecutor, but he says he needs more information before h…
and there already having issues getting a trial underway.
it was.
it was justifiable. guy had warrants and driving on suspended license. thats why he acted like he did.
Unless you could show the officer was aware of his prior history it would not be relevant to the shooting.Patrick Lyoya's criminal record "irrelevant," family attorney says
Patrick Lyoya's driver's license was revoked and a warrant was out for his arrest when a Grand Rapids police officer killed him during a traffic stop, state records show. An arrest warrant was issued out of the City of Wyoming on April 1 in connection to a domestic violence allegation,according...
told you he had a record. this is why he acted the way he did,. driving on a revoked license had a warrant, . there trying to get this record tossed out as evidence. lieing and saying he didnt have record. bs. lieing parents.
That determination cannot be made until all of the evidence is in.
it explaind why the black guy acted they way he did. sure as shooting.
You're talking out of your ass. There's no evidence to suggest he was even aware of that warrant which had only been issued 3 days prior.
sure it can, guy hd record and everything. dirving on suspended license a warrent. didnt want to go to jail.
Your explanation is not factual nor would it ever be accepted by a court.
it dosent matter. about it explains why the black guy acted the way he did . wanted. did not wan to go to jail. simple.
are you a lawyer? just in denial more likely.
it was justified because the dud e was trying to get the cops tazer and wouldnt stop.
It can't explain anything since there's no reason to believe he was even aware of the warrant issued just 3 days prior.
I'm an expert on the use of force. Lawyers pay me to examine cases looking for justification or to prove there was none.
