- Jan 19, 2010
- 83,977
- 84,427
- 3,605
Dems stole the 2020 election... when are you going to learn that...But Trump’s your daddy despite trying to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election and take away the people’s will to vote him out of office.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dems stole the 2020 election... when are you going to learn that...But Trump’s your daddy despite trying to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election and take away the people’s will to vote him out of office.
Donald Trump, during his presidency, did revoke the security clearance of John Brennan, who served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under President Barack Obama.Source?
Look, asshole, any jury that is made from this lie will be one handpicked by Trump. Gabbard has lied to stay in her spot. If Obama is sent to prison because of this charade, expect MAGATS to get hurt. You're a member of a twisted cult of fascists who will make things up to stop opposition and to stay in power. DO NOT even try this gasighting bullshit with me *****.
Trump was correct in all his assessments.
Gabbard has lawyers within the DNI who most likely have verified all the documents before she released them.
You got him now……LolollllolCorrupt Dems are in deep shit!
In what way? Elaborate in specific details!!If Obama is sent to prison because of this charade, expect MAGATS to get hurt.
For most federal conspiracy cases, the statute of limitations is five years from the date of the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. This means that the government has five years from that date to initiate prosecution.How about a criminal conspiracy that last for years?
For most federal conspiracy cases, the statute of limitations is five years from the date of the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. This means that the government has five years from that date to initiate prosecution.
Well not according to the Director of National IntelThe OP doesnt have any idea what they’re talking about, just like you.
The declassified stuff doesn’t amount to anything.
Riiiight all those Obama DOCUMENTS are fake am I right. You seriously suck at defending Dems.The whole thing is a crock of shit
I'd ask you what you are blabbering about but nobody cares really.You got him now……Lolollllol

Dear Lord......are you 12?I'd ask you what you are blabbering about but nobody cares really.![]()
No need to, you already proved how dumb you are in front of the whole forum.Explain.
Then go after Jack Smith.The key point being the last overt act. When did the Democrat Party's last overt act to deny Trump of his civil rights take place? Jack Smith's prosecution or the prosecution in NY?
lmaoBut Trump’s your daddy despite trying to reverse the outcome of the 2020 election and take away the people’s will to vote him out of office.

This was a nit-pick because the intelligent estimate said “high confidence” and the Obama administration acted like it was true.
That’s really pathetic.
Gabbard’s bombshell is pretty much bullshit. As far as I can tell, she’s conflating the idea that Russia hacked election infrastructure to change votes (which the administration never said) and the idea that Russia used internet hacking to influence the election, which is true and we all know it (unless you’re a total hack).
The tRumpling's latest attempt to distract you from the Epstein thing.