Pelosi Encourages Protesters’ ‘Righteous Anger’ in Marching Illegally in Front of Justices’ Homes

[j-mac]

Well you get right on that, Freaky. Let us know how it works out for you.
So far, no violence. Just protest. I don't see any protection for the hundreds of
election officials and school board members across the country who've had to
endure ACTUAL threats of violence at the hand of you just and righteous, "Warriors
for God".

18USCode1503 dumbass.

 

[struth]

I'm still waiting this morning for those examples of violence.

Geez man...get out from under that dembot misinformation bubble....
LA abortion rights protest turns violent

Live updates | LA abortion rights protest turns violent

A Los Angeles protest over the leaked U.S. Supreme Court draft opinion that would throw out Roe v. Wade briefly turned into a skirmish with police, who say one officer was injured.

www.mercurynews.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Geez man...get out from under that dembot misinformation bubble....
LA abortion rights protest turns violent

Live updates | LA abortion rights protest turns violent

A Los Angeles protest over the leaked U.S. Supreme Court draft opinion that would throw out Roe v. Wade briefly turned into a skirmish with police, who say one officer was injured.

www.mercurynews.com

Was this in front of a SC Justice house?....no? Then this DOESN'T apply.
That is what the thread is about.

Hint..I knew EXACTLY the example you were going to post.
Nice try.

 

[struth]

Was this in front of a SC Justice house?....no? Then this DOESN'T apply.
That is what the thread is about.

Hint..I knew EXACTLY the example you were going to post.
Nice try.

hahaha here's another example of your demafascist insurrections committing acts of violence: Leftist Insurrectionists Respond to Supreme Court Roe Memo by Burning Police Cars and Attacking Officers - No Debate Allowed

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

hahaha here's another example of your demafascist insurrections committing acts of violence: Leftist Insurrectionists Respond to Supreme Court Roe Memo by Burning Police Cars and Attacking Officers - No Debate Allowed

And...another deflection from the thread topic. Don't know why I expected anything different.

Look. Let's just be honest. You righties began this fight. You shouldn't be surprised when the tactics you've been using for years..are finally employed against you. ^Shrug^.

 

[struth]

And...another deflection from the thread topic. Don't know why I expected anything different.

Look. Let's just be honest. You righties began this fight. You shouldn't be surprised when the tactics you've been using for years..are finally employed against you. ^Shrug^.

The thread is about how the Demafascist brownshirts continue their insurrectionist tactics.

No violence is actually needed for what the Demafascist brownshirts are doing at the Justices house....threatening a justice like that in and of itself is a crime....it appears you, Nancy P and the rest of the Demafacisit leadership is aiding and abetting in that crime....you all should be held accountable.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The thread is about how the Demafascist brownshirts continue their insurrectionist tactics.

No violence is actually needed for what the Demafascist brownshirts are doing at the Justices house....threatening a justice like that in and of itself is a crime....it appears you, Nancy P and the rest of the Demafacisit leadership is aiding and abetting in that crime....you all should be held accountable.

Reading comprehension class is in order for you. There were no threats made or violence done in front of justice's homes.

Your tactics are being used against you.

Why are you surprised?

 

[DBA]

And...another deflection from the thread topic. Don't know why I expected anything different.

Look. Let's just be honest. You righties began this fight. You shouldn't be surprised when the tactics you've been using for years..are finally employed against you. ^Shrug^.

How did righties start this fight? Seems to me Roe v Wade started this fight. It was a horribly flawed decisions that has wrongly stood for decades. Yeah, it is time to turn this over to the states where it belongs.

 

[struth]

Reading comprehension class is in order for you. There were no threats made or violence done in front of justice's homes.

Your tactics are being used against you.

Why are you surprised?

hahaha yeah being outside of their house is a threat. Violence isn't a required element of the crime. Additionally, it is getting close to obstruction of justice.

Threatening a judges family is also a crime....

Threatening government officials of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

When a threat is made against a judge, it can be considered obstruction of justice.[3] Threatening federal officials' family members is also a federal crime; in enacting the law, the Committee on the Judiciary stated that "Clearly it is a proper Federal function to respond to terrorists and other criminals who seek to influence the making of Federal policies and interfere with the administration of justice by attacking close relatives of those entrusted with these tasks."[4]

 

[DBA]

Reading comprehension class is in order for you. There were no threats made or violence done in front of justice's homes.

Your tactics are being used against you.

Why are you surprised?

Their mere presence of protesters at the private homes of judges is a violation. They are atttempting to intimidate or at the very least influence a judge to rule a certain way on a case. It is implied by these protests that if Roe v Wade is overturned, there will be violent consequences for some of these judges. This is a horrible precedent to set for future cases.

Lucky for Democrats, Garland is much more concerned with white supremacy or parents with school aged children to worry about this serious long-term threat to the future efficacy of the Supreme Court.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Left need riots and wars to divert attention from their epic failures. Brandon and Pelosi continue to toss gasoline.

“While we have seen and heard extraordinary anguish in our communities,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said, “we have been moved by how so many have channeled their righteous anger into meaningful action: planning to march and mobilize to make their voices heard.”

In the statement, Pelosi also attacked Republicans and the Supreme Court over the expected ruling, and says that Democrats will “fight relentlessly to enshrine Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.”

Pelosi Encourages Protesters' 'Righteous Anger' in Marching Illegally in Front of Justices' Homes

pjmedia.com

Why need a Congress that does next to nothing for the next 5 to 10 years. We have so much untangling, unwinding and dialing back to do.

They need no staffing

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

hahaha yeah being outside of their house is a threat. Violence isn't a required element of the crime. Additionally, it is getting close to obstruction of justice.

Threatening a judges family is also a crime....

Threatening government officials of the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

When a threat is made against a judge, it can be considered obstruction of justice.[3] Threatening federal officials' family members is also a federal crime; in enacting the law, the Committee on the Judiciary stated that "Clearly it is a proper Federal function to respond to terrorists and other criminals who seek to influence the making of Federal policies and interfere with the administration of justice by attacking close relatives of those entrusted with these tasks."[4]

The same threat an angry, armed right wing mob is allowed to do outside of a common school board or election officials home...with NO repercussions whatsoever.
Again, you have yet to present ANY evidence of violence either stated or carried out on a SC judge's property..because there have been none.

Sorry, that street, runs both ways.

 

[struth]

The same threat an angry, armed right wing mob is allowed to do outside of a common school board or election officials home...with NO repercussions whatsoever.
Again, you have yet to present ANY evidence of violence either stated or carried out on a SC judge's property..because there have been none.

Sorry, that street, runs both ways.

school boards officials aren’t judges or federal employees…thus the law i provided doesn’t apply.

besides xiden called them domestic terrorist…so since you’re comparing them i am glad your acknowledging your demafasict are domestic terrorist.

violence is not necessary…the threat is.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

school boards officials aren’t judges or federal employees…thus the law i provided doesn’t apply.

besides xiden called them domestic terrorist…so since you’re comparing them i am glad your acknowledging your demafasict are domestic terrorist.

violence is not necessary…the threat is.

Same principle applies..whether you like it or not. You can't have it both ways.
You shouldn't be surprised when the tactics you invented and deployed..are used against you.

So far, no one has committed any violent act, brandished a firearm, pounded on any doors, or stood up with a bullhorn and made a threat to a judge or their family in front of their house.
The same cannot be said of school board and election officials.

 

[struth]

Same principle applies..whether you like it or not. You can't have it both ways.
You shouldn't be surprised when the tactics you invented and deployed..are used against you.

So far, no one has committed any violent act, brandished a firearm, pounded on any doors, or stood up with a bullhorn and made a threat to a judge or their family in front of their house.
The same cannot be said of school board and election officials.

no they don’t. there is a federal law that deals with judges

there is no law about school board members that aren’t covered by it

try again insurrectionist

 

[hadit]

The Left need riots and wars to divert attention from their epic failures. Brandon and Pelosi continue to toss gasoline.

“While we have seen and heard extraordinary anguish in our communities,” Pelosi, D-Calif., said, “we have been moved by how so many have channeled their righteous anger into meaningful action: planning to march and mobilize to make their voices heard.”

In the statement, Pelosi also attacked Republicans and the Supreme Court over the expected ruling, and says that Democrats will “fight relentlessly to enshrine Roe v. Wade as the law of the land.”

Pelosi Encourages Protesters' 'Righteous Anger' in Marching Illegally in Front of Justices' Homes

pjmedia.com

Somebody needs to remind Pelosi that she can write that law herself, right now, and likely get it passed by both House and Senate and get Quid Pro to sign it before the election. The fact that she's not even talking about doing that tells me this is far more important to them as a campaign issue than anything else.

 

[hadit]

While I do not agree with protesting at private homes, if are conservative, you should be for Roe Vs Wade, since it keeps government intrusion into our personal lives, to a reduced level.
Government has no authority to get involved with personal medical choices like abortion.

Or vaccinations?

 

[BlindBoo]

18USCode1503 dumbass.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

[Flopper]

Yes, 60% are in favor of abortion.

FIRST TRIMESTER ABORTIONS.

You know, that Mississippi law that limits abortions to first trimester that Leftards claim is an attack on womens rights?

2nd trimester only 40% support
3rd only 20% support.

It’s why Democrats won’t get Pelosi sending a bill legalizing abortion to Biden’s desk. It’s a loser.

It's just a political maneuver to get republican congressmen on record as being against Rowe. Even if it passed congress, the courts would strike it down assuming the Supreme Court overturns it.

 

[Weatherman2020]

It's just a political maneuver to get republican congressmen on record as being against Rowe. Even if it passed congress, the courts would strike it down assuming the Supreme Court overturns it.

Democrats are smart in not putting it writing they want to rip the limbs off of babies being born. Everything beyond 15 weeks is despised by Americans.