Pelosi thinks she's the Supreme Leader of the USA

[struth]

if you ever feel so inclined to get caught up on real facts, & got 40 minutes to absorb it - i recommend this:

i thought you wanted to use unbiased sources? no propaganda from the NY Times

 

[playtime]

a good amount of dembots still refuse to believe the mueller report

that's because the full unredacted report has never been revealed. 'collusion' is not a legal term - but conspiracy is & mueller's DOJ mandate never included the part to 'follow the money'.

he did find & documented 10 counts of obstruction that the (R) controlled congress refused to follow up on.

 

[22lcidw]

because donny ate kevin's spine.

If Kevin becomes Speaker of the house, there are people who believe he will be like Boehner and Ryan. Unless he proves different. We have been lied to so many times.

 

[playtime]

stand down? did you even read the memo you posted? he authorized the NG in that memo. Read it for yourself real slowly

he never gave the orders. several hours passed & it was PENCE who finally gave the ok to get them in there. the DCNG already testified to that.

you'll probably hear it again.

 

[playtime]

i thought you wanted to use unbiased sources? no propaganda from the NY Times

there is no difference between the NYT & WaPo or rupert murdoch's own WSJ when it comes to reporting factual news ... it's their OP/EDs that are biased. learn to recognize that. now - had i used HuffPo, or MSNBC, or daily kos - you would have a point... whch is why i would never use them. same goes if you were to use FOX, breitbart or gateway pundit.

New York Times​

Last updated on March 31st, 2021 at 04:59 pm

---

LEFT-CENTER BIAS​

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

New York Times

 

[August West]

i thought you wanted to use unbiased sources? no propaganda from the NY Times

One of the top 5 newspapers in the world is a newspaper you`ve never seen a copy of. Which Trump approved papers do you read?

 

[LeftofLeft]

there will be facts. facts that are undeniable... facts presented by real time first person eye witness accounts & footage from police body cams.

the FACT that it is not going to be political - is what the (R)s are CONcerned about. & it's all going to be public with no spin - at least the hearings aired live on CSPAN & other unbiased outlets uninterupted, unedited.

some 'news' outlets won't air it live.... but will show edited segments no doubt to influence the poorly educated that donny loves long time.

Pelosi obviously disagrees with you. If she didn’t, she would not be going the extra mile with the egregious rules; including, who sits on the commission, who doesn’t.

 

[playtime]

Pelosi obviously disagrees with you. If she didn’t, she would not be going the extra mile with the egregious rules; including, who sits on the commission, who doesn’t.

ahhhh... but that wasn't the original plan. the original plan was negotiated & approved by the (R)s in the dealing - was to give total equality in every aspect for both sides. how pissed the (R) dude who negotiated it - that thought a deal was reached until it went to the floor for a vote.

the (R)s had a deal - said they were gonna vote to seal it & then reneged.

now they are pissed because they took a chance & blew it. tutt tutt now they reap what they sowed.

 

[LeftofLeft]

ahhhh... but that wasn't the original plan. the original plan was negotiated & approved by the (R)s in the dealing - was to give total equality in every aspect for both sides. how pissed the (R) dude who negotiated it - that thought a deal was reached until it went to the floor for a vote.

the (R)s had a deal - said they were gonna vote to seal it & then reneged.

now they are pissed because they took a chance & blew it. tutt tutt now they reap what they sowed.

I am a lifelong Washingtonian. Born in DC…, even interned (as a Democrat) in that Capitol Dome with the sausage factory under it. Go figure, a political party reneges at the last moment prior to vote….because that’s never happened in Congress before; right?

Regardless, taking away equal representation for both parties or cherry picking members for the other side is collectively overreaching and only weakens your own position.

 

[playtime]

Go figure, a political party reneges at the last moment prior to vote….because that’s never happened in Congress before; right?

it's never happened under an investigation into an attempted bloody coup & storming the US capital building & the hunting of congress critters.

Regardless, taking away equal representation for both parties

that the (R)s chose not to have...

or cherry picking members for the other side

that the (R)s chose that course after refusing the ability to have their members seated unfettered

is collectively overreaching and only weakens your own position.

finding out the facts can only strengthen it. & that would have been for both sides.

 

[struth]

One of the top 5 newspapers in the world is a newspaper you`ve never seen a copy of. Which Trump approved papers do you read?

i don’t know which ones he approves of or reads

I read the NY Times, sometimes, the oldest paper in the US, the NY Post,
USA Today, sometimes. The Washington Post daily, as well as my local paper daily

All have their pros and cons

but what i was responding to wasn’t the actual paper or news, but a documentary of sorts…propaganda ,

 

[struth]

there is no difference between the NYT & WaPo or rupert murdoch's own WSJ when it comes to reporting factual news ... it's their OP/EDs that are biased. learn to recognize that. now - had i used HuffPo, or MSNBC, or daily kos - you would have a point... whch is why i would never use them. same goes if you were to use FOX, breitbart or gateway pundit.

New York Times​

Last updated on March 31st, 2021 at 04:59 pm

---

LEFT-CENTER BIAS​

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor liberal causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation. See all Left-Center sources.

• Overall, we rate the New York Times Left-Center biased based on word and story selection that moderately favors the left but highly factual and considered one of the most reliable sources for news information due to proper sourcing and well-respected journalists/editors. The failed fact checks that occurred were on Op-Ed’s and not straight news reporting.

New York Times

oh there is a difference, on what and how they report the news

anyway this was a documentary not a news article

 

[struth]

he never gave the orders. several hours passed & it was PENCE who finally gave the ok to get them in there. the DCNG already testified to that.

you'll probably hear it again.

the memo you posted has the Sec of Def authorizing the NG.

not sure what order you are talking about

 

[LeftofLeft]

it's never happened under an investigation into an attempted bloody coup & storming the US capital building & the hunting of congress critters.



that the (R)s chose not to have...




that the (R)s chose that course after refusing the ability to have their members seated unfettered




finding out the facts can only strengthen it. & that would have been for both sides.

Then stop cherry picking rules and participants and find out facts. Otherwise, proceed with a Democrat Pelosi led farce where you paint this as “a bloody coup” and “storming of the US Capitol”. As for “storming” the Capitol, the gates were opened for the few hundred vandalized. As for blood, that blood was caused by police shooting a protestor….. the one time you people cheered the police for shooting someone unarmed, otherwise, you are screeching for police to be defunded.

 

[woodwork201]

that's because the full unredacted report has never been revealed. 'collusion' is not a legal term - but conspiracy is & mueller's DOJ mandate never included the part to 'follow the money'.

he did find & documented 10 counts of obstruction that the (R) controlled congress refused to follow up on.

Mueller's job was not to make impeachment referrals to Congress; his job was to find and prosecute crimes. He didn't find crimes so he didn't prosecute crimes.

His job was not to report to Congress; it was to report to the Attorney General and copy Congress. When he couldn't find any criminal acts, he decided to play up to Congress and try for the impeachment.

 

[woodwork201]

If Kevin becomes Speaker of the house, there are people who believe he will be like Boehner and Ryan. Unless he proves different. We have been lied to so many times.

The Republicans make great candidates, full of conservative talk and promises but, once elected, there's not a single one of them who keeps their promises - and yet we keep electing them over and over and over again.

 

[playtime]

propaganda

facts.

in documentary style.

 

[playtime]

oh there is a difference, on what and how they report the news

anyway this was a documentary not a news article

like this wasn't.

either? i know it's short - but factual.... it's so short compared to the 40 minutes of footage of DOCUMENTED facts that occured on jan 6.




insurrection happened on jan 6th.. at donny's urging. the truth will be seen.

 

[struth]

facts.

in documentary style.

spin…hence propaganda

 

[playtime]

the memo you posted has the Sec of Def authorizing the NG.

not sure what order you are talking about

only on his command. THAT command never happened despite the CP begging for the NG back up.

have you not heard any of that audio? or the commander of the NG who already testified?

HOURS passed & no declaration from the one put in command by donny.