Pirro has 0% success rate as US Attorney for DC

Yours is based on cult propaganda.
Washington, D.C. is one of the most corrupt cities in the country. The Democrats completely control it. They get exactly what they want, every time.
 
Washington, D.C. is one of the most corrupt cities in the country. The Democrats completely control it. They get exactly what they want, every time.
If they got what they want, trump would eat shit and die.
 
Pirro seems to have received her position because of her obnoxious and confrontational support of trump on fox. He didn't consider the fact that she was just another loud mouthed incompetent supporter. Her latest failure was when she tried to make a federal case over a homeless guy with a cat toy. She wanted to lock the poor guy up for a long time because somebody said he pointed his cat toy at a low flying helicopter. Nobody on the helicopter reported any such thing. The jury acquitted him in 30 minutes. Pirro has repeatedly shown she is incompetent at her job, and her 0% success rate as US attorney for DC proves it'


Jeanine Pirro: Documented Case Outcomes as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia​

This page summarizes all publicly documented prosecutorial outcomes during Jeanine Pirro’s current role as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Only cases reported in publicly accessible sources are included.

Felony Indictment Attempts​

  • 0 wins
  • 7 failures
    • Three failed felony indictment attempts in the Sydney Reid case
    • One failed felony indictment attempt in the Nathalie Rose Jones case
    • Three failed felony indictment attempts in a separate FBI‑agent assault case

Misdemeanor Trials​

  • 0 wins
  • 1 loss
    • Lost misdemeanor trial following failed felony indictments in the Reid case

Felony Case Dismissals​

  • 0 wins
  • 13 dismissals
    • Eleven felony assault‑on‑officer cases dismissed in a single month
    • Additional dismissals including Donisha Butler and Terrance Wilson

Combined Documented Outcomes​

CategoryWinsLosses
Felony indictment attempts07
Misdemeanor trials01
Felony dismissals013
Total documented outcomes021

Documented Win Percentage​

[ ext{Win rate} = rac{0}{21} = 0% ]
This reflects only the outcomes publicly documented during her current tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Documentation and Sources​

rac{0}{21} = 0% ]
This reflects only the outcomes publicly documented during her current tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Documentation and Sources​

These links provide publicly accessible documentation supporting the case outcomes summarized above.
It was not Pirro at all.

A complaint filed on Sept. 22, 2025, alleged that Winker pointed the laser at a Secret Service officer assigned to secure the flight path for Marine One on the day of the incident. Winker was accused of then pointing the device at the presidential helicopter as it was flying overhead, the document continues.

At the time of the alleged incident, Marine One was taking off from the south grounds of the White House, with Trump aboard, according to the complaint. The Secret Service officer said in the document that he initially noticed a shirtless Winker "talking to himself and being loud." The officer detained Winker following the alleged incident as his actions were a "danger to Marine One and everyone on-board," the complaint reads.

"[Winker's] conduct posed a risk of flash blindness and pilot disorientation, especially during low-level flight near other helicopters [U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marine Corps] and the Washington Monument," the complaint continues. "This placed Marine One at risk of an airborne collision."

After being handcuffed, Winker dropped to his knees and "began saying things like, 'I should apologize to Donald Trump,' and 'I apologize to Donald Trump,'” according to the complaint.

He "repeated this action several times," the document reads.


Alexis Gardner and Ubong Akpan, the public defenders representing Winker in the case, told USA TODAY in a statement on Jan. 17 that the jury deliberated for just 35 minutes before finding their client not guilty.

Gardner and Akpan said the jury's verdict "underscores what should have been obvious from the start: Mr. Winkler committed no crime, and this prosecution was an unjust exercise of power."

Again, even the defense never blamed Pirro.
 
It was not Pirro at all.

A complaint filed on Sept. 22, 2025, alleged that Winker pointed the laser at a Secret Service officer assigned to secure the flight path for Marine One on the day of the incident. Winker was accused of then pointing the device at the presidential helicopter as it was flying overhead, the document continues.

At the time of the alleged incident, Marine One was taking off from the south grounds of the White House, with Trump aboard, according to the complaint. The Secret Service officer said in the document that he initially noticed a shirtless Winker "talking to himself and being loud." The officer detained Winker following the alleged incident as his actions were a "danger to Marine One and everyone on-board," the complaint reads.

"[Winker's] conduct posed a risk of flash blindness and pilot disorientation, especially during low-level flight near other helicopters [U.S. Park Police, U.S. Marine Corps] and the Washington Monument," the complaint continues. "This placed Marine One at risk of an airborne collision."

After being handcuffed, Winker dropped to his knees and "began saying things like, 'I should apologize to Donald Trump,' and 'I apologize to Donald Trump,'” according to the complaint.

He "repeated this action several times," the document reads.


Alexis Gardner and Ubong Akpan, the public defenders representing Winker in the case, told USA TODAY in a statement on Jan. 17 that the jury deliberated for just 35 minutes before finding their client not guilty.

Gardner and Akpan said the jury's verdict "underscores what should have been obvious from the start: Mr. Winkler committed no crime, and this prosecution was an unjust exercise of power."

Again, even the defense never blamed Pirro.
It was Pirro's call to prosecute the case. She failed again.
 
15th post
Pirro is the US attorney for DC. dumb ass. She decides which federal cases to prosecute.
She does not, staff handles this.
1768779021638.webp
 
Pirro seems to have received her position because of her obnoxious and confrontational support of trump on fox. He didn't consider the fact that she was just another loud mouthed incompetent supporter. Her latest failure was when she tried to make a federal case over a homeless guy with a cat toy. She wanted to lock the poor guy up for a long time because somebody said he pointed his cat toy at a low flying helicopter. Nobody on the helicopter reported any such thing. The jury acquitted him in 30 minutes. Pirro has repeatedly shown she is incompetent at her job, and her 0% success rate as US attorney for DC proves it'


Jeanine Pirro: Documented Case Outcomes as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia​

This page summarizes all publicly documented prosecutorial outcomes during Jeanine Pirro’s current role as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Only cases reported in publicly accessible sources are included.

Felony Indictment Attempts​

  • 0 wins
  • 7 failures
    • Three failed felony indictment attempts in the Sydney Reid case
    • One failed felony indictment attempt in the Nathalie Rose Jones case
    • Three failed felony indictment attempts in a separate FBI‑agent assault case

Misdemeanor Trials​

  • 0 wins
  • 1 loss
    • Lost misdemeanor trial following failed felony indictments in the Reid case

Felony Case Dismissals​

  • 0 wins
  • 13 dismissals
    • Eleven felony assault‑on‑officer cases dismissed in a single month
    • Additional dismissals including Donisha Butler and Terrance Wilson

Combined Documented Outcomes​

CategoryWinsLosses
Felony indictment attempts07
Misdemeanor trials01
Felony dismissals013
Total documented outcomes021

Documented Win Percentage​

[ ext{Win rate} = rac{0}{21} = 0% ]
This reflects only the outcomes publicly documented during her current tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Documentation and Sources​

rac{0}{21} = 0% ]
This reflects only the outcomes publicly documented during her current tenure as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia.

Documentation and Sources​

These links provide publicly accessible documentation supporting the case outcomes summarized above.
I didn't read the article because I really don't care about these frivolous distractions. I do, however, completely agree that Pirro is extremely obnoxious. She's perfectly fine when she isn't scratching a chalkboard -- oops -- I mean speaking.
 
Back
Top Bottom