It's the law where I come from.
The law where you come from is if you see a grouping of dogs it's your duty to shoot them? Can you site the ordinance?
Cite, idiot. It's common where you have open range.
It is cite, It's a phonetic typo, they are quite common. Other than that. It's the law to shoot dogs running around together? Like I said,
cite the ordinance.
I gave you the link. Meanwhile, the aspca says breed bans are useless.
Breed Specific Legislation
Totally agree, you're study doesn't break out dog breeds and demonstrates nothing. In the meantime, how many
This study is asking dog owners to rate their dogs. How many were Pit Bulls?
To continue with this. Do you have a study about dog attacks? Not whether the family pet barks at strangers. Everybody thinks they have the best dog in the world, the study is naturally biased. What I would like to see is a break out of breeds, can you show me?
The CDC keeps numbers but they provide the disclaimer that the breed tally is not accurate because in very few reports is the breed verified...they get the stats from news articles, and reporters just guess or go with what random ppl tell them.
That is true to the extent that the CDC didn't ask anyone to confirm what a Pit Bull is. So, you'll more than likely post something with a tic-tac-doe board of manipulation "demonstrating" that people can't identify what a Pit Bull is.
In the meantime, the CDC report at least speaks to bread and the numbers are not good for Pit Bulls.
What you should do is look for are dog attack fatalities and see who the biggest culprit is. Then try to figure out how many of those dogs got away that couldn't be identified.