Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
Lets see so far NOT ONE witness has had any ACTUAL knowledge of any crime. NOT one witness and the President released the transcript of the call AND the Ukrainians say nothing untoward happened. The people in denial are you lying ass democrats. No evidence yet Trump is Guilty of..... what what EXACTLY again is he guilty of? You can not even articulate that as a claim.
Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
What "crimes" is he hiding?
Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
What "crimes" is he hiding?
Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
Look here retard. Misuse of power, extortion, bribery, obstruction. There will be additions to that list before it's done. Face the stark reality that Trump is a dirty bastard of a shit president. Lesson over.Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
The whistleblower is irrelevant, liar. Trump already admitted it, and repeated his crime live, on camera.The whistleblower needs to testifyFat donnie is welcome to testify under oath.WTF enough is enough of the bullshit after do a search why is FOX news the only source that I could find that reported this unAmerican agenda of the democrat party? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH time to end the witch hunt. Leftist maybe you'll be in the same position of guilty until you prove that you are innocent.
Gidley told "The Story" that Pelosi's comments effectively mean Trump is responsible for proving he is not guilty -- an assertion that runs counter to the American mantra of "innocent until proven guilty."
"This is a weird moment in politics," Gidley said. "Because, the speaker of the House -- an elected Democrat -- as they continue to push communism and socialism on the American people, whether it be with health care or taking away your paycheck and giving it to other people, they literally want to upturn and then get rid of the justice system."
"What she's saying is, 'no, you're now guilty -- you have to prove your innocence.'"
Pelosi comments show Democrats want to 'overturn' the American justice system: White House spokesman
Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
Dumbass we've had one witness after another testifying to how Trump's personal lawyer was running a covert operation to subvert our normal foreign policy channels to misuse American millitary aid to extort political campaign contributions from a foreign country.
Look here retard. Misuse of power, extortion, bribery, obstruction. There will be additions to that list before it's done. Face the stark reality that Trump is a dirty bastard of a shit president. Lesson over.Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
No, it's up to the Senate to determine guilt from the evidence presented. So far only one sort of evidence has been presented to the investigation.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
what crime? where is that evidence the chairman said he had proving Trump colluded with the Russians? Guess what democrats are committing crimes to prove the president committed a crime. Think about that before you respond.I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guiltSorry, Trump's absolute refusal to provide one scrap of evidence or allow any of his henchmen to testify under oath can only mean one thing. When police detectives encounter a totally uncooperative witness what do they do? They damned sure don't presume innocence. These hearings are not a court proceeding where a presumption of innocence is the rule.
No, it's up to the democrats to prove that a crime was committed that's at the impeachment worthy level.No, it's up to the Senate to determine guilt from the evidence presented. So far only one sort of evidence has been presented to the investigation.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
The whistleblower is irrelevant? it was the whistleblower and Schiff that got this whole thing started. I believe Schiff is the whistleblower or so my sources tell me.The whistleblower is irrelevant, liar. Trump already admitted it, and repeated his crime live, on camera.The whistleblower needs to testifyFat donnie is welcome to testify under oath.WTF enough is enough of the bullshit after do a search why is FOX news the only source that I could find that reported this unAmerican agenda of the democrat party? ENOUGH IS ENOUGH time to end the witch hunt. Leftist maybe you'll be in the same position of guilty until you prove that you are innocent.
Gidley told "The Story" that Pelosi's comments effectively mean Trump is responsible for proving he is not guilty -- an assertion that runs counter to the American mantra of "innocent until proven guilty."
"This is a weird moment in politics," Gidley said. "Because, the speaker of the House -- an elected Democrat -- as they continue to push communism and socialism on the American people, whether it be with health care or taking away your paycheck and giving it to other people, they literally want to upturn and then get rid of the justice system."
"What she's saying is, 'no, you're now guilty -- you have to prove your innocence.'"
Pelosi comments show Democrats want to 'overturn' the American justice system: White House spokesman
You talk as if obama was still president.Look here retard. Misuse of power, extortion, bribery, obstruction. There will be additions to that list before it's done. Face the stark reality that Trump is a dirty bastard of a shit president. Lesson over.Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
SO WE HAVE THE BOWTIE KID BUTTHURT FEELINGS BECAUSE THE PRESIDENT DIDN'T USE US.Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.He doesn't have to present anything it's up to democrats to present guilt
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
Dumbass we've had one witness after another testifying to how Trump's personal lawyer, chief of staff and ambasodor to EU were running a covert operation to circumvent our normal foreign policy channels and misuse American millitary aid to extort political campaign contributions from a foreign country.
That's great they could read your crayon letters to translate it into words lolLets see so far NOT ONE witness has had any ACTUAL knowledge of any crime. NOT one witness and the President released the transcript of the call AND the Ukrainians say nothing untoward happened. The people in denial are you lying ass democrats. No evidence yet Trump is Guilty of..... what what EXACTLY again is he guilty of? You can not even articulate that as a claim.
Hey moron, if everything is on the up and up, why do President's men who actually had direct contact with him on this are either lying to Congress or ignoring subpoenas to come before Congress and testify?
Trump’s most favorable witness faces credibility crisis
The crime is using American millitary aid to extort political campaign contributions from a foreign country. Witnesses testified to the details of how this was carried out.
The crime is Obstruction of Justice and Congressional Investigations.
The crime is flagrant Abuse of Power.
And what are you half-braindead righwing lemmings doing in this notable time in political history? Carrying the dirty water for the swamp monster in our White House.
Why are you even discussing this topic when you refuse to stay informed?I guess it's the best option when you are hiding worse crimes than obstruction of justice. It's the same calculation Nixon made.
What "crimes" is he hiding?
No, seriously: Please feel free to list these "crimes" he's "hiding." There hasn't been one single witness throughout the impeachment inquiry, who could even substantiate a single allegation.
So what "crimes" are you referring to? That he hurt your sensitive little snowflake feelings?
Dumbass we've had one witness after another testifying to how Trump's personal lawyer was running a covert operation to subvert our normal foreign policy channels to misuse American millitary aid to extort political campaign contributions from a foreign country.
You have a bad habit of using an insulting or abusive word to start every one of your responses. That's typically representative of someone who was abused by their parents. I'm just sayin'.
1. Covert back-channels are not illegal, every President uses them.
2. The Javelin missiles were ultimately delivered, which is more than I can say for Obama. Ukraine begged him for weapons and he never supplied them.
3. Investigating Ukrainian corruption as per the agreement Obama established with them, is not a "political contribution."
In other words, you have nothing.
