I'm just shocked that these MAGArats are denizens of that shit pit. Ya know...the forum where the Capitol attack was planned?AOL seems to confirm the above but their site seems already swamped. DOS attack already?
Parler website comes back online with ‘lovers and haters’ note
“Now seems like the right time to remind you all — both lovers and haters — why we started this platform,” the message reads. Parler, which refers to itself as a “free speech” alternative to Twitter, was booted out of the Apple App Store and the Google Play store and kicked off of Amazon Web...www.aol.com
I was thinking more, Grand Dragon.
Da, Comrade.For those of you interested in joining Parler.
Parler website appears to be back online and promises to 'resolve any challenge before us'
Parler has faced massive fallout the siege on the US Capitol, with various business partners cutting ties. It was booted from Amazon Web Services last week.www.businessinsider.in
Yes. Trump could have done something. But he was busy fighting COVID while the filthy Dems were impeaching him for a Phone call.
Well, actually, that's nonsense. It was Republicans who fought for Section 230, which affords website publishers the status of non-publishers in terms of general immunity regarding third-party content. The idea was to promote the entrepreneurial spirit and protect free speech. For a while there it was working just fine. But, of course, Democrats eschew its enforcement as the prevailing big tech oligopoly serves them; more at, the latter is in league with them, ideologically. But, then, the lack of enforcement also serves the economic interests of the oligopoly by stifling competition.
Trump's mistake was to rely on Congress to enforce the provision. The executive branch enforces the law. He should have invoked antitrust law when it became abundantly clear just a few years ago that this oligopoly had no intention of honoring the terms of the provision, particularly regarding the free speech of conservatives, whose reasoned opinions of common sense and decency had come to dominate interactive social media. Now those voices are being systematically deplatformed/demonetized. But, then, leftists have always employed various mechanisms to stifle the free exchange of ideas as the madness of their ideas cannot withstand the cultural dynamics of competition. Their ideas are batshit crazy, and the stuff of obedience and conformity.
The senate had acquitted Trump prior to covid starting.Yes. Trump could have done something. But he was busy fighting COVID while the filthy Dems were impeaching him for a Phone call.
Well, actually, that's nonsense. It was Republicans who fought for Section 230, which affords website publishers the status of non-publishers in terms of general immunity regarding third-party content. The idea was to promote the entrepreneurial spirit and protect free speech. For a while there it was working just fine. But, of course, Democrats eschew its enforcement as the prevailing big tech oligopoly serves them; more at, the latter is in league with them, ideologically. But, then, the lack of enforcement also serves the economic interests of the oligopoly by stifling competition.
Trump's mistake was to rely on Congress to enforce the provision. The executive branch enforces the law. He should have invoked antitrust law when it became abundantly clear just a few years ago that this oligopoly had no intention of honoring the terms of the provision, particularly regarding the free speech of conservatives, whose reasoned opinions of common sense and decency had come to dominate interactive social media. Now those voices are being systematically deplatformed/demonetized. But, then, leftists have always employed various mechanisms to stifle the free exchange of ideas as the madness of their ideas cannot withstand the cultural dynamics of competition. Their ideas are batshit crazy, and the stuff of obedience and conformity.
Well, see, that's the problem. You thought wrong.
Thank you~I'm hoping Americans will put out the fires of anger and live for the good of neighbors.
Well, see, that's the problem. You thought wrong.
Bullshit. Travel ban on China? January 30. Besides ,the filthy Dems did nothing. Except try to back stab the President. Democrats are traitors.The senate had acquitted Trump prior to covid starting.Yes. Trump could have done something. But he was busy fighting COVID while the filthy Dems were impeaching him for a Phone call.
Well, actually, that's nonsense. It was Republicans who fought for Section 230, which affords website publishers the status of non-publishers in terms of general immunity regarding third-party content. The idea was to promote the entrepreneurial spirit and protect free speech. For a while there it was working just fine. But, of course, Democrats eschew its enforcement as the prevailing big tech oligopoly serves them; more at, the latter is in league with them, ideologically. But, then, the lack of enforcement also serves the economic interests of the oligopoly by stifling competition.
Trump's mistake was to rely on Congress to enforce the provision. The executive branch enforces the law. He should have invoked antitrust law when it became abundantly clear just a few years ago that this oligopoly had no intention of honoring the terms of the provision, particularly regarding the free speech of conservatives, whose reasoned opinions of common sense and decency had come to dominate interactive social media. Now those voices are being systematically deplatformed/demonetized. But, then, leftists have always employed various mechanisms to stifle the free exchange of ideas as the madness of their ideas cannot withstand the cultural dynamics of competition. Their ideas are batshit crazy, and the stuff of obedience and conformity.
Trump hadnt done anything with coronavirus prior to mid march anyways.
democratic led states listened to those who know how viruses spread, scientists.Bullshit. Travel ban on China? January 30. Besides ,the filthy Dems did nothing. Except try to back stab the President. Democrats are traitors.The senate had acquitted Trump prior to covid starting.Yes. Trump could have done something. But he was busy fighting COVID while the filthy Dems were impeaching him for a Phone call.
Well, actually, that's nonsense. It was Republicans who fought for Section 230, which affords website publishers the status of non-publishers in terms of general immunity regarding third-party content. The idea was to promote the entrepreneurial spirit and protect free speech. For a while there it was working just fine. But, of course, Democrats eschew its enforcement as the prevailing big tech oligopoly serves them; more at, the latter is in league with them, ideologically. But, then, the lack of enforcement also serves the economic interests of the oligopoly by stifling competition.
Trump's mistake was to rely on Congress to enforce the provision. The executive branch enforces the law. He should have invoked antitrust law when it became abundantly clear just a few years ago that this oligopoly had no intention of honoring the terms of the provision, particularly regarding the free speech of conservatives, whose reasoned opinions of common sense and decency had come to dominate interactive social media. Now those voices are being systematically deplatformed/demonetized. But, then, leftists have always employed various mechanisms to stifle the free exchange of ideas as the madness of their ideas cannot withstand the cultural dynamics of competition. Their ideas are batshit crazy, and the stuff of obedience and conformity.
Trump hadnt done anything with coronavirus prior to mid march anyways.
Well, see, that's the problem. You thought wrong.
Ah, that's too bad. I suspected as much. But, hey, take the advice I once gave to my retarded cousin: "Wilbur, just do the best you can with what God gave you."
but you LIED and said he did nothing. What would the dirty Democrats have done? BIDEN said the China ban was "Racist". So THAt action would not have happened. Nobody KNEW how nasty this virus was until MARCH. So I am sure the filthy Dems would have done no better. Besides ,Democrats don't want to SOLVE any crisis. They just want them to exist so they can take advantage. Nature of the Beast.democratic led states listened to those who know how viruses spread, scientists.Bullshit. Travel ban on China? January 30. Besides ,the filthy Dems did nothing. Except try to back stab the President. Democrats are traitors.The senate had acquitted Trump prior to covid starting.Yes. Trump could have done something. But he was busy fighting COVID while the filthy Dems were impeaching him for a Phone call.
Well, actually, that's nonsense. It was Republicans who fought for Section 230, which affords website publishers the status of non-publishers in terms of general immunity regarding third-party content. The idea was to promote the entrepreneurial spirit and protect free speech. For a while there it was working just fine. But, of course, Democrats eschew its enforcement as the prevailing big tech oligopoly serves them; more at, the latter is in league with them, ideologically. But, then, the lack of enforcement also serves the economic interests of the oligopoly by stifling competition.
Trump's mistake was to rely on Congress to enforce the provision. The executive branch enforces the law. He should have invoked antitrust law when it became abundantly clear just a few years ago that this oligopoly had no intention of honoring the terms of the provision, particularly regarding the free speech of conservatives, whose reasoned opinions of common sense and decency had come to dominate interactive social media. Now those voices are being systematically deplatformed/demonetized. But, then, leftists have always employed various mechanisms to stifle the free exchange of ideas as the madness of their ideas cannot withstand the cultural dynamics of competition. Their ideas are batshit crazy, and the stuff of obedience and conformity.
Trump hadnt done anything with coronavirus prior to mid march anyways.
Nobody did anything to stop china travel ban, there were just some knee-jerk complaints due to the previous muslim bans.
