police have done everything right

harmonica

Diamond Member
Sep 1, 2017
43,841
20,012
2,300
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
 
Last edited:
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
Shooting people in the back is wrong even if it is a retard
 
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
Shooting people in the back is wrong even if it is a retard
....no----it's not like the movies..this guy is a total dangerous threat--to the cops and kids
 
Shooting an unarmed man in the back is never right. It is the act of a coward and a fool.
So if a man is running at your children and he is about to stab them, your official position is to not shoot him in the back?
 
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
Shooting people in the back is wrong even if it is a retard
''retards'' can be a threat/dangerous/kill
..and that is a bigoted term--you must be a bigot
 
The police did everything right? Awesome. So the FBI warrants that were based upon lies to the FISA court were awesome too? Because the Police do everything right. Or do they only do everything right when killing Black people?
 
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
Shooting people in the back is wrong even if it is a retard
''retards'' can be a threat/dangerous/kill
..and that is a bigoted term--you must be a bigot
If the cop had any balls he would have waited like a man.

I would have shot the retard in the face and everyone would have seen the knife. Facial expressions are precious you know
 
....the JBlake case is similar to the Alton Sterling case--the police did everything right
...they DID try non-lethal means
...a key aspect of these incidents is --they are not MOVIES!!!!!

in the ASterling case:
...police sent to check on a possible crime/etc
--do they get out and start shooting?--no
--they tell him to put his hands on a car hood--Sterling does NOT COMPLY with this SIMPLE command..do the cops shoot him?? no

..next, the cops try to grab him and he -----STRUGGLES with them
do they shoot him ?? no

..he finally puts his hands on the hood, but then resists--again---
do they shoot NOW---NO

...they try to taser him--it doesn't work--he still fights [ knowing he has a pistol!]
-do they shoot him NOW??? NO!!!!!!!!!

...they have used all non-lethal means possible
..he CONTINUES to fight/struggle [ like Blake ]
..they finally see his pistol and HAVE to shoot

..these crazy criminals continue to fight and struggle after non-lethal means attempted

..ESCALATING the THREAT--they will not STOP!!! never stopping fighting/resisting..
Shooting people in the back is wrong even if it is a retard
''retards'' can be a threat/dangerous/kill
..and that is a bigoted term--you must be a bigot
If the cop had any balls he would have waited like a man.

I would have shot the retard in the face and everyone would have seen the knife. Facial expressions are precious you know
wait for the guy to put a knife to a kid's throat??????!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top