Pelosi praises insurrectionists who stormed Capital. “Impressive show of democracy in action”

Posted the same a week ago. :)

 
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

 
Same old garbage wrapped up in new fishwrap. Trump did NOT threaten a coup!
Even the left has to appreciate the irony of stealing the presidential election and then attacking Trump when
he tries to expose the theft and wants government to correct the matter.

The left and it's flying monkeys are engaging in pure Marxism. It will not stand. We all know what we've seen.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

^^^^^^Defends insurrection^^^^^
 
Regretfully mainstream propaganda networks never revisit prior Dimbo statements, only those on the right of left receive such scrutiny, thus hypocrisy is a learned behavior exhibited by the koolaid gang.
 
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

^^^^^^Defends insurrection^^^^^

"As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent,"
 
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

^^^^^^Defends insurrection^^^^^

"As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent,"
So taking over a capital is OK as long as it’s peaceful.

Got it.
 
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

^^^^^^Defends insurrection^^^^^

"As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent,"
So taking over a capital is OK as long as it’s peaceful.

Got it.

How many guards did they beat during the months of protests? 0

How many folks got trample to death during the months of protests. 0
 
Funny how things change. The word hypocrite comes to mind.



In her own world of dementia and being as old as dirt, like Biden, she forgets her past comments and hypocrisies are recorded, saved, and can be brought back up in a minute.
 
There was civil disobedience, but not violence or gunshots. The windows were used by Democratic legislators who moved their desks outside to hold office hours or let constituents and others in because they were not permitted to enter the building.

THE MORNING NEWSLETTER
Subscribe now.


“Trying to draw false equivalence is pretty thin cover when one party has been cheering on Trump’s sedition right up until the moment it turned violent,” says Sen. Chris Larson (D-Milwaukee). “As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent, though Scott Walker admitted he had thought about planting troublemakers to make them that way.”

Sen. Chris Larson (via Facebook)
Sen. Chris Larson
(via Facebook)
Still, Steineke argued the comparison was accurate: “Capitol buildings in both cases were taken over by protestors. I was there at the Wisconsin Capitol. We were trying to conduct our business and were prevented by protestors storming the Capitol. So yes, it’s similar.”

Former Rep. Michelle Litjens, now married to Speaker Robin Vos, added her own recollections of Act 10 from her time in the Assembly. “The DC protestors have gone too far, be strong. In WI folks were sleeping on the floors/hallways, living in the Capitol, bathing in the bathrooms, blocking entrances, screaming and spitting on us in 2011. Stand your ground Congress. It will be over soon #dcprotest”

Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz (D-Oshkosh) says he would never want to diminish the tension Republicans may have felt at the sight of tens of thousands of people at the Capitol opposing their actions to curtail workers’ rights during Act 10 protests and, of course, not the seriousness of death threats.

What strikes him as a stark difference — more so than the level of the violence in D.C. — was what sparked the two protests.

“The intent behind these actions would seem to be considerably different,” says Hintz. He points out that former Gov. Scott Walker campaigned on being willing to bargain with workers, saying individuals and families “felt betrayed by a lie … that had an impact on their economic security and their workplace security.”

“Protesting a policy with an outcome that could be good or bad for people is not the same as threatening a coup.

^^^^^^Defends insurrection^^^^^

"As much as those covering for domestic terrorism today would like to re-write history, the 2011 Wisconsin protests were never violent,"
So taking over a capital is OK as long as it’s peaceful.

Got it.

How many guards did they beat during the months of protests? 0

How many folks got trample to death during the months of protests. 0
Non answer.

try again.
 

Forum List

Back
Top