Pelosi Exposed: House Sergeant at Arms Accused of ‘Covering for Her’ on Capitol Riots Security

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
5,710
Reaction score
8,593
Points
2,280
Location
North Carolina
Pelosi Exposed:
House Sergeant at Arms Accused of ‘Covering for Her’ on Capitol Riots Security
Pelosi Exposed: House Sergeant at Arms Accused of 'Covering for Her' on Capitol Riots Security - Becker News
28 Feb 2021 ~~ By Kyle Becker

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has carefully tried to stage-manage the fallout of the Capitol riots. She has proposed a 9/11-style commission, headed by a blatantly partisan general, in order to purportedly get to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th.
The decision came on the same day she was served notice by high-ranking Republicans that she herself has many serious questions to answer regarding the Capitol attacks.
The questions include what she knew about reports of a planned attack on the Capitol building; why security requests from the former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was turned down by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms six times; and why the Capitol security was so woeful that police officers even held the doors open for rioters and gawked as unarmed miscreants took over the Senate chamber.
Speaker Pelosi is now being accused of having weakened security before and during the Capitol riots due to “optics.” A report from the Daily Caller citing multiple anonymous sources say the former House Sergeant at Arms is “covering for her.”
The Daily Caller provides a timeline that exposes the problematic timing of Irving reportedly being contacted on the request.
The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 p.m, according to CNN. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.​
“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request?” one of the sources told the Daily Caller.
~Snip~
Earlier, on June 2, 2020, Pelosi called Trump a “fanner of the flames” after police had cleared protesters from outside the White House a day before.



Comment:
The Sunday Evening 'Fake' news will be filled with the latest “lies Trump spoke about” today at the CPAC
The Quisling Media will gleefully focus on the evil Trump who is out of office over the corruption of Washington D.C politicians whose machinations are destroying the foundations of the USA.
Obviously, the breach of the Capital was perpetrated by anti-Trump politicians funding Antifa to produce a false flag operation on january 6th..
Pelosi and the rest belong in Gitmo and Trump belongs in the Whitehouse.
Meanwhile to continue the charade of White Supremacists taking over the government, Madame Pelosi has created "Fort Pelosi" formerly called the Capitol Hill.
It's no secret that Pelosi is guilty of refusing to authorizeaddition security. She wanted to make Trump look bad and resposnible for the false flag operation she was well aware was to occur.
The real question is when did she begin coordinating with antifa/blm terrorists to incite the breach? Because she obviously did.
She knew what was coming and made sure there was no security by refusing the National Guard and delaying reenforcements to the few she allowed for security duty.
Pelosi has a lot to answer for, including the deaths of innocent people..
 

BasicHumanUnit

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2013
Messages
16,698
Reaction score
11,098
Points
1,255
Location
Everywhere needed
You are correct....she and all top Dems knew the Capital event was going to occur.

It had to, in order to lock down the Capital to make it look like no one attended Biden's inauguration because of it when in fact, Biden never got
the votes they claim he did and no one was going to attend the inauguration anyway.

It HAD to be covered up.
 

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
3,309
Reaction score
5,329
Points
1,940
 

edthecynic

Censored for Cynicism
Joined
Oct 20, 2008
Messages
41,424
Reaction score
6,003
Points
1,830
Pelosi Exposed:
House Sergeant at Arms Accused of ‘Covering for Her’ on Capitol Riots Security
Pelosi Exposed: House Sergeant at Arms Accused of 'Covering for Her' on Capitol Riots Security - Becker News
28 Feb 2021 ~~ By Kyle Becker

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has carefully tried to stage-manage the fallout of the Capitol riots. She has proposed a 9/11-style commission, headed by a blatantly partisan general, in order to purportedly get to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th.
The decision came on the same day she was served notice by high-ranking Republicans that she herself has many serious questions to answer regarding the Capitol attacks.
The questions include what she knew about reports of a planned attack on the Capitol building; why security requests from the former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was turned down by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms six times; and why the Capitol security was so woeful that police officers even held the doors open for rioters and gawked as unarmed miscreants took over the Senate chamber.
Speaker Pelosi is now being accused of having weakened security before and during the Capitol riots due to “optics.” A report from the Daily Caller citing multiple anonymous sources say the former House Sergeant at Arms is “covering for her.”
The Daily Caller provides a timeline that exposes the problematic timing of Irving reportedly being contacted on the request.
The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 p.m, according to CNN. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.​
“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request?” one of the sources told the Daily Caller.
~Snip~
Earlier, on June 2, 2020, Pelosi called Trump a “fanner of the flames” after police had cleared protesters from outside the White House a day before.



Comment:
The Sunday Evening 'Fake' news will be filled with the latest “lies Trump spoke about” today at the CPAC
The Quisling Media will gleefully focus on the evil Trump who is out of office over the corruption of Washington D.C politicians whose machinations are destroying the foundations of the USA.
Obviously, the breach of the Capital was perpetrated by anti-Trump politicians funding Antifa to produce a false flag operation on january 6th..
Pelosi and the rest belong in Gitmo and Trump belongs in the Whitehouse.
Meanwhile to continue the charade of White Supremacists taking over the government, Madame Pelosi has created "Fort Pelosi" formerly called the Capitol Hill.
It's no secret that Pelosi is guilty of refusing to authorizeaddition security. She wanted to make Trump look bad and resposnible for the false flag operation she was well aware was to occur.
The real question is when did she begin coordinating with antifa/blm terrorists to incite the breach? Because she obviously did.
She knew what was coming and made sure there was no security by refusing the National Guard and delaying reenforcements to the few she allowed for security duty.
Pelosi has a lot to answer for, including the deaths of innocent people..

FAKE NEWS!
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
14,181
Reaction score
5,848
Points
390
How many Congressional Reps were in their offices or otherwise in “danger” at the time of the attacks? Why are their videos of police opening the gates and directing the protestors to the doors to the Capitol? With all of the “warnings” from Democrats, the Media, and DC Mayor Bowser for people NOT to come into DC because of the protests, why weren’t there law enforcement supplements from DC Gov and regional jurisdictions to back up and reinforce US Capitol Police? Why and Who denied the National Guard?

Nan wants a 1/6 Commission, bring it on. Let’s have it.
 

MeBelle

MeBelle 4 Prez 2024
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
20,469
Reaction score
9,891
Points
930
Pelosi Exposed:
House Sergeant at Arms Accused of ‘Covering for Her’ on Capitol Riots Security
Pelosi Exposed: House Sergeant at Arms Accused of 'Covering for Her' on Capitol Riots Security - Becker News
28 Feb 2021 ~~ By Kyle Becker

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has carefully tried to stage-manage the fallout of the Capitol riots. She has proposed a 9/11-style commission, headed by a blatantly partisan general, in order to purportedly get to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th.
The decision came on the same day she was served notice by high-ranking Republicans that she herself has many serious questions to answer regarding the Capitol attacks.
The questions include what she knew about reports of a planned attack on the Capitol building; why security requests from the former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was turned down by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms six times; and why the Capitol security was so woeful that police officers even held the doors open for rioters and gawked as unarmed miscreants took over the Senate chamber.
Speaker Pelosi is now being accused of having weakened security before and during the Capitol riots due to “optics.” A report from the Daily Caller citing multiple anonymous sources say the former House Sergeant at Arms is “covering for her.”
The Daily Caller provides a timeline that exposes the problematic timing of Irving reportedly being contacted on the request.
The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 p.m, according to CNN. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.​
“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request?” one of the sources told the Daily Caller.
~Snip~
Earlier, on June 2, 2020, Pelosi called Trump a “fanner of the flames” after police had cleared protesters from outside the White House a day before.



Comment:
The Sunday Evening 'Fake' news will be filled with the latest “lies Trump spoke about” today at the CPAC
The Quisling Media will gleefully focus on the evil Trump who is out of office over the corruption of Washington D.C politicians whose machinations are destroying the foundations of the USA.
Obviously, the breach of the Capital was perpetrated by anti-Trump politicians funding Antifa to produce a false flag operation on january 6th..
Pelosi and the rest belong in Gitmo and Trump belongs in the Whitehouse.
Meanwhile to continue the charade of White Supremacists taking over the government, Madame Pelosi has created "Fort Pelosi" formerly called the Capitol Hill.
It's no secret that Pelosi is guilty of refusing to authorizeaddition security. She wanted to make Trump look bad and resposnible for the false flag operation she was well aware was to occur.
The real question is when did she begin coordinating with antifa/blm terrorists to incite the breach? Because she obviously did.
She knew what was coming and made sure there was no security by refusing the National Guard and delaying reenforcements to the few she allowed for security duty.
Pelosi has a lot to answer for, including the deaths of innocent people..
FAKE NEWS!

lmao


prove it
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
160,613
Reaction score
23,306
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri
You are correct....she and all top Dems knew the Capital event was going to occur.

It had to, in order to lock down the Capital to make it look like no one attended Biden's inauguration because of it when in fact, Biden never got
the votes they claim he did and no one was going to attend the inauguration anyway.

It HAD to be covered up.
Trump knew it also and still had his rally and still told them to march on the capitol building.
 

jbrownson0831

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
7,708
Reaction score
5,975
Points
1,908
Pelosi Exposed:
House Sergeant at Arms Accused of ‘Covering for Her’ on Capitol Riots Security
Pelosi Exposed: House Sergeant at Arms Accused of 'Covering for Her' on Capitol Riots Security - Becker News
28 Feb 2021 ~~ By Kyle Becker

Speaker Nancy Pelosi has carefully tried to stage-manage the fallout of the Capitol riots. She has proposed a 9/11-style commission, headed by a blatantly partisan general, in order to purportedly get to the bottom of what really happened on January 6th.
The decision came on the same day she was served notice by high-ranking Republicans that she herself has many serious questions to answer regarding the Capitol attacks.
The questions include what she knew about reports of a planned attack on the Capitol building; why security requests from the former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund was turned down by the House and Senate Sergeant at Arms six times; and why the Capitol security was so woeful that police officers even held the doors open for rioters and gawked as unarmed miscreants took over the Senate chamber.
Speaker Pelosi is now being accused of having weakened security before and during the Capitol riots due to “optics.” A report from the Daily Caller citing multiple anonymous sources say the former House Sergeant at Arms is “covering for her.”
The Daily Caller provides a timeline that exposes the problematic timing of Irving reportedly being contacted on the request.
The New York Times previously reported that the Speaker’s office confirmed that the National Guard was approved around 1:43 pm. Sund said he sent a request for help from the National Guard to Irving around 1:09 p.m, according to CNN. Irving said he was contacted about the matter after 2:00 pm, Axios reported. Sources questioned how Irving got the request after 2 pm but Pelosi approved the request at 1:43 pm.​
“If you believe Irving’s timeline that he testified under oath to, how could he ask for permission from the Speaker 20 minutes before he got the request?” one of the sources told the Daily Caller.
~Snip~
Earlier, on June 2, 2020, Pelosi called Trump a “fanner of the flames” after police had cleared protesters from outside the White House a day before.



Comment:
The Sunday Evening 'Fake' news will be filled with the latest “lies Trump spoke about” today at the CPAC
The Quisling Media will gleefully focus on the evil Trump who is out of office over the corruption of Washington D.C politicians whose machinations are destroying the foundations of the USA.
Obviously, the breach of the Capital was perpetrated by anti-Trump politicians funding Antifa to produce a false flag operation on january 6th..
Pelosi and the rest belong in Gitmo and Trump belongs in the Whitehouse.
Meanwhile to continue the charade of White Supremacists taking over the government, Madame Pelosi has created "Fort Pelosi" formerly called the Capitol Hill.
It's no secret that Pelosi is guilty of refusing to authorizeaddition security. She wanted to make Trump look bad and resposnible for the false flag operation she was well aware was to occur.
The real question is when did she begin coordinating with antifa/blm terrorists to incite the breach? Because she obviously did.
She knew what was coming and made sure there was no security by refusing the National Guard and delaying reenforcements to the few she allowed for security duty.
Pelosi has a lot to answer for, including the deaths of innocent people..
FAKE NEWS!
Wacko liberal!
 

Moonglow

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
160,613
Reaction score
23,306
Points
2,220
Location
sw mizzouri

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
70,564
Reaction score
18,369
Points
2,290
Why didn't he have them deployed if he just happened to have had them?
It's not legal unless Trump enacted the Insurection Act. Even then it comes with a lot of disqualifications and restrictions. A city or state needs to make an official request for government assistance in military matters, or they must give written permission for the President when he makes an offer.
 

Aletheia4u

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
6,704
Reaction score
1,115
Points
195
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top