Pete Hegseth lashes out at 'kill them all' report on boat strikes

[Nostra]

International laws (which we are signatories on) do indeed.

 

[Lesh]

View attachment 1189467

Ya hadda say something I guess

 

[Delldude]

Which of the drug smugglers was supporting AlQaeda?

Not required.

'The Marener always rings twice'

 

[Nostra]

Looks like a bass boat to me.....

 

[Mac-7]

You are resurecting the old concept of a trial. America gas moved on from that especiallly for hispanics.

Illegal aliens get a review by an immigration officer not a trial by judge and jury before deportation

 

[Mack The Finger]

Kids, this is your brain on 24/7 partisan politics.

Sad.

YO...HomieA...what do you think about when ObamaChrist executed that Muslim-American and his 16 year old son ?

He said him reviewing the case file was due process...our President made me proud that day.

What did he deny that your whole thread was based on? It wasnt in your link. It would be telling if he did not deny the specifics. I didnt see him deny the specifics. Hmm.

I don't know WTF you're talking about...your post got lost in the flood.

Dude...2nd hand info wouldn't hold up in court but the satanic MSM will quote even knowing that.

Whatever your smoking...I suggest you put it down and step back.

It has been reported by someone close to the source citygator admitted MTF was right.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Looks like a bass boat to me.....

That is one of those new fishing boats with the invisible fishing rods.

It has been reported you can increase your catch by double with it.

 

[Lesh]

YO...HomieA...what do you think about when ObamaChrist executed that Muslim-American and his 16 year old son ?

He said him reviewing the case file was due process...our President made me proud that day.



I don't know WTF you're talking about...your post got lost in the flood.

Dude...2nd hand info wouldn't hold up in court but the satanic MSM will quote even knowing that.

Whatever your smoking...I suggest you put it down and step back.

It has been reported by someone close to the source citygator admitted MTF was right.

Did you also take issue with the killing of Osama?

Why not?

 

[Delldude]

Did you also take issue with the killing of Osama?

Why not?

Osama an American?

 

[Mack The Finger]

Did you also take issue with the killing of Osama?

Why not?

I never really gave it much thought but you'll have to agree he got what his hand called for.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yes there actually is

You're lying, as you always do, and you know it.

 

[Nostra]

Osama an American?

I don't think so, but Lurch is clearly still butthurt over it.

 

[Roshambo]

O NOS!

Now the Cult has RUMERS.

Ohs yes

 

[Nostra]

Ohs yes

Good luck with that.

 

[Zavulon]

It was a boat of declared terrorist organization.

It was an unarmed, civilian boat. There is no mention in the UNCLOS a word about "terroristic organisations", and there was no decision of UN SC about equality of Venezuela's cocaine clippers and terrorists. And military ships, according UNCLOS, has no right to attack unarmed civilian ships except only three cases: piracy, slave-trading, misusage of flag.
If we add permission to attack unarmed terrorists' ships in high seas, Russia will attack yachts of several American billionaires who sponsored FBK (declared as terrorist organisation in Russia, but legal in the USA), or, say, Muslim-brothers.

 

[forkup]

The boat was afloat and on fire, and thus, was crippled/disabled by the 1st strike.
Not sunk. Not destroyed.
There's no requirement to remove survivors from a vessel before you finish it off.

Protocol Additional (I) to the Geneva Conventions (1977, supplementing the 1949 conventions) defines “shipwrecked” clearly: “persons, whether military or civilian, who are in peril at sea or in other waters as a result of misfortune affecting them or the vessel or aircraft carrying them and who refrain from any act of hostility.”

It's also bullshit in several other contexts
Specifically (under section 3.2.1 “Assistance to Persons, Ships, and Aircraft in Distress”(navy law)) it notes that, to the extent that it can be done “without serious danger to his ship or crew,” a commanding officer “shall proceed with all possible speed to the rescue of persons in distress.”

The obligation is grounded in long-established maritime custom and is codified in international maritime law and treaties (e.g. the 1974 International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), whose norms the USN accepts as customary international law).
So even IF your version of the events happened, something I highly doubt. You are still wrong..unless of course a boat that's crippled and on fire doesn't pose peril.

So try some more guardhouse lawyering.

 

[Billiejeens]

LOL....

Yeah due process is such a burden....as it should be.

Is this in the right thread?

 

[leftwinger]

Fishing boats overloaded with 55gal drums of whale chum I suppose?

 

[Nostra]

It was an unarmed, civilian boat. There is no mention in the UNCLOS a word about "terroristic organisations", and there was no decision of UN SC about equality of Venezuela's cocaine clippers and terrorists. And military ships, according UNCLOS, has no right to attack unarmed civilian ships except only three cases: piracy, slave-trading, misusage of flag.
If we add permission to attack unarmed terrorists' ships in high seas, Russia will attack yachts of several American billionaires who sponsored FBK (declared as terrorist organisation in Russia, but legal in the USA), or, say, Muslim-brothers.

**** the UN.

How's about them apples?

 

[Hollie]

https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/are-deadly-us-strikes-alleged-drug-vessels-legal-2025-10-31/

Dear Lush,

Nothing in the Reuters article makes a case for the a’splodin drug runner boats to be “illegal”.

Thanks.