PERMANENT WAR UPDATE: "Total Failure": Pentagon Spends $41 Million Training 4 or 5 Syrian Fighters..

paulitician

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
38,401
Reaction score
4,175
Points
1,130
This after creating ISIS in the first place. Ah, more Foreign Interventionism. Ya gotta love it... Or do ya?


Only about ā€œfour or fiveā€ U.S.-trained Syrian rebels remain on the battlefield to take on the Islamic State

Earlier today, US Central Command Gen. Lloyd Austin III seemed to suggest that US SpecOps were fighting alongside YPG in Syria. As we noted when the news hit, if true that won’t go over well with Turkey’s Erdogan, Washington’s brand new coalition partner against ISIS who has made no secret of his distrust for the YPG.

Four hours later, the Pentagon claimed that Austin’s words were taken out of context and that in fact, US forces had not (yet) played a combat role. But just in case Washington does finally decide to admit that US boots are indeed on the ground along with Russian boots, it can always simply point to its own miserable operational failure as justification for why the previous arrangement just wasn’t going to cut it when it comes to ā€œdegradingā€ militant capabilities. Read on.

As you may recall, earlier this year the Pentagon decided to try its hand at training an ā€œappropriately vetted [group] of Syrian opposition recruitsā€ whose mission would be to ā€œdegrade and ultimately defeat ISIL.ā€

There are two immediately amusing things about the effort: 1) the notion of ā€œappropriate vetting,ā€ and 2) this effectively represented the DoD training a new group of Syrian fighters in an effort to destroy another group of Syrian fighters that were trained by the CIA but who ended up adding ā€œestablish medieval caliphateā€...

Read More:
ā€œTotal Failureā€: Pentagon Spends $41 Million Training ā€œFour Or Fiveā€ Syrian Fighters




 
So you fund & arm ISIS fighters in Syria, and then fail miserably at funding & arming more Syrian fighters to fight ISIS? Oh boy, makes perfect sense. What a mess.
 
This after creating ISIS in the first place. Ah, more Foreign Interventionism. Ya gotta love it... Or do ya?


Only about ā€œfour or fiveā€ U.S.-trained Syrian rebels remain on the battlefield to take on the Islamic State

Earlier today, US Central Command Gen. Lloyd Austin III seemed to suggest that US SpecOps were fighting alongside YPG in Syria. As we noted when the news hit, if true that won’t go over well with Turkey’s Erdogan, Washington’s brand new coalition partner against ISIS who has made no secret of his distrust for the YPG.

Four hours later, the Pentagon claimed that Austin’s words were taken out of context and that in fact, US forces had not (yet) played a combat role. But just in case Washington does finally decide to admit that US boots are indeed on the ground along with Russian boots, it can always simply point to its own miserable operational failure as justification for why the previous arrangement just wasn’t going to cut it when it comes to ā€œdegradingā€ militant capabilities. Read on.

As you may recall, earlier this year the Pentagon decided to try its hand at training an ā€œappropriately vetted [group] of Syrian opposition recruitsā€ whose mission would be to ā€œdegrade and ultimately defeat ISIL.ā€

There are two immediately amusing things about the effort: 1) the notion of ā€œappropriate vetting,ā€ and 2) this effectively represented the DoD training a new group of Syrian fighters in an effort to destroy another group of Syrian fighters that were trained by the CIA but who ended up adding ā€œestablish medieval caliphateā€...

Read More:
ā€œTotal Failureā€: Pentagon Spends $41 Million Training ā€œFour Or Fiveā€ Syrian Fighters





We shouldn't be doing anything there.
 
Back
Top Bottom