Once again you prove you haven't been paying attention or even read through this thread
Do so and come back
I’ve been paying attention. People just don’t understand how the internet archive works and that it doesn’t archive every website.
In the days since an assailant broke into the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and attacked her husband with a hammer, internet users have amplified false claims that mock the victim and give credence to insidious conspiracy theories about the incident.
apnews.com
CLAIM: Two far-right websites attributed to DePape were created the day of the attack and deleted the next day, proving a left-wing attempt to “smear” him.
THE FACTS: The websites existed before the attack, and had entries dating back years, according to AP reporting.
This claim reflects a misunderstanding of the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, an online tool that allows people to visit past versions of websites that users and internet bots have archived. The tool does not show when a website was created.
After Pelosi was attacked, journalists researching the man identified as his assailant
wrote about web blogsthat had been posted under the name David DePape in recent months. The blogs contained political rants and references to the QAnon conspiracy theory.
Social media users and conservative websites over the weekend questioned whether these blogs were real, claiming that the Wayback Machine only showed activity on the sites from the past two days.
However, an AP reporter viewed entries on the sites that predated the attack, and the domain registration on one of the sites shows it was registered last month by a David DePape.
The Wayback Machine also does not include a full history of every website.
“Some sites may not be included because the automated crawlers were unaware of their existence at the time of the crawl,” reads an
online information page about the tool. “It’s also possible that some sites were not archived because they were password protected, blocked by robots.txt, or otherwise inaccessible to our automated systems. Site owners might have also requested that their sites be excluded from the Wayback Machine.”