Pluto's has 4 Moons

[CrusaderFrank]

What IS the "more likely alternative?", Cru?

More likely that it's hollow and artificial

What is the evidence for it being hollow? You're aware that there isn't a substance dense enough to allow the orbital pattern it follows if it's not solid correct? Mass can be measured by distance, trajectory, and size.

The evidence includes seismomoter readings that indicate that the Moon resonates like a hollow body when struck. It's not totally hollow, is does seems to have a core and anomalous gravitation hot spots. But it is almost certainly not a solid object.

The only thing standing in the way of ability to accept the evidence that the Moon may be hollow is the Church like dogma that "a natural object cannot be hollow". And I agree. The Moon may not be a "Natural" object.

It's the same apparent size as the Sun, the only Moon in the Solar system with that feature on the only planet with self aware (I won't say intelligent) creatures on it

 

[L.K.Eder]

Mini EZ has this TShirt:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsVYpnYfRbg]‪Poor Pluto‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

everyone knows that the european socialist elitists marxo-weenies demoted pluto because the discoverer was an american.

 

[Truthseeker420]

So is it back to being a planet now?

 

[Truthmatters]

A body doesnt have to be a planet to have a moon

 

[Truthmatters]

Hollow Moon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The Hollow Moon theory is a pseudoscientific hypothesis proposing that Earth's Moon is either wholly hollow or otherwise contains a substantial interior space. No scientific evidence exists to support the idea.

The concept is related to or derived from the better-known Hollow Earth theory, and was an infrequent but recurring plot device in pre-spaceflight science fiction.

 

[Two Thumbs]

I thought one of the reasons Pluto got dropped to dwarf planet was b/c it didn't 'clear the region around it.' It was part of the belt, with other rocks floating around it. But now it has 4 moons. So it seems it will be up graded. [assuming I recall correctly]

Sirus got upped from star to dwarf b/c it's large enough to be rounded, but has no moons. so this may be good for us Pluto is a planet bitches fans.

 

[L.K.Eder]

A body doesnt have to be a planet to have a moon

but it sure helps in acquiring one

 

[Two Thumbs]

A body doesnt have to be a planet to have a moon

but it sure helps in acquiring one

I'm fairly certain the region around one must be free of other bodies that are not moons.

idk, it all got very confusing.

 

[Truthmatters]

The moons may be captured but not stable.

On a death spiral into the surface.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The moons may be captured but not stable.

On a death spiral into the surface.

The moon is moving away from us.

 

[flacaltenn]

Our moon is actually an abandoned self-storage facility. It's filled with junky sofas, broken lawnmowers, used baby furniture, and the best collection of comic books in the entire galaxy..

That explains the mass descrepancy...

 

[Woyzeck]

But Earth's Moon, which was supposedly the end result of a Mars size planet crashing into Earth (don't laugh) is our one and only Moon. There is no orbiting debris, no other small moons as a result of this titanic impact (stop laughing, this is serious, this is the best explanation as to how Earth has a Moon as large as it does) just one really big Moon way too large to have been captured by our gravity, shows the same face to us all the time and just so happens to be the only Moon in the solar system the exact apparent size as the Sun.

It's obvious that the Moon is just leftover from the villain of The Fifth Element.

Seriously though, that's pretty cool that Pluto has four moons.

 

[asterism]

More likely that it's hollow and artificial

What is the evidence for it being hollow? You're aware that there isn't a substance dense enough to allow the orbital pattern it follows if it's not solid correct? Mass can be measured by distance, trajectory, and size.

The evidence includes seismomoter readings that indicate that the Moon resonates like a hollow body when struck. It's not totally hollow, is does seems to have a core and anomalous gravitation hot spots. But it is almost certainly not a solid object.

The only thing standing in the way of ability to accept the evidence that the Moon may be hollow is the Church like dogma that "a natural object cannot be hollow". And I agree. The Moon may not be a "Natural" object.

It's the same apparent size as the Sun, the only Moon in the Solar system with that feature on the only planet with self aware (I won't say intelligent) creatures on it

The new study provides the first confirmation of layering of the moon's core and suggests that the moon, like Earth, has a solid inner core surrounded by a molten outer core, researchers said. But the moon's interior also has another layer of partially melted material – a ring of magma – around its outer core, the study found.

Details of the Moon's Core Revealed by 30-year-old Data | Space.com

 

[theliq]

Your not only and interesting educated Guy but bloody funny with it,crikey that's unusual for most on here,keep it up.

I say Yes to Planet Pluto....stuff what others think.....theliq

I was never in favor of Pluto's demotion.

Just because it's small and way the fuck out there and takes a couple of hundred years to orbit the sun.

Sounds discriminatory.

And I don't give a shit what they say, Pluto will always be a planet in good standing to me.

We gave my Dad a Sweatshirt that said something like "Back in my day Pluto was a planet"

 

[editec]

The current theory is laughable because our ego won't accept the more likely alternative.

Consider that the current theory tries to make sense of the facts that the Moon is even there in the first place: it's way too big. When discussing the improbability of an Earth sized planet having a Moon sized object in orbit, Astrophysicts Irwin Shapiro told his class the best explanation was "the Moon is an observational error -- it does not exist"

It may not all be coincidence that us little shoe wearing monkeys have a satellite the same apparent size as the Sun orbiting Earth. What's the big deal if it's artificial?

What IS the "more likely alternative?", Cru?

More likely that it's hollow and artificial

You think?

This is a facinating theory that's new to me, Cru.

Any theories as to who made it, and why?

As to the theory that it is hollow, couldn't that theory be easily proven or disproven by determining the amount of gavitational force it exerts?

Obviously if it was hollow it wouldn't have much gravitas compared to if it is not hollow, right?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What is the evidence for it being hollow? You're aware that there isn't a substance dense enough to allow the orbital pattern it follows if it's not solid correct? Mass can be measured by distance, trajectory, and size.

The evidence includes seismomoter readings that indicate that the Moon resonates like a hollow body when struck. It's not totally hollow, is does seems to have a core and anomalous gravitation hot spots. But it is almost certainly not a solid object.

The only thing standing in the way of ability to accept the evidence that the Moon may be hollow is the Church like dogma that "a natural object cannot be hollow". And I agree. The Moon may not be a "Natural" object.

It's the same apparent size as the Sun, the only Moon in the Solar system with that feature on the only planet with self aware (I won't say intelligent) creatures on it

The new study provides the first confirmation of layering of the moon's core and suggests that the moon, like Earth, has a solid inner core surrounded by a molten outer core, researchers said. But the moon's interior also has another layer of partially melted material – a ring of magma – around its outer core, the study found.

Details of the Moon's Core Revealed by 30-year-old Data | Space.com

Thats a great article! Thank you!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What IS the "more likely alternative?", Cru?

More likely that it's hollow and artificial

You think?

This is a facinating theory that's new to me, Cru.

Any theories as to who made it, and why?

As to the theory that it is hollow, couldn't that theory be easily proven or disproven by determining the amount of gavitational force it exerts?

Obviously if it was hollow it wouldn't have much gravitas compared to if it is not hollow, right?

I'm just following the science.

There is no convincing explanation as to how an Earth sized planet can capture a Moon sized object in the first place, but there it is! Check it out yourself. All of the theories, capture, Giant Impact, etc have fatal flaws that mean each theory fails.

Second, when the Apollo 13 booster landed on it the seismometers reported that the Moon rang like a bell for over three hours.

Third, it does not have a uniform gravity, but has areas of concentrated mass below the surface

I don't think it's totally hollow, it has a core and internal structure.

It would have been fun to drop additional instruments on the Moon. Oh well.

 

[konradv]

There is no convincing explanation as to how an Earth sized planet can capture a Moon sized object in the first place, but there it is! Check it out yourself. All of the theories, capture, Giant Impact, etc have fatal flaws that mean each theory fails.

What's the "fatal flaw" of the Giant Impact theory? Merely saying so isn't good enough. Let's see a cite to some data.

 

[editec]

More likely that it's hollow and artificial

You think?

This is a facinating theory that's new to me, Cru.

Any theories as to who made it, and why?

As to the theory that it is hollow, couldn't that theory be easily proven or disproven by determining the amount of gavitational force it exerts?

Obviously if it was hollow it wouldn't have much gravitas compared to if it is not hollow, right?

I'm just following the science.

There is no convincing explanation as to how an Earth sized planet can capture a Moon sized object in the first place, but there it is! Check it out yourself. All of the theories, capture, Giant Impact, etc have fatal flaws that mean each theory fails.

Second, when the Apollo 13 booster landed on it the seismometers reported that the Moon rang like a bell for over three hours.

Third, it does not have a uniform gravity, but has areas of concentrated mass below the surface

I don't think it's totally hollow, it has a core and internal structure.

It would have been fun to drop additional instruments on the Moon. Oh well.

I see.

The theory is that it is not entirely hollow, but that it is still a artifical moon?

Okay, any theory as to who built it or why?