That I can agree with. And wish that history revisionist would say that, rather than once again preach the anti-American propagandaIt may well be true. The victory is a common victory of the Allied forces.And there you go, again only mentioning American supply efforts while ignoring American military contribution.It is pointless to diminish a great role of American supplies in WWII. But also, it is pointless to dismiss that it was the Soviet Union that bore the main burden of the battles. The Eastern front, it was where the spine of Nazis was broken militarily.There is no doubt that without the Soviet troops there wouldn't have been a victory over Nazi Germany and there wouldn't be Polish nation now. But, on the other hand, the USSR came as occupation force, not liberation.
Equally the war would have been over before it started if not for U.S. supply chain, and U.S. forces.
Just more leftist history revisionist distorting the facts to marginalize U.S. contribution while exaggerating Russian contribution.
And the snowflake self hating sheep eat it up willingly.
At no time would I diminish Russian efforts, but if Russia would have offensively fought Germany alone they would have loss, badly. Indeed Russia was held at bay by Polands much smaller army prior to WW II. The Russian army was very poorly outfitted, under supplied and many-many died of exposure and hardship than a bullet.