ah, ok, so it wasnt like you were trying to just report on the story(R-handjob) = Republican handjob....... but I'm willing to bet there is a town called Handjob in Texas.
i'll make note not to ever take you serious
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
ah, ok, so it wasnt like you were trying to just report on the story(R-handjob) = Republican handjob....... but I'm willing to bet there is a town called Handjob in Texas.
no, not always, but then i dont choose to editorialize in the middle of a news reportyes....I can see that you are a very serious dude.
no, not always, but then i dont choose to editorialize in the middle of a news reportyes....I can see that you are a very serious dude.
kerry on dude
Texas's mandatory Bible Class
Link
Excerpt:
As of this school year, all Texas public schools will be required to offer a course on the Bible. Apparently, there are quite a few politicians and school board members in Texas who are either
1) unaware of the existence of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or
2) actively trying to subvert it.
Nonsense, said William Mattox Jr.(R-Handjob). You cant effectively explore American history, or even pop culture, without knowing the stories, themes, and words of the Bible. Kudos to the Texas Board of Education for not skirting
this contentious fight. As long as the teachers avoid engaging in religious indoctrination, these classes should benefit everyone.
Thats one of the problems with the law, said Jeremy Burchard in The UT Daily Texan. Teachers havent been trained to teach such an explosive topic, and Texas didnt provide funding to instruct them. That means biblical literacy classes will devolve into legally questionable, polarizing free-for-allsand dozens of inevitable lawsuits will follow.
Why does Texas wage a constant war on science, logic and common sense?
Let's cut to the chase.
ID does not belong in a science room. It belongs in a humanties, religion, or philosopy class.
Yes, let's cut to the chase.
Same for evolution.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Yes, let's cut to the chase.
Same for evolution.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
You know you can't, kitten, so take the nonsense elsewhere. For a Christian to bear false witness is a sin.
Yes, let's cut to the chase.
Same for evolution.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
You can't name one respected biologist that would agree with you. Not one.
and whoever you might name they would discountActually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
You can't name one respected biologist that would agree with you. Not one.
Ah, goal post-moving. One of the classic signs of a debater in deep shit.
Some reasons why scientists adopt liberal politicial views:
In short, most of them tend to fit perfectly into the liberal powerbroker establishment.
- They believe that all problems are fixable with the right data, research effort and funding.
- Only massive public funding, without "strings" -- like performance standards -- will provide the right answers .... in time. Any money spent on higher education is well spent no matter the quality of the returns.
- Average people have nothing to offer in life experience, publications in journals or wisdom that gives them a place at the table when the big issues are being resolved.
- Being out of touch massively with developments outside their narrow field of expertise causes them no qualms in prescribing nostrums for the rest of us.
and whoever you might name they would discountYou can't name one respected biologist that would agree with you. Not one.
Ah, goal post-moving. One of the classic signs of a debater in deep shit.
works perfect for dishonest assholes like him
and whoever you might name they would discountAh, goal post-moving. One of the classic signs of a debater in deep shit.
works perfect for dishonest assholes like him
Exactly. "We only respect people who agree with us, therefore you can't name anyone respected who disagrees with us, therefore we are correct because everyone respected agrees with us, because if they didn't, we wouldn't respect them."
It's circular thinking, insofar as you can consider it thinking at all.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
You know you can't, kitten, so take the nonsense elsewhere. For a Christian to bear false witness is a sin.
Actually, I can, puppy, and I notice that your approach is to tell me to shut up and try to dismiss me, not to challenge me and debate me. What're you afraid of? Is it my religion or the fact that I'm a woman that's got you running like a scalded bitch? Which one has you scared that your dick is going to shrink even further?
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
You know you can't, kitten, so take the nonsense elsewhere. For a Christian to bear false witness is a sin.
Actually, I can, puppy, and I notice that your approach is to tell me to shut up and try to dismiss me, not to challenge me and debate me. What're you afraid of? Is it my religion or the fact that I'm a woman that's got you running like a scalded bitch? Which one has you scared that your dick is going to shrink even further?
Yes, let's cut to the chase.
Same for evolution.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
The overwhelming majority of biologists would disagree with you, so your opinion is worthless. But I do agree that ID and evolution should both be include in a class on Epistemology.
Actually, I can name many biologists who would AGREE with me, so all you're really saying is that you consider my opinion worthless because YOU disagree. Sorry, but THAT is worthless.
I think you either give kids all the info, or at least stop trying to pretend we know things we don't until some concrete evidence turns up.
The problem with intelligent design or creationism or whatever is not whether or not they are true. That can never be proven.
The problem is that they rely on the existence of a supernatural power. In doing so, they automatically remove themselves from the scientfic method, which makes no provisions for entities outside of the natural world.
If these things are to be taught, they can't be taught in the science classroom, as they aren't science. I suppose you could squeeze them into a philosophy class.
That was the finding of the court in Dover as well.
Texas's mandatory Bible Class
Link
Excerpt:
As of this school year, all Texas public schools will be required to offer a course on the Bible. “Apparently, there are quite a few politicians and school board members in Texas who are either
1) unaware of the existence of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, or
2) actively trying to subvert it.”
Nonsense, said William Mattox Jr.(R-Handjob). “You can’t effectively explore American history, or even pop culture, without knowing the stories, themes, and words of the Bible. Kudos to the Texas Board of Education for not skirting
this “contentious fight.” As long as the teachers avoid “engaging in religious indoctrination,” these classes should benefit everyone.
That’s one of the problems with the law, said Jeremy Burchard in The UT Daily Texan. Teachers haven’t been trained to teach “such an explosive topic,” and Texas didn’t provide funding to instruct them. That means biblical literacy classes will “devolve” into legally questionable, polarizing free-for-alls—and “dozens of inevitable lawsuits” will follow.
Why does Texas wage a constant war on science, logic and common sense?
Every state university in the country, and most of the others, teaches classes in the Bible as literature, for precisely the purpose of acquainting students with its stories, themes, and words so that they can understand it as background to Western culture. Are you suggesting that our universities are unscientific, illogical, and lacking common sense for doing so?