- Thread starter
- #21
Tell that to Putin.Of course..the marginalization of the Alt/right. It's a shame..on some levels...that they cannot moderate their sites a bit better, and avoid this altogether. However, Parlor is not the only venue the right has. I would point to this site..for example. I think it is the fact that the fringies hate moderation--that drives them to questionable hosts.I bet that with a little more push that you could keep anyone from going over to Parler to read anything or have any contact with anyone from the right wing. How insulating. I mean add Russia, paint them as Red, compare them to Al Queda...................How odd...that a site that purports to be all about patriotism is going to be a client of a Russian company that has been linked to social media disinformation attacks in the US?
On Monday, Parler's website was reachable again, though only with a message from its chief executive saying he was working to restore functionality.
The internet protocol address it used is owned by DDos-Guard, which is controlled by two Russian men and provides services including protection from distributed denial of service attacks, infrastructure expert Ronald Guilmette told Reuters.
If the website is fully restored, Parler users would be able to see and post comments. Most users prefer the app, however, which remains banned from the official Apple Inc and Google stores.
Parler CEO John Matze and representatives of DDoS-Guard did not reply to requests for comment.
Last Wednesday, Matze told Reuters the company was in talks with multiple service providers but declined to elaborate.
DDoS-Guard has worked with other racist, rightist and conspiracy sites that have been used by mass murderers to share messages, including 8kun. It has also supported Russian government sites.
DDoS-Guard's website lists an address in Scotland under the company name Cognitive Cloud LP, but that is owned by two men in Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Guilmette said. One of them told the Guardian recently that he was not aware of all of the content the company facilitates.
Parler critics said it was a potential security risk for it to depend on a Russian company, as well as an odd choice for a site popular with self-described patriots.
Do you not see a trend here?
I would point out that Parlor added the Russian element all on their own. Russia's motives and actions are well known and documented.
A country that literally poisons its dissenters does deserve a raised eyebrow or two, yes?
A country that bans free speech for partisan reasons, deserves a revolution.