Pedophilia or Just Porn?

GQ is a magazine for men.

The women from the show posing are in their 20's, not teens.

They could have said no, but the exposure can only help their career (I'm sure they think that)

Not many kids read GQ, but yes, these pics can be seen on the net anyway. Oh well, it's not like they are Hannah Montana posing topless on the cover of a magazine!

GLEE is on FOX network, what did you expect? :lol:

Do you think showing your bod helps in the long run? Are there any pics of you lying somewhere?
 
Last edited:
Its was a body fragrance called loves baby soft. There was a spritz and body splash. It sorta smelled like baby powder. Most defiantly NOT a product for babies. The ad was aimed at women.
Why would I want my woman to smell like a baby's ass?

Good question. I prefer her to smell like caramel or chocolate syrup...............:eusa_whistle:

Anyone who says they want to cover you in caramel and chocolate and lick you clean has never done it - before they get to anything interesting, you are asleep and your partner is in a diabetic coma.*









* I wish I could take credit for that quote, but I heard it on Comedy Central.
 
36467949.gif


Brooke Shields was 15 when this ad was run. Calvin Klein is certainly not the only advertiser to use underage models in sexualized poses, but the company is among the most notorious for it.

Calvin Klein: A Case Study | Handout

The ads are not illegal, but nonetheless I found them disturbing.

(Just in case anyone wants to continue this convo.)
 
36467949.gif


Brooke Shields was 15 when this ad was run. Calvin Klein is certainly not the only advertiser to use underage models in sexualized poses, but the company is among the most notorious for it.

Calvin Klein: A Case Study | Handout

The ads are not illegal, but nonetheless I found them disturbing.

(Just in case anyone wants to continue this convo.)

At 15, Brook's mother was the ultimate deciding factor in this.
 
36467949.gif


Brooke Shields was 15 when this ad was run. Calvin Klein is certainly not the only advertiser to use underage models in sexualized poses, but the company is among the most notorious for it.

Calvin Klein: A Case Study | Handout

The ads are not illegal, but nonetheless I found them disturbing.

(Just in case anyone wants to continue this convo.)

At 15, Brook's mother was the ultimate deciding factor in this.

I did not say I thought such ads should be illegal, Zoom-boing. IMO, there'd be a ginormous difficulty in trying to classify images of children as sexual vs. nonsexual. My point is, such ads put all girls at risk as they send the message a minor has a burgeoning sexual appetite.

I actually had a babygirl of my own when this ad ran; trust me, it did absolutely no good for young girls.
 
36467949.gif


Brooke Shields was 15 when this ad was run. Calvin Klein is certainly not the only advertiser to use underage models in sexualized poses, but the company is among the most notorious for it.

Calvin Klein: A Case Study | Handout

The ads are not illegal, but nonetheless I found them disturbing.

(Just in case anyone wants to continue this convo.)

At 15, Brook's mother was the ultimate deciding factor in this.

I did not say I thought such ads should be illegal, Zoom-boing. IMO, there'd be a ginormous difficulty in trying to classify images of children as sexual vs. nonsexual. My point is, such ads put all girls at risk as they send the message a minor has a burgeoning sexual appetite.

I actually had a babygirl of my own when this ad ran; trust me, it did absolutely no good for young girls.

The caveman used the same ad to get fire from the other clans
 
Three actresses, all in their 20's, who portray high school students on the television show "Glee" have done a highly sexualized photo shoot for GQ@ magazine that has parents in an uproar.

getimage.aspx


If these actress and the magazine had not been trading on the "Glee" story line, I'd have no problem. But given the images....yes, this is further pop culture sexualization of minor girls and it was over the line.

Shame on GQ@, these actresses and the "Glee" show for this series of photos.

What say you?


Parents Group Rips 'Pedophile' Glee Shots - 'They're old enough to do what they want,' says GQ editor

I'd say that few men on America don't have fond fantasies of the girls who got away in HS.

Stuff like above merely stokes that forbidden (to adult men, at least) fire.

Pedophilia is attraction to children, not High School girls.

If attraction to HS girls was pedophilia, then every healthy heterosexual young HS boy in America is a pedophile.

Now does that really make sense?

Let's call that attraction what it really is shall we?

It's the norm, not a deviation from it.

It is still perfectly reasonable that we have laws against against having sex with teenagers.

But let's not kids ourselves that teenagers (male or female) are CHILDREN.

We all went though high school and we ought to know better than that.
 
They're wearing more close than some wear in public, some people will make a mountian out of a mole hill just to be in the spotlight
 
Now the pedofreaks can quit watching those Brady Bunch re-runs.

The real sickos were those who were fantazing about Alice the housekeeper.

16976.gif

I confess that I sometimes fantaize about having her, too.

Oh, god GOD no! Not for that!!!

I could really use a good house keeper, though.



 
Now the pedofreaks can quit watching those Brady Bunch re-runs.

The real sickos were those who were fantazing about Alice the housekeeper.

16976.gif

I confess that I sometimes fantaize about having her, too.

Oh, god GOD no! Not for that!!!

I could really use a good house keeper, though.




Ah Alice. It's many a pleasant memory when I had various girlfriends put on a red wig and blue maid's uniform.

Which is probably why I've gone through so many girlfriends..:eusa_eh:
 
If there's no penetration, then it's not porn, it's erotica.

If they're over the age of 18 (regardless of the character they play), it's not pedophilia.

Besides, doesn't Playboy and Penthouse do photo shoots of college age girls in locker rooms and hallways? They call their shoots "Girls of the Big 5" and shit like that.

Nope. No porn, just erotica that was badly thought out.

:eusa_think:

I would consider a picture of a girl's nipple getting tongued to be porn, even though there's no penetration.



The pictures are obviously neither pedophilia nor porn.

One mans porn is another mans art and third mans trash. It is all a matter of opinion... and that's what puts a subject into the realm of 'politics'.

Opinions are like faces and fannys - everyone has one and no two are precisely alike.

Reminds me of that one Supreme Court opinion where the Justice wrote something like "I can't define pornography, but I know it when I see it".
 
You know........most of the heterosexual porn today is older men having sex with barely legal teens.

In that case, you could infer that heterosexuality causes pedophilia.
 
I'm with you Madeline insofar as I think the photos are inappropriate. Glee is one of my favorite shows and aside from the "girl on girl action" last week, I think it's a great show for the whole family. These young ladies are not famous for their modeling skills. They are not even pretty. They are profiting from their fame on a family show and I see that as sleazy and opportunist.

As Spiderman says "With great power, comes great responsiblity". You can't tell me they need the cash.

Not even pretty? :eek: Someone needs to do a poll. I think you would find that about 99.0% of the men here would disagree with you.
she has no hips. might as well be a boy.

Here you go. I passed on this. It's all yours.

View attachment 11809
 

Forum List

Back
Top