Please Fire Mueller!

[easyt65]

The reality of your argument is that you want only Trump supporters investigating him. Whoa.

Surprise, surprise - another false allegation.

No, dear, OL.

I would prefer an Independent Counsel led by someone TRULY neutral, who has no ties to a disgruntled, self-identified leaking fired ex-Director of the FBI who perjured himself under oath recently.

I would like a Counsel whose members are not Trump-Haters or Hillary lawyers.

Ever heard of being judged by one's peers. Is there even one Conservative on that Counsel - not there has to be - I would prefer they were all neutral)?

Seriously - YOU, TOO - have no problem with a Clinton Lawyer on the Counsel when it was Hillary who was defeated in this last election that is being investigated? REALLY? Hell, why not have Obama appointed as 'Special Advisor to the Counsel'....

 

[The Derp]

I would prefer an Independent Counsel led by someone TRULY neutral

Seems to me like you're trying to gaslight this whole thing so you don't have to accept the inevitable conclusions.

 

[easyt65]

I would prefer an Independent Counsel led by someone TRULY neutral

Seems to me like you're trying to gaslight this whole thing so you don't have to accept the inevitable conclusions.

It has already been 'lit' by the appointment of Trump-hating / pro-Hillary Dems and Clinton lawyers, investigating a non-crime based on the testimony of a disgruntled fired ex-FBI Director whose perjurous testimony included how he failed to do his job, violated FBI protocol and self-identified as a leaker.

Oh yeah, this is a completely up-and-up investigation.


'Inevitable collusion'....

That's funny coming from snowflakes who could not accept
- Hillary's defeat
- No evidence of criminal activity by Trump or his team
- No evidence of collusion by Trump
- Who now have been reduced to hoping Mueller will succeed where Comey failed based off comey's testimony of how Trump said 'I HOPE...'

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

For all the lib leftist morons thinking (once again) that THIS IS IT for Trump....I'm telling you RIGHT NOW.....NO IT IS NOT.

You salivating fools want to kill any opposition so bad that you have fooled yourselves into believing your own lies.
Trump WILL NOT be impeached and will serve out his 4 years and quite possibly 8.
The Left is pissing off the right and ALL reasonable Americans with all this insane and violent BS and proving what total assclowns and violent PsOS you are.

All this is going to backfire right in your faces just like the 2016 election did.

Trump has done NOTHING wrong....but Obama screwed America every chance he could. You people are literally sick.

 

[OldLady]

The reality of your argument is that you want only Trump supporters investigating him. Whoa.

Surprise, surprise - another false allegation.

No, dear, OL.

I would prefer an Independent Counsel led by someone TRULY neutral, who has no ties to a disgruntled, self-identified leaking fired ex-Director of the FBI who perjured himself under oath recently.

I would like a Counsel whose members are not Trump-Haters or Hillary lawyers.

Ever heard of being judged by one's peers. Is there even one Conservative on that Counsel - not there has to be - I would prefer they were all neutral)?

Seriously - YOU, TOO - have no problem with a Clinton Lawyer on the Counsel when it was Hillary who was defeated in this last election that is being investigated? REALLY? Hell, why not have Obama appointed as 'Special Advisor to the Counsel'....

Neutral? Sounds to me like if they voted for Hillary, you don't consider them fair minded enough to perform their duties. Did one of these attorneys actually represent Hillary? I don't know. I'm asking. But when there are two people running for President, people who take their responsibility as citizens to vote will choose one or the other. And what you are saying is that if they chose Hillary they can't do an investigation into Trump.
You know what I think? I think they will be fair. You know why? They are professionals. They are not like you.

 

[sealybobo]

When I read that Muelller is being funded by a lot of people on the left or that he has connections to them it made me realize that the republican party might have it out for Trump. I understand if the democratic party picked him but when republicans themselves don't raise any flags about a possible conflict of interest over this matter then it makes me wonder if they are complicit in this. There are a lot of republicans who a) don't like Trump b) wouldn't mind if he got caned from the job so it makes me wonder if the republican party themselves are allowing the democratic party to do the dirty work they couldn't do during the election.

I haven't been paying too much attention to this but what is so wrong with firing this Mueler guy other than it would make Trump look bad? It would make him look bad but that is just appearances and not substance. Maybe there is good reason to fire him and, if so, what are those reasons?

You guys are so guilty it's obvious. And paranoid. Scared what he's going to find?

Comey’s testimony was very bad news for Jeff Sessions

Comey said, “Our judgment, as I recall, was that he was very close to and inevitably going to recuse himself for a variety of reasons. We also were aware of facts that I can’t discuss in an open setting that would make his continued engagement in a Russia-related investigation problematic.”

So they know Sessions is guilty of something.

 

[easyt65]

Neutral? Sounds to me like if they voted for Hillary, you don't consider them fair minded enough to perform their duties."

High profile politically active Liberal Lawyers who voted for and were/are big donors. No, I do not consider them neutral.

Did one of these attorneys actually represent Hillary?

YES. One is a Clinton Foundation Lawyer.

You know what I think? I think they will be fair. You know why? They are professionals. They are not like you.

So calling into question obvious conflicts of interest is being 'Un-professional'? Gee, it's not like the Democrats who have been pushing these investigations, who have broken laws to undermine this newly elected administration has given us any reason to question their motivations or actions, right?

 

[toobfreak]

The goal is to find out the truth why so many of Trump's staff have Russian connections.
If it means removing the orange clown from office so be it..
All of his staff didn't go to Russia and meet with them in the USA without being directed by the prez himself.

No! We are talking about TRUMP! Not Hillary. Hillary is gone, dude!

 

[Reasonable]

Let me shorten that for the non readers.
Mueller should not and will not be fired because..
Mueller is widely seen as a nonpolitical, dogged investigator, respected on both sides of the aisle. The extension of his term passed the Senate 100-0, and he was also initially confirmed in 2001 unanimously, 98-0.

So when Mueller 100% exonerates Trump et al you're going to be fine with his results?
If Mueller recommends any charges be brought against President Trumpet al for any reason he better be ready to convince a Supreme Court. Because that is where the matter will be litigated and decided once and for all.
Mueller is just going through the motions.
After a few months of finding fuck all he'll tell his team to wrap it up and stop wasting taxpayer money on a fucking LIB wet dream dead horse.

Yes. Whatever Mueller concludes I'll be fine with it.
But it's inconceivable Orange was not personally involved with the Russians.
Why hasn't he condemned the Russians hacking our democracy?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did he pick Ross for Commerce Secretary when Ross was the head of the same bank Putin launders his dirty money?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Kushner use secret back channels to meet with Russians?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Sessions commit perjury when he said he didn't meet with Russians after saying he did?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump try to stop the Flynn investigation?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump implore Putin to hack the email of his political opponent?
That's extremely suspicious.
I have about 10 more but you get the point.
To think none of these suspicious circumstances will amount to anything defies reason.

If Hillary and headministration did all these nefarious things would you still be making excuses for her?
Trump has a long history of being dirty in the business world.
Do you really think at age 71 he's turned into an honest boyscout as president?

Everything I've said leads any reasonable person to conclude he's as guilty as hell along with his staff.

Mueller will find out the truth and it won't be pretty for you DEPLORABLES. Will you still defend him when it's concluded he committed treason?

 

[jc456]

Couldn't find collusion so he move onto something else

Why do you morons keep saying that? The investigations are at the beginning not the end.

thirteen months is not the beginning. wow.

 

[easyt65]

The goal is to find out the truth why so many of Trump's staff have Russian connections.
If it means removing the orange clown from office so be it..
All of his staff didn't go to Russia and meet with them in the USA without being directed by the prez himself.

No! We are talking about TRUMP! Not Hillary. Hillary is gone, dude!

Yes, if we WERE talking about Hillary, which snowflakes are rabidly adverse to doing, we would have to talk about:

The Clinton Foundation getting donations from a Russian businessman involved in the sale of US Uranium to Russia...or how exposed e-mails recovered from Abdein's laptop proves Influence Peddling...

Bubba giving speeches during the campaign for Putin Pals, Ex-KGB

Hillary's campaign manager getting un-reported thousands of Russian stocks and 1/3rd of his company's board members being prominent Russian businessmen with connections to the Kremlin and Putin

Or her Campaign manager's brother working for the KGB Bank and the Russian Spy agency that reportedly hacked the DNC E-mails....

Good thing we are talking about TRUMP and not Hillary...

 

[jc456]

Let me shorten that for the non readers.
Mueller should not and will not be fired because..
Mueller is widely seen as a nonpolitical, dogged investigator, respected on both sides of the aisle. The extension of his term passed the Senate 100-0, and he was also initially confirmed in 2001 unanimously, 98-0.

So when Mueller 100% exonerates Trump et al you're going to be fine with his results?
If Mueller recommends any charges be brought against President Trumpet al for any reason he better be ready to convince a Supreme Court. Because that is where the matter will be litigated and decided once and for all.
Mueller is just going through the motions.
After a few months of finding fuck all he'll tell his team to wrap it up and stop wasting taxpayer money on a fucking LIB wet dream dead horse.

Yes. Whatever Mueller concludes I'll be fine with it.
But it's inconceivable Orange was not personally involved with the Russians.
Why hasn't he condemned the Russians hacking our democracy?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did he pick Ross for Commerce Secretary when Ross was the head of the same bank Putin launders his dirty money?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Kushner use secret back channels to meet with Russians?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Sessions commit perjury when he said he didn't meet with Russians after saying he did?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump try to stop the Flynn investigation?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump implore Putin to hack the email of his political opponent?
That's extremely suspicious.
I have about 10 more but you get the point.
To think none of these suspicious circumstances will amount to anything defies reason.

If Hillary and hr administration did all these nefarious things would you still be making excuses for her?
Trump has a long history of being dirty in the business world.
Do you really think at age 71 he's turned into an honest boyscout as president?

Everything I've said leads any reasonable person to conclude he's as guilty as hell along with his staff.

Mueller will found out the truth and it won't be pretty for you DEPLORABLES. Will you still defend him when it's concluded he committed treason?

nice leftist libturd talking points. now prove them. let's see where your link is for trump and russia after comey said there wasn't even an investigation. see it is blatant lies such as these which spark the violence in the country. nice job douche bag. I see you do not denounce the shooting incident yesterday. nice.

 

[mudwhistle]

What has he done or said in his role as Special Counsel to warrant being fired?

"Robert Mueller is superb choice to be special counsel. His reputation is impeccable for honesty and integrity. Media should now calm down" -- Newt Gingrich, May 18th 2017

Well, we know how truthful and loyal Gingrich is. Just ask his wife (s).

Thank you for sharing the opinions of the myriad of voices that inhibit the void between your ears.

Meanwhile back on Earth, still waiting for someone to point out what Mueller has done or said to warrant being fired from his role as Special Counsel.

Several reasons:

• Close associations with Comey
• Comey's own testimony that his leaks were intended to cause the creation of Mueller's position
• Leaks to the press by Mueller that Trump is under investigation
• Leaks that Obstruction is their primary focus

Any questions???

Time to educate the speds.

Mueller was former FBI director James Comey's predecessor.

The longtime litigator was the second-longest FBI director in history, only behind iconic and controversial director J. Edgar Hoover. Congress passed legislation in 2011 to extend Mueller's term from the usual 10 years, giving him a 12-year tenure.

Mueller, 72, oversaw the FBI from September 4, 2001, just days before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, until September 4, 2013.

Mueller is widely seen as a nonpolitical, dogged investigator, respected on both sides of the aisle. The extension of his term passed the Senate 100-0, and he was also initially confirmed in 2001 unanimously, 98-0.

Since leaving the FBI, Mueller has not been a stranger to high-profile investigations.

In 2015, Mueller conducted an inquiry into the NFL's handling of a video of former running back Ray Rice punching his then-fiancée. And last year, Mueller was asked by Booz Allen Hamilton to conduct a security review after a contractor was arrested for allegedly stealing national security secrets.

Philip Mudd, a CNN contributor and former deputy director of the FBI's national security branch under Mueller, praised the appointment to CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Thursday.

"Every American who thinks that this is a moment of turmoil, whether they like the President or not, should breathe easy tonight: Robert Muller is solid ground," Mudd said.

"He is not one of the best, Robert Mueller, he is the best I ever saw. Leadership, judgment, decision-making," he added. "There is nobody better at doggedly pursuing a target without being subjected to any pressures from Congress, the President, the media, anybody in the FBI, the attorney general, the deputy attorney general. There is nobody better."

Atop the FBI, Mueller saw the bureau through a time of tremendous change in a post-9/11 world. His tenure saw the rise of al Qaeda as a threat, the vast expansion of US surveillance capabilities and an increase in the threat from home-grown terrorism. Mueller reflected on the changes in an exit interviewwith CNN in 2013, saying the intelligence collection capabilities the US built since 9/11 could possibly have stopped part of the attacks.

They said the same crap about Comey too, and look how fucked up he turned out to be.

 

[toobfreak]

You're scared to death of Mueller because he's so good at what he does.

I won't let you forget you said that.

Rod Rosenstein is the only one that can fire Mueller and he's already on record saying he has no cause or desire to do that.

Dude, that is so wrong. Trump is Top Dog and can fire God if he wants to. He is bigger than Apple Pie. He can have THREE scoops of ice-cream if he wants and the rest none. And he has changed his mind before. <heh heh>

I bet that is a Cuban cigar, too. Didn't he just give the shaft to the Cubans? Screw the people and smoke their cigars! Maybe he will buy the island and turn it into a golfing resort for him and all the people far richer than you.

 

[mudwhistle]

Let me shorten that for the non readers.
Mueller should not and will not be fired because..
Mueller is widely seen as a nonpolitical, dogged investigator, respected on both sides of the aisle. The extension of his term passed the Senate 100-0, and he was also initially confirmed in 2001 unanimously, 98-0.

And you are nothing but a political hack who wouldn't admit to the truth even if it kicked you in the nuts.

 

[mudwhistle]

So what you're saying is Trump has no right to do his job.

Not if he got the job by colluding with Russia.

And continues to take foreign money in violation of the emoluments clause of the constitution.

Yeah......so.....there...

 

[easyt65]

Let me shorten that for the non readers.
Mueller should not and will not be fired because..
Mueller is widely seen as a nonpolitical, dogged investigator, respected on both sides of the aisle. The extension of his term passed the Senate 100-0, and he was also initially confirmed in 2001 unanimously, 98-0.

So when Mueller 100% exonerates Trump et al you're going to be fine with his results?
If Mueller recommends any charges be brought against President Trumpet al for any reason he better be ready to convince a Supreme Court. Because that is where the matter will be litigated and decided once and for all.
Mueller is just going through the motions.
After a few months of finding fuck all he'll tell his team to wrap it up and stop wasting taxpayer money on a fucking LIB wet dream dead horse.

Yes. Whatever Mueller concludes I'll be fine with it.
But it's inconceivable Orange was not personally involved with the Russians.
Why hasn't he condemned the Russians hacking our democracy?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did he pick Ross for Commerce Secretary when Ross was the head of the same bank Putin launders his dirty money?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Kushner use secret back channels to meet with Russians?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Sessions commit perjury when he said he didn't meet with Russians after saying he did?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump try to stop the Flynn investigation?
That's extremely suspicious.
Why did Trump implore Putin to hack the email of his political opponent?
That's extremely suspicious.
I have about 10 more but you get the point.

Let's cut through the crap (as many of these have been answered) and sum it al up, address it all at one time, by asking the snowflakes to provide something they have not been able to do yet - provide any solid, undeniable evidence of criminal activity on anything - on any of their accusations to date.

Bottom line, there is none. There is no smoking gun. There is no gun. There is no victim (except for Hillary being beaten). THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.

If there were any, Trump would have already been indicted, there would be no need for a Special Counsel to keep digging, and snowflakes would not be praying Mueller can pull off something where Comey failed.

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm not being partisan when I say this, but what was revealed about Comey, Mueller, and the 3 Clinton donors Mueller placed on his staff, seriously calls in to question the impartiality of this.

And after Comey's testimony, it should be a slam dunk, that there was No Russian Collusion, and No Obstruction, and they need to investigate other things, such as Comey's actions, Rice, Lynch etc.

So only people who voted for Trump are acceptable to investigate him?

He's been investigated and has been cleared by Comey.
Now you want another one by somebody else cuz you didn't get the desired result.

 

[toobfreak]

Please fire him. I'm resigned to 3.5 years of the Orange Buffoon, but if it can be less I'll be thankful

There is always carbon monoxide. Here, let me start the car for you.

 

[The Derp]

It has already been 'lit' by the appointment of Trump-hating / pro-Hillary Dems and Clinton lawyers, investigating a non-crime based on the testimony of a disgruntled fired ex-FBI Director who testified how he failed to do his job, violated FBI protocol and self-identified as a leaker.

Weird you say that because just a couple months ago, Trump and all you Conservatives were singing Mueller's praises.