Panicked Democrats looking for who to blame for Kamala loss.

Either way I don't give a rat's ass if you think you're a hamster, it's still absurd.
I also don't care what you think. I am amused by what you can or can't argue through rational arguments. Don't make claims your intellect can't support. :itsok: :lmao:
 
Some want to blame the feckless campaign of Kamala.

Some want to blame Biden.

Some want to blame the way the system was rigged to throw Biden out and install Harris, thereby disenfranchising 14 million voters.

I say all of the above.

While some Democrats say they are increasingly hopeful that Harris will win, others have expressed mounting frustration about a string of factors that have plagued the campaign from the outset.

Fingers are being pointed at Harris and her campaign when it comes to disappointment over her messaging, particularly on the economy.

But some Democrats have already looked to pin the blame on President Biden, who some think took too long to step aside.

“People are nervous and they’re trying to cover their ass and get a little ahead of Election Day,” one Democratic strategist said of the sniping. “It’s based on anxiety, stakes and the unique nature of this cycle.

“We didn’t have a traditional process for this election. We didn’t have a primary. People just had to fall in line,” the strategist added, saying “it’s not surprising to me” that some of the blame game is happening even before Election Day.

If Harris loses, “there will be a mad dash to assign blame,” the strategist added.


The Democrats just need to look in the mirror to find out who to blame for the Royal Schlonging that Trump gave Kamala.

Time for the party to move back toward the center, quit advocating for socialized medicine, price controls and free sex changes for prisoners and minors.

Take more of a neutral stance on controversial and divisive issues like Gay Marriage.
 
" Provisions Of Entitlement From Agreements For Civil Union "

* Recognizing Limits Of Distinction About An Individual *

Take more of a neutral stance on controversial and divisive issues like Gay Marriage.
The us republic is based on independence of the individual and a distinction between individuals for immutable characteristics such as sex or race of an individual is not allowable , thus provisions of entitlement for benefits allowable by law that result from a social civil contract - a civil union between two individuals to coalesce personal assets - cannot make a distinction between race or sex of the individual contract holders .

The government can always rescind provisions of entitlement for benefits allowable by law for all civil unions .

The government only includes provisions for a single monogamous civil unions and does not include provisions of entitlement for polygamy or polyandry or any form of commune other than as a corporation .
 
" Provisions Of Entitlement From Agreements For Civil Union "

* Recognizing Limits Of Distinction About An Individual *


The us republic is based on independence of the individual and a distinction between individuals for immutable characteristics such as sex or race of an individual is not allowable , thus provisions of entitlement for benefits allowable by law that result from a social civil contract - a civil union between two individuals to coalesce personal assets - cannot make a distinction between race or sex of the individual contract holders .

The government can always rescind provisions of entitlement for benefits allowable by law for all civil unions .

The government only includes provisions for a single monogamous civil unions and does not include provisions of entitlement for polygamy or polyandry or any form of commune other than as a corporation .


You don't get it. Most people in the US electorate are opposed to gay marriage and men violating each other's butt holes with impunity.

The D's need to back away from their insistence on normalizing the practice, if they hope to return to power.
 
" Us Republicanism Espouses Independence Of The Individual "

* Populism For Democracy As Tyranny By Collective Majority Is Democratism *

You don't get it. Most people in the US electorate are opposed to gay marriage and men violating each other's butt holes with impunity.
The D's need to back away from their insistence on normalizing the practice, if they hope to return to power.
The us republic is not founded on populism for democracy as tyranny by collective majority , rather us republic is founded upon independence of the individual and distinctions between individuals cannot occur based on immutable characteristics of race or sex .

Shoving shit in ones phallus is not wise even if it is a male in a female and hpv is known to cause colon and throat cancer .

The literal meaning of an after life has not changed , which is genetic continuance , and social civil contracts are made valid through informed consent .
 
So you can't. Just say so instead of pretending. It's just embarrassing. :lol:
Hey stupid, I never pretended i could explain reality to you.

Nobody could. That's how out of touch with it you are.
 
Hey stupid, I never pretended i could explain reality to you.

Nobody could. That's how out of touch with it you are.
How about just explaining it for the sake of your argument. You can hide behind me all you like, it doesn't make you any less of an incapable bitch. :lol:
 
Yup. I could buy and sell her two times over.
No you couldn't. You ain't got no money. You're low class poor white trash who whines about being passed over for blacks to have an excuse for your deficiencies. Because white women are the number one DEI recipient, so if you are being passed over for blacks you re obviusly a mental patient.
 
How about just explaining it for the sake of your argument. You can hide behind me all you like, it doesn't make you any less of an incapable bitch. :lol:
A Beta male says what?

Trans = Make Believe

Still don’t understand the equation? Moron
 
So much hate, racism and bigotry in this thread on all sides.
 
Back
Top Bottom