Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
The idea that workers have value is not socialist.
Hang on... Socialism at its core is about society solving problems rather than individuals. To say socialism doesn't work in America is to say America doesn't function well as a society... That is quite anti American statement.
I think putting people in charge of a society who doesn't think the society works and wants to weaken the society is fundamentally flawed. As it would mean American society would be weakened and thus America itself would be weakened.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
The idea that workers have value is not socialist.
Hang on... Socialism at its core is about society solving problems rather than individuals. To say socialism doesn't work in America is to say America doesn't function well as a society... That is quite anti American statement.
The idea that conservatives don't value workers is a LIE invented by lowlife scum filth liberals.
Just for a recent example......How many of the GOP candidates are FOR raising the minimum wage?
Further, how many right wing "leaders" are for strengthening unions?
Cruz now talking about carpeting bombing..."We're going to light all of their stuff on fire."
Just heard him say that.
Is that what you righties want for this country?
(Poor Ted, he doesn't care about all the kids that will be killed in his death march ...That's because they've been born already.)
Are you freaking shitting me? WWII ring a bell? Firebombing entire cities, Japanese internment camps, dropping atomic bombs? Vietnam? WTF lib.
If you're comparing the reasons for WWII to the series of other conflicts we've wasted lives and treasury, then you're another moronic right winger who chooses to "interpret" history.
But military analysts note that the first Gulf War was the beginning of the growing use of precision-guided weapons. And in that war, unlike the fight against ISIS, the U.S. was going against Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's large numbers of conventional armed troops in the field -- readily detectable targets separate from civilian populations.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
because we don't trust you idiots with the power, and our mistrust has been proven again and again.
Letting progressives have control of more and more government power is like handing an MLRS launch controller to a toddler.
How did you suffer eight years of Bill Clinton? How did the nation suffer 8 years of Bush? Let's start with the crash of '08 and two failed wars....
Now tell us how Obama has taken your guns away and turned America into a military state, as we were warned. Where's the Sharia law? Burkhas? His "brotherhood"? He's really running out of time for this.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
The idea that workers have value is not socialist.
Hang on... Socialism at its core is about society solving problems rather than individuals. To say socialism doesn't work in America is to say America doesn't function well as a society... That is quite anti American statement.
I think putting people in charge of a society who doesn't think the society works and wants to weaken the society is fundamentally flawed. As it would mean American society would be weakened and thus America itself would be weakened.
Carpet bombing would not harm ISIS. But it would achieve the mass slaughter of hostage civilians.
Harming ISIS makes the baby Obama cry.
Remember when... people worked...everyone and sometimes two jobs to make ends meet... Remember when... OWS insisted on government subsidizing their own lives by taking from the 1% and allowing them to refuse to work.Conservatives generally agree that the Federal government is taking over for personal responsibility. Rights, to them is the right to obtain something, not be given that same thing unless there is a good reason the citizen could not gain that object on his own.I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
Liberals on the other hand believe in everyone is equal and should never be in need regardless of their own disposition in life. If a person has a problem, he looks to the government to solve it for him.
Naturally the perfect solution would be to entwine the two, so society can meet the needs of the people only after it is shown they cannot solve their problems themselves. As a country, we need to be personally responsible for what we have, but the government should meet the needs of those who are physically or mentally unable to provide for themselves.
Like the Ideal Gas Law, your perfect solution is flawed and cannot work in the real world, simply because everyone would vote themselves the goodies if they could (and they currently are).
Remember when... people worked...everyone and sometimes two jobs to make ends meet... Remember when... OWS insisted on government subsidizing their own lives by taking from the 1% and allowing them to refuse to work.Conservatives generally agree that the Federal government is taking over for personal responsibility. Rights, to them is the right to obtain something, not be given that same thing unless there is a good reason the citizen could not gain that object on his own.I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
Liberals on the other hand believe in everyone is equal and should never be in need regardless of their own disposition in life. If a person has a problem, he looks to the government to solve it for him.
Naturally the perfect solution would be to entwine the two, so society can meet the needs of the people only after it is shown they cannot solve their problems themselves. As a country, we need to be personally responsible for what we have, but the government should meet the needs of those who are physically or mentally unable to provide for themselves.
Like the Ideal Gas Law, your perfect solution is flawed and cannot work in the real world, simply because everyone would vote themselves the goodies if they could (and they currently are).
Carpet bombing would not harm ISIS. But it would achieve the mass slaughter of hostage civilians.
Good job!
Retard. Take your Hollywood movie knowledge of warfare elsewhere.
Carpet bombing would not harm ISIS. But it would achieve the mass slaughter of hostage civilians.
Good job!
Retard. Take your Hollywood movie knowledge of warfare elsewhere.
Yes, Dresden lost the war for us.
Look Jake, if we were to actually start dropping some of the bombs on the sorties that fly out, would that upset? Obviously it upsets Obama, but would you be upset?
Should we call first, and let ISIS know we are planning a bombing run, so no democrat assets get hurt?
Why would you resort to firebombing when we no longer need to? Why would you bomb civilians period?
Why would you resort to firebombing when we no longer need to? Why would you bomb civilians period?
We don't need to because ISIS is defeated and just the JV team?
That is not an answer to the question I asked you.
That is not an answer to the question I asked you.
It was the perfect answer to the partisan hackery you offered.
Defeating ISIS will first require that we actually want to defeat them. Currently we do not.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
.
I've always wondered the why most right wingers deride the federal government, while doing everything possible to be at the helm of such a government.
They seem to simply love capitalism while neglecting that such capitalism could not flourish and even survive without the democratic (and, YES, socialistic) precepts that workers are just as valuable as corporations.
