Perspective: Lets be honest…Aren’t we really at war with illegal invaders? Shouldn’t Trump work that angle with Congress to eradicate them?

I have a hunch that if his daughters got nose piercings and dyed their hair an unapproved color, he'd say "I don't approve of that, but it looks good on you honey."
My daughters are so hardcore they make me look like a liberal… And they know better, if they were to ever pull any sort of liberal bullshit, they would be disowned and cut off immediately
 
How many working here illegally have purple hair and nose rings? Pick your battles, but don't confuse them.
It is the unconventional homosexual gender confused purple hair nose ringing wackos, and super fucked in the head globalists like Unkotare who encourage and support the lunacy
 
Wouldn’t a declaration of war enable Trump to operate without all the meddling from activist judges? In war there is always collateral damage…In war innocent people may be killed or even wrongfully removed from our nation. Trump needs to get Congress thinking about said declaration.
Your thoughts?

What do you think about Trump's recent statement about illegals who work in farms and hotels? I tagged you on another thread, but maybe you didn't see that.

Your thoughts?

The pertinent part starts at :22 seconds in...

 
You don’t think one has to have gone to war to know when their homeland is under attack by foreign nationals do you?
well you just talk like you have been there....maybe you should have signed up instead of leaving it to others...you did tell me that long ago....
 
One more thing, BrokeLoser ...

Your thoughts on Trump seemingly agreeing with Hillary about illegal immigration? I mean... he posted that clip of Hillary on his Truth Social page. And that clip does go along with what he said recently in the clip I posted in post #44.

 
tumbleweed-acegif-46.gif
 
What do you think about Trump's recent statement about illegals who work in farms and hotels? I tagged you on another thread, but maybe you didn't see that.

Your thoughts?

The pertinent part starts at :22 seconds in...


Don’t understand the term “reprieve” do you? It’s ok I understand how hard it is to realize the difference between “illegals” that are trying to be productive members of our society and the hordes that Biden let in and funded with our money so he could get some free votes. Retard
 
Wouldn’t a declaration of war enable Trump to operate without all the meddling from activist judges?

Hasn't he already in effect done that? But in a true, overt declaration of war, I think it has to be against a state or enemy government, not just spurious individuals.

60 trillion laws in the books and yet once again, somehow all of the lawyers have failed us...
 
Don’t understand the term “reprieve” do you? It’s ok I understand how hard it is to realize the difference between “illegals” that are trying to be productive members of our society and the hordes that Biden let in and funded with our money so he could get some free votes. Retard

Talk about missing the point.

It went from "mass deportations of all" to "illegals working on farms and hotels can stay because they're really needed." Basically. THANKFULLY, if you read the comments on the last tweet I just posted, a hell of a lot of people can read the writing on the wall and many are giving up on him. But here on USMB, now you guys are agreeing with his flip? :lol:

So you're OK with rewarding lawbreaking. Because that's what that is... it sends the message that if you come here illegally, no problem... if your boss really needs the cheap labor, we can make you legal.

I mean, that's not that different than the Dem position, for years. Did you even see the Hillary clip he posted?

Anyway, I wanted to know what BrokeLoser thinks about it.
 
Last edited:
well you just talk like you have been there....maybe you should have signed up instead of leaving it to others...you did tell me that long ago....
I’ve never once “talked like I’ve been there”…I’ve said it before, I was never a troubled teen looking for Father Government to pave me a way. I built a hell of a business by 21. I was paying the salaries of badasses in need of government direction.
Now explain how your retarded as fuck shit is relevant to the thread Gustavo?
 
It went from "mass deportations of all" to "illegals working on farms and hotels can stay because they're really needed."
IMO, they can stay if they've committed no crime here and apply for and are accepted for a work visa while here or something. Why shouldn't they stay?

So you're OK with rewarding lawbreaking.
I'm not OK with that, which is why they would have to receive a work visa first, or some other appropriate remuneration.
 
Talk about missing the point.

It went from "mass deportations of all" to "illegals working on farms and hotels can stay because they're really needed." Basically. THANKFULLY, if you read the comments on the last tweet I just posted, a hell of a lot of people can read the writing on the wall and many are giving up on him. But here on USMB, now you guys are agreeing with his flip? :lol:

So you're OK with rewarding lawbreaking. Because that's what that is... it sends the message that if you come here illegally, no problem... if your boss really needs the cheap labor, we can make you legal.

I mean, that's not that different than the Dem position, for years. Did you even see the Hillary clip he posted?

Anyway, I wanted to know what BrokeLoser thinks about it.
Where is he making them legal you fucking twat.
 
IMO, they can stay if they've committed no crime here and apply for and are accepted for a work visa while here or something. Why shouldn't they stay?

Again, that misses the point by a mile. But I'm not going to repeat everything I just said to that other guy.

I'm not OK with that, which is why they would have to receive a work visa first, or some other appropriate remuneration.

No, it IS rewarding lawbreaking. Because unless they came as children (in that case they had no choice) THEY knowingly disregarded and broke the law by crossing the border illegally. And by making them legal, even if it means going through a process, you're rewarding that initial lawbreaking.

I can't believe I even have to argue this with you staunch Trumpers. I mean... maybe illegal immigration isn't a strong issue for you (like it is with BrokeLoser) but that's one of the main reasons why people voted for him.

But even if it isn't the most important issue to you.... how the blatant flip-flopping (just like he did on H1B visas) and empty campaign rhetoric doesn't bother you is mind-boggling to me.
 
So you're dense AND vulgar. What a combo.

Here you go. Maybe you didn't watch the video....


Can you define “reprieve”? Cause that seems temporary as in he’s not just grabbing everyone he suspects as illegal and throwing them on the first plane out of here. Isn’t that what you pussies wanted? You were so concerned about the lowlife scumbags he’s deporting not having their “due process”
Oh I see you’re the typical left wing bitch that just says Trump bad and Trump wrong about every fucking thing. Keep it up it worked so well for you in 2024 I’m sure it’s the correct course of action for your trash party
 
Can you define “reprieve”? Cause that seems temporary as in he’s not just grabbing everyone he suspects as illegal and throwing them on the first plane out of here. Isn’t that what you pussies wanted? You were so concerned about the lowlife scumbags he’s deporting not having their “due process”
Oh I see you’re the typical left wing bitch that just says Trump bad and Trump wrong about every fucking thing. Keep it up it worked so well for you in 2024 I’m sure it’s the correct course of action for your trash party

WATCH THE VIDEO.
 
Again, that misses the point by a mile. But I'm not going to repeat everything I just said to that other guy.
Whatever point you thought YOU were discussing, I was making my own point.

No, it IS rewarding lawbreaking. Because unless they came as children (in that case they had no choice) THEY knowingly disregarded and broke the law by crossing the border illegally. And by making them legal, even if it means going through a process, you're rewarding that initial lawbreaking.
Valid point. What about if they had to pay a fine first, then be required to leave and apply for reentry? I'm only talking about people who committed no crime and were productive while here. Didn't Trump say that he wanted people to self-deport and if they did, they avoided penalties? This might be the most cost-effective, practical way of dealing with up to 20 million people.

I can't believe I even have to argue this with you staunch Trumpers.
I did not realize I was arguing anything with you? I just entered the conversation. You have argued no point with me other than to say we are rewarding criminals which is really not in dispute. Unless you want to see 20 million people herded into giant FEMA work camps.

I mean... maybe illegal immigration isn't a strong issue for you (like it is with BrokeLoser) but that's one of the main reasons why people voted for him.
Well, Trump is getting people out, dissuading more from coming in, and strengthening the border, so just what is your beef? You want every illegal beaten and thrown into a damp, dark, rat-infested cell?

But even if it isn't the most important issue to you.... how the blatant flip-flopping (just like he did on H1B visas) and empty campaign rhetoric doesn't bother you is mind-boggling to me.
Boy, you sure pick up on a lot more than me. So your point is that you are mad that Trump is only doing 800X more than the last six presidents combined because he remains open on issues and is willing to change or adapt as needed if things go differently than planned? I always thought adaptability and flexibility were positive attributes. I did not realize you were after Adolf Hitler and if he said xyz in 1923, you expect him to hold that same exact position 102 years later.
 
Talk about missing the point.

It went from "mass deportations of all" to "illegals working on farms and hotels can stay because they're really needed." Basically. THANKFULLY, if you read the comments on the last tweet I just posted, a hell of a lot of people can read the writing on the wall and many are giving up on him. But here on USMB, now you guys are agreeing with his flip? :lol:

So you're OK with rewarding lawbreaking. Because that's what that is... it sends the message that if you come here illegally, no problem... if your boss really needs the cheap labor, we can make you legal.

I mean, that's not that different than the Dem position, for years. Did you even see the Hillary clip he posted?

Anyway, I wanted to know what BrokeLoser thinks about it.

IMO, they can stay if they've committed no crime here and apply for and are accepted for a work visa while here or something. Why shouldn't they stay?


I'm not OK with that, which is why they would have to receive a work visa first, or some other appropriate remuneration.
NOPE…we aren’t a nation that rewards criminality on any level for any reason. We don’t need Mexico’s people…Send every single one back home, send every single anchor baby here on a stolen citizenship home, send every single DACA ‘kid’ home…Let’s reset and start all over…lets let good real core Americans decide who gets to help them build a nation.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom