Paramount Agrees to pay Trump $16 million in CBS 60 Minutes lawsuit

[Foxfyre]

You cited no laws and no legal precedent.

I looked through every post you made in this thread.

Everything that CBS did was protected by the first amendment.

No you didn't. Have a lovely afternoon.

 

[WEATHER53]

Who defines what is “ethical”?

Not surprising you do not know

 

[Marener]

So all those CBS executives are pouring millions out even though they know Trump lied?
You spew out some real idiot shit ideas.

Of course they know Trump lied. They also know that Trump is a vindictive authoritarian thug who has the ability to exact revenge by misusing government authority against them.

 

[WEATHER53]

No, the transcript, and videos show he was right

paramount and a court agreed

Paramount decision to pay now means they feared it would get worse

 

[struth]

Paramount decision to pay now means they feared it would get worse

Correct

 

[WEATHER53]

Correct

Moroner but but time

 

[WEATHER53]

Of course they know Trump lied. They also know that Trump is a vindictive authoritarian thug who has the ability to exact revenge by misusing government authority against them.

Return to the coloring book as adult thinkers are participating

 

[Marener]

Return to the coloring book as adult thinkers are participating

There’s no adult thinking on your side here. You are all just a bunch of followers in the cult of Trump who will do anything to rationalize his abhorrent behavior.

This lawsuit is complete bullshit.

 

[Marener]

Paramount decision to pay now means they feared it would get worse

Yes. It would get worse if Trump successfully gets the FCC to hold up their merger deal and cost them far more money than the $16 million they give up now.

 

[struth]

Yes. It would get worse if Trump successfully gets the FCC to hold up their merger deal and cost them far more money than the $16 million they give up now.

The SEC already approved in Feb. same with the Europeans.

Certainly, it was delayed and likely could have been done last year had 60 Mins not engaged in news distortion but that case is completely seperate from this personal lawsuit

 

[DonGlock26]

See post 33.

Trump is a hypocrite.

I'm sure you will learn to live with that, as always.

As long as the CBS check cashes. Winning.

 

[DonGlock26]

Paramount, Parent Company of CBS, Settles Trump Lawsuit for $16 Million - The Last Refuge

President Trump sued CBS for manipulating the video interview of Kamala Harris to fabricate a response and assist the Harris campaign in 2024. CBS didn’t just shape or modify the interview; they literally moved answers to questions. A Twitter user named @Mazemore was the first to notice one big...

theconservativetreehouse.com

 

[JoeB131]

First one I found.

Uncut ‘60 Minutes’ Kamala Harris interview reveals ‘word salad’ responses were heavily edited by CBS — snipped Israel answer to just 20 words

Wow the New York Post...

No credibility.

 

[Marener]

Wow the New York Post...

No credibility.

They probably think the NY Post is left wing because it’s from New York and everything there is obviously a democrat.

 

[struth]

They probably think the NY Post is left wing because it’s from New York and everything there is obviously a democrat.

Not everyone. There are a few Americans still left there

 

[struth]

Wow the New York Post...

No credibility.

They didn’t have to settle a lawsuit for distorting the news.

In fact they were right on the xiden laptop

 

[Rambunctious]

There’s no difference when it comes to the first amendment.

People who work for private sector companies who say stupid things can get the company sued... it happens all the time... there are no special rules for reporters...

 

[Marener]

People who work for private sector companies who say stupid things can get the company sued... it happens all the time... there are no special rules for reporters...

Reporters don’t have any additional rules they need to follow either, which is contrary to what you implied.

This lawsuit is bogus. It should have been immediately thrown out.

 

[struth]

People who work for private sector companies who say stupid things can get the company sued... it happens all the time... there are no special rules for reporters...

The issue is dembots think they are puff daddy and above the law

 

[struth]

Reporters don’t have any additional rules they need to follow either, which is contrary to what you implied.

This lawsuit is bogus. It should have been immediately thrown out.

Actually, reporters do have additional rules, unlike say someone on a message board or an opinion show they can not distort the news

The lawsuit was a massive success for the rule of law and a blow to demafasict