🚨Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard announces she has STRIPPED the security clearances of:

[Thinker101]

Yes! It does!

Great, when does the FBI raid Biden's house?

 

[DonGlock26]

In. The. Letter.

You are not able to show us. Got it.

 

[Marener]

Great, when does the FBI raid Biden's house?

They didn’t have to! Biden allowed a consensual search of his property.

Trump didn’t.

 

[Marener]

You are not able to show us. Got it.

I accept this as an admission you never read the letter. It’s actually pretty short. 5th paragraph specifically.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

 

[Thinker101]

They didn’t have to! Biden allowed a consensual search of his property.

Trump didn’t.

Consensual search? He sent lawyers to search, people that didn't have any security clearance.

 

[Marener]

Consensual search? He sent lawyers to search, people that didn't have any security clearance.

You’re wrong. Very poorly informed.

https://www.npr.org/2023/01/21/1150617734/the-doj-searched-bidens-home-and-found-more-classified-documents

 

[DonGlock26]

I accept this as an admission you never read the letter. It’s actually pretty short. 5th paragraph specifically.

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

I've read it. I'm asking for you to show us where they speak of "opinions" and "factual proof".

 

[Marener]

I've read it. I'm asking for you to show us where they speak of "opinions" and "factual proof".

5th. Paragraph.

 

[Hellokitty]

How is it possible for an opinion to be a lie? It can be wrong, and they were wrong, but that’s not a lie.

The whole Hunter laptop being Russian disinformation was started by the Biden campaign in-order to give Biden a deflection in the debates. And while you are trying to peddle it as an understood opinion, plenty of liberals on this site held to it as a fact, same with the MSM.

Either way none of these people are entitled to a security clearance. Gabbard was the one who before the election was questioning if these types of "opinions" could be considered in-kind campaign contributions and these people could face the same charges as Roger Stone.

 

[DonGlock26]

5th. Paragraph.

I see no mention of "opinions" or "factual proof". In fact, they go on later to quote several media articles to strengthen their claims of suspicions.

 

[Marener]

I see no mention of "opinions" or "factual proof". In fact, they go on later to quote several media articles to strengthen their suspicions.

Suspicions are opinions, silly. Are you struggling with reading comprehension?

 

[DonGlock26]

Suspicions are opinions, silly. Are you struggling with reading comprehension?

They never mention "opinions". They rather used the word suspicions to make their lies seem more credible than mere opinon.

They also do not mention "factual proof". In fact, they go on to cite media articles to strengthen the illusion they were trying to conjure.

 

[Marener]

They never mention "opinions". They rather used the word suspicions to make their lies seem more credible than mere opinon.

They also do not mention "factual proof". In fact, they go on to cite media articles to strengthen the illusion they were trying to conjure.

yes. This is the part that requires reading comprehension beyond, oh, maybe a 5th grade level.

 

[DonGlock26]

yes. This is the part that requires reading comprehension beyond, oh, maybe a 5th grade level.

Then there is the matter that this letter was started by the Biden admin.


"The 51 former intelligence officials’ Hunter Biden statement was a blatant political
operation from the start. It originated with a call from top Biden campaign official—and now
Secretary of State—Antony Blinken to former Deputy Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Director Michael Morell. The Committees’ investigation revealed that without this outreach from
Blinken, Morell would not have written the statement.4
Indeed, Morell told the Committees that
the Blinken phone call “triggered” his intent to write the statement.5 The statement’s drafters
were open about the goal of the project: “[W]e think Trump will attack Biden on the issue at this
week’s debate”6
and “we want to give the [Vice President] a talking point to use in response.”7"

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/the_intelligence_community_51-_how_cia_contractors_colluded_with_the_biden_campaign_to_mislead_american_voters.pdf

 

[BluesLegend]

The whole Hunter laptop being Russian disinformation was started by the Biden campaign in-order to give Biden a deflection in the debates. And while you are trying to peddle it as an understood opinion, plenty of liberals on this site held to it as a fact, same with the MSM.

Either way none of these people are entitled to a security clearance. Gabbard was the one who before the election was questioning if these types of "opinions" could be considered in-kind campaign contributions and these people could face the same charges as Roger Stone.

It was Biden and Democrats election RIGGING pure and simple the lying filth.

 

[jknowgood]

Jesus. Trump just wants to use government to hurt people who have opinions he doesn’t like.

Can you look at yourself in the mirror and say thst?

 

[Marener]

Can you look at yourself in the mirror and say thst?

Of course. I don’t live in your fantasy world. So it’s pretty straight forward.

 

[jknowgood]

Of course. I don’t live in your fantasy world. So it’s pretty straight forward.

Ok, get ready to regret it.

 

[Billiejeens]

Assume yes, and?

And you lose.

 

[Billiejeens]

They were former officials. They don’t use their government positions.

They do
MSNBC pays for that.