🚨Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announces she has STRIPPED the security clearances of:

They weren't. The government didn't instruct any social media website to do anything about the laptop story.

They pressured them. Everybody knows that. Zuckerberg even admitted it and said he regretted the decision to give in to the pressure.
 
They pressured them. Everybody knows that. Zuckerberg even admitted it and said he regretted the decision to give in to the pressure.
There was plenty of pressure to take down COVID misinformation since, you know, that leads to people dying.

No one said anything about the laptop story which was super shady from the get go.
 
Good!

Strip all these Obama/Biden hacks of their security clearances.


Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announces she has STRIPPED the security clearances of:
    • Antony Blinken
    • Jake Sullivan
    • Lisa Monaco
    • Mark Zaid
    • Norman Eisen
    • Letitia James
    • Alvin Bragg
    • Andrew Weissman
    • 51 signers of the Hunter Biden "disinformation" letter






I never really understood why state and local officials need a federal security clearance.
 
There was plenty of pressure to take down COVID misinformation since, you know, that leads to people dying.

No one said anything about the laptop story which was super shady from the get go.

The laptop story was proven to be true and the Russian disinformation misinformation signed by those national security "experts" was proven to be false. "Super shady" should be a trademark of the Democratic Party. Nearly every stance they take is proven to be incorrect.
 
The laptop story was proven correct and the Russian disinformation misinformation signed by those national security "experts" was proven to be incorrect. "Super shady" should be a trademark of the Democratic Party. Nearly every stance they take is proven to be incorrect.
It started super shady, doubly so because Giuliani wouldn’t let any normal news agencies examine it.

Hell, even the hacks at the NY Post thought it was shady.

 
It started super shady, doubly so because Giuliani wouldn’t let any normal news agencies examine it.

Hell, even the hacks at the NY Post thought it was shady.


Democrats were wrong on both accounts. They falsely labeled the OPINIONS on laptop story misinformation and didn't label the OPINIONS of the "experts" as misinformation, in fact, they promoted that one.

You likely bought both and amazingly continue to believe the nonsense the party spews. Much of it will be proven wrong again and again but you will still believe most of what they tell you. Amazing.
 
Democrats were wrong on both accounts. They falsely labeled the OPINIONS on laptop story misinformation and didn't label the OPINIONS of the "experts" as misinformation, in fact, they promoted that one.

You likely bought both and amazingly continue to believe the nonsense the party spews. Much of it will be proven wrong again and again but you will still believe most of what they tell you. Amazing.
Nobody’s perfect, but they were hardly being irrational. The laptop turned out to be a non-story anyway. The entire conversation was about whether the laptop was real rather than anything incriminating on it.

Hell, Giuliani made a big fuss about claiming it had child pornography on it but that was never true.
 
Nobody’s perfect, but they were hardly being irrational. The laptop turned out to be a non-story anyway. The entire conversation was about whether the laptop was real rather than anything incriminating on it.

Not true at all. Many polls were taken after the 2020 election that showed that a rather large percentage of voters would have changed their vote had they known about the laptop. If the percentages held across the entire voting population, enough the change a very close election. The blocking of the story was very consequential to the election and to our country. It very well may have led to the last 4 years of corruption, massive spending, inflation and world chaos because it very may well have saved Biden.

I would also argue, as would most Americans, that the correspondence found on the laptop gave an appearance of impropriety. The "big guy" was very likely Biden. It also shed a brighter light on Hunter's dealings in Ukraine and with Burisma. Most reasonable people, excluding MSNBC watchers, are now able to admit that Hunter, the crack head, didn't just happen to get that job. That is a monumental stretch. It is a very small stretch to believe that his dad was involved in some way.
 
"Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard revoked security clearances from the 51 ‘spies who lied,’
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announced Monday she has revoked the security clearances of former top Biden administration officials as well as the 51 former intelligence officials who signed the letter calling the Hunter Biden laptop Russian disinformation.

She also announced that former President Joe Biden is no longer receiving the President’s Daily Brief, a summary of intelligence regarding issues and events around the world.

She posted:

Per @POTUS directive, I have revoked security clearances and barred access to classified information for Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Lisa Monaco, Mark Zaid, Norman Eisen, Letitia James, Alvin Bragg, and Andrew Weissman, along with the 51 signers of the Hunter Biden “disinformation” letter. The President’s Daily Brief is no longer being provided to former President Biden."





This is way overdue. You can always trust a Democrat to lie and leak.

This is the letter in question.

This is a paragraph from that letter.

We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement


So, explain what they lied about?
 
The laptop story was proven to be true and the Russian disinformation misinformation signed by those national security "experts" was proven to be false. "Super shady" should be a trademark of the Democratic Party. Nearly every stance they take is proven to be incorrect.
We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement

From that letter.
 
Not true at all. Many polls were taken after the 2020 election that showed that a rather large percentage of voters would have changed their vote had they known about the laptop. If the percentages held across the entire voting population, enough the change a very close election. The blocking of the story was very consequential to the election and to our country. It very well may have led to the last 4 years of corruption, massive spending, inflation and world chaos because it very may well have saved Biden.

I would also argue, as would most Americans, that the correspondence found on the laptop gave an appearance of impropriety. The "big guy" was very likely Biden. It also shed a brighter light on Hunter's dealings in Ukraine and with Burisma. Most reasonable people, excluding MSNBC watchers, are now able to admit that Hunter, the crack head, didn't just happen to get that job. That is a monumental stretch. It is a very small stretch to believe that his dad was involved in some way.
But there wasn’t any evidence of impropriety. Even with the “big guy” email, that took place after he left office, a detail few followers or conservative media are allowed to know.

And it’s not like the story was actually censored. Any social media site that blocked it changed their position very quickly, well before the election.

The laptop story was part of crafting a false narrative.
 
There was plenty of pressure to take down COVID misinformation since, you know, that leads to people dying.

No one said anything about the laptop story which was super shady from the get go.

LOL!

Your party's lies killed 700,000 Americans.

1741713963349.webp
 
And it’s not like the story was actually censored. Any social media site that blocked it changed their position very quickly, well before the election.

Incorrect, which is why so many people weren't aware of the story until AFTER the election.

The laptop story was part of crafting a false narrative.

Again, sensible people aren't naive enough to think that Hunter, the crackhead, got a job paying VERY well in Ukraine when his dad was special envoy to that country. Clearly, Burisma wanted was trying to protect themselves. What do you know, it worked out well for them. It was all smoke and mirrors and Hunter was able to keep his crack supply stocked. Even if daddy didn't get money in return, his son benefitted handsomely from his influence. You know this. Everybody knows this(deep down). Many just can't bring themselves to admit it. I don't really care if they don't. Ignorance is bliss so they say and thank goodness that corrupt, morally bankrupt family is out of our federal government.
 
Incorrect, which is why so many people weren't aware of the story until AFTER the election.
Most people miss a lot of stories because they don’t pay attention to papers like the NY Post. The fact remains that it was blocked on Twitter for, like, 2 days. It’s pretty outlandish to say that swayed the election.
Again, sensible people aren't naive enough to think that Hunter, the crackhead, got a job paying VERY well in Ukraine when his dad was special envoy to that country. Clearly, Burisma wanted was trying to protect themselves. What do you know, it worked out well for them. It was all smoke and mirrors and Hunter was able to keep his crack supply stocked. Even if daddy didn't get money in return, his son benefitted handsomely from his influence. You know this. Everybody knows this(deep down). Many just can't bring themselves to admit it. I don't really care if they don't. Ignorance is bliss so they say and thank goodness that corrupt, morally bankrupt family is out of our federal government.
I have no doubt Hunter Biden got the job because Joe Biden was vice president, but there’s never been any evidence of bribery. The last time you guys thought you had evidence of that, it turned out to be total lies.

 
15th post
Good!

Strip all these Obama/Biden hacks of their security clearances.


Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announces she has STRIPPED the security clearances of:
    • Antony Blinken
    • Jake Sullivan
    • Lisa Monaco
    • Mark Zaid
    • Norman Eisen
    • Letitia James
    • Alvin Bragg
    • Andrew Weissman
    • 51 signers of the Hunter Biden "disinformation" letter






If true, this begs the question: Why would Leticia James (and some others) need a federal security clearance?
 
Most people miss a lot of stories because they don’t pay attention to papers like the NY Post. The fact remains that it was blocked on Twitter for, like, 2 days. It’s pretty outlandish to say that swayed the election.

"The New York Post chose not to delete its original tweets, so Twitter made an exception after two weeks to retroactively apply the new policy to the Post's tweets," Gadde said. "In hindsight, Twitter should have reinstated the Post account immediately."

I have no doubt Hunter Biden got the job because Joe Biden was vice president, but there’s never been any evidence of bribery. The last time you guys thought you had evidence of that, it turned out to be total lies.

Put on that thinking cap again. Do you think they paid Hunter for nothing? What did they get out of it? If nothing, why pay him so much money? It doesn't make a lot of sense now does it?

What you don't seem to get is that Burisma wanted Shokin fired. He was, and viola, Burisma was hit with a slap on the wrist and investigations were rather quickly concluded. That was their goal all along and why they paid Hunter. Yeah, yeah, we all know that others were on board with getting Shokin fired. They fell for it as well. You guys are so gullible it is scary.
 
"The New York Post chose not to delete its original tweets, so Twitter made an exception after two weeks to retroactively apply the new policy to the Post's tweets," Gadde said. "In hindsight, Twitter should have reinstated the Post account immediately."
Links to the story were allowed after 24 hours. The NY Post dug in for political points.
Put on that thinking cap again. Do you think they paid Hunter for nothing? What did they get out of it? If nothing, why pay him so much money? It doesn't make a lot of sense now does it?

What you don't seem to get is that Burisma wanted Shokin fired. He was, and viola, Burisma was hit with a slap on the wrist and investigations were rather quickly concluded. That was their goal all along and why they paid Hunter. Yeah, yeah, we all know that others were on board with getting Shokin fired. They fell for it as well. You guys are so gullible it is scary.
They paid Hunter Biden for his name. Shokin wasn’t the good guy. He was corrupt, running a corrupt department. I’ve never seen anything showing Burisma wanted him fired, and if they did, it was most likely because he was shaking them down for bribes, which is how his office operated. There was no Burisma investigation. It existed on paper, at most.
 
Put on that thinking cap again. Do you think they paid Hunter for nothing? What did they get out of it?
What about a board of directors that has the son of a former VP on it. Would make it easier to do business abroad wouldn't it? That should be worth a couple of thousands.
 
Back
Top Bottom