- Moderator
- #1
I agree with Office Depot terminating the employees who wouldn't print the fliers as they were not practicing the company's customer service values. However, as a private organization, Office Depot has the right to decide what or what not to print. The federal government does not have the authority to come in and force them to print anybody's media. They have the right to refuse service just like that Christian baker has the right not to make the gay wedding cake. For decades, conservatives have fought the left over this freedom and now Bondi is trying to roll back years of progress. This is authoritarianism.
“Businesses cannot discriminate,” Bondi said, referring to the Office Depot incident. “If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.”
“I have Harmeet Dhillon right now in our civil rights unit looking at that immediately, that Office Depot had done that,” Bondi added. “We’re looking it up.”
Private companies have a constitutional right to refuse service to anyone as long as it’s for non-discriminatory reasons. However, people are pointing to recent Supreme Court rulings that appear to contradict that statute.
In 2023, the Supreme Court sided with a Colorado Christian website designer who did not want to create a website for same-sex couples, despite the state’s anti-discrimination laws. The Supreme Court said the First Amendment protected the designer from creating websites she doesn’t believe in.
“Businesses cannot discriminate,” Bondi said, referring to the Office Depot incident. “If you wanna go in and print posters with Charlie’s pictures on them for a vigil, you have to let them do that. We can prosecute you for that.”
“I have Harmeet Dhillon right now in our civil rights unit looking at that immediately, that Office Depot had done that,” Bondi added. “We’re looking it up.”
Private companies have a constitutional right to refuse service to anyone as long as it’s for non-discriminatory reasons. However, people are pointing to recent Supreme Court rulings that appear to contradict that statute.
In 2023, the Supreme Court sided with a Colorado Christian website designer who did not want to create a website for same-sex couples, despite the state’s anti-discrimination laws. The Supreme Court said the First Amendment protected the designer from creating websites she doesn’t believe in.