No I don't believe in answers that don't exist yet. What I do is remain open to all possibilities and skeptical of stories that don't make sense.
Cool. Then you aren't an atheist. The word is agnostic.
Who's you guys? Theists.
And the evidence does not point to a creator in fact the "evidence" beyond your superstitions and wishful thinking shows there is no god. Or at least zero evidence YET.
Why there is no god
And of course you don't think about it too deeply. Clearly you haven't thought it through any deeper than on a basic level.
Why there is no god
Last thing. If man didn't invent god, how come we did invent all the organized religions that have come and gone? We made up Zeus but not Jesus or Mohammad?
See what you are doing? You are cherry picking and not thinking clearly. You didn't say you were a Christian Muslim or Jew. You just said you believe in god. So then you must be admitting that you don't buy into the organized religions. If you don't, why don't you? Because they are corrupt and man made? If that's possible, so too might god. In fact its highly likely.
So you keep believing in a god and don't put that much thought into it. That would make you just like the rest of your fellow theists who haven't put that much thought into it either.
Like most self professed atheists, you're confused and you're an asshole. Exactly my point in the beginning. You don't decide for me what proof I see looking at the world around me. You also can't read because it apparently is blocked by your fundamentalism. I said I wasn't religious, period. I didn't "admit" to anything.
Attacking religions is all you have for proof of a secular creation event. That's too much faith for me.
I can’t believe/understand a world without God OR No god is too unlikely.
Argument from incredulity / Lack of imagination and
Argumentum ad Ignorantiam. Ignores and does not eliminate the fact that something can seem incredible or unlikely and still be true, or appear to be obvious or likely and yet still be false.
The world is the way it is. Reality does not bend to our personal whim and facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. Our personal belief in something does not automatically make it real or true and, conversely, our lack of understanding of a topic does not make it false.
Until we understand something we “do not know”. Positing a ‘god’ in place of admitting personal ignorance is an unfounded leap which demonstrates a fundamental lack of humility.
The existence and non-existence of a god are not equally probable outcomes. The majority of things we can possibly imagine do not exist. Thus, belief is not as valid a position as skepticism when dealing with unsupported or unfalsifiable claims. Agnostic atheism is
the most rational position.
See also:
Critical thinking (a must watch), Richard Feynman on
Doubt and Uncertainty (a must watch).
“It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.” – Carl Sagan
“God is an ever-receding pocket of ignorance that’s getting smaller and smaller as time goes on.”- Neil deGrasse Tyson
Militant atheists are just as bad as religious ones.
No, they’re
not. There are no calls for
slavery,
rape or
murder in the atheist holy book.
Atheists are most often called ‘militant’ when they passionately defend reason and advocate critical thinking. The bar theists set for perceived hostility appears to be any atheist simply voicing an opinion in dissent of religious belief. In contrast, the bar atheists set for perceived theistic hostility is any form of religiously motivated violence or oppression.
Atheism does not preclude someone from being argumentative or insensitive; those things are simply seen as being preferable to killing one another over an imaginary friend.
A ‘militant’ atheist will debate in a University or appeal for the separation of religion and government. A militant theist will
kill doctors,
stone women to death,
incite religious war, restrict sexual and gender equality and convince children they are
flawed and worthless – all under the instruction of their imagined ‘god’ or holy book.
It can be argued that there is
no such thing as a ‘militant’ atheist, that the term is itself a misnomer, because there is simply no ideology or philosophy in atheism to be militant about. If an atheist is someone who lacks belief in gods, then a ‘militant’ atheist is apparently someone who passionately lacks a belief in gods. All other possible beliefs and ideologies – including any desire to
oppress theism – come from outside atheism. This is in contrast to religious belief, which often includes a set of laws and commandments purportedly derived from a supernatural source about which one can be ‘militant’.
Note: ‘Militant’ atheism is most often confused with
gosateizm (state atheism), which was based on the ideology of Marxism-Leninism. It was this ideology which was responsible for the oppression and murder of theists under several 20th century communist regimes. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in gods with no inherit moral, political or philosophical baggage.
See also:
The Ethics of Belief (a must read),
Richard Dawkins on Militant Atheism,
Christian Terrorism,
Islamic Terrorism, Atheist Terrorism (no link found).
“I’m sorry if my insensitivity towards your beliefs offends you. But guess what – your religious wars, jihads, crusades, inquisitions, censoring of free speech, brainwashing of children, forcing girls into underage marriages, female genital mutilation, stoning, pederasty, homophobia and rejection of science and reason offend me. So I guess we’re even.” – Anonymous