Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Palin amuses me. She seems so *thinks of first term which connotes* maverick. Does she not have advisors and those who handle PR? If she does, then she must ignore them. The impression I have is : She speaks much from a position of ignorance.
Her and Cheney both, they have no clue that there are hundreds of video recordings of them saying one thing back then and now another.
She has a lot of nerve opening her huge mouth when Alaska was melting all around her, the moron.
I think it would be an excellent idea for all those who absolutely do not believe in global warming to buy up all the low lying coastal land.
Nobody will have enough money after Obama and his Socialist friends steal our income to hand it out to dumb-assed libturds that just pull down the "D" lever every election. He is bankrupting the USA. Libturds everywhere are giddy about it.
____Sinatra, if Portage Glacier or Exit Glacier up by Anchorage took a step forward that year from a cold winter it would be the first time in quite awhile. I've seen the tree succession and photo evidence of those. Seems an odd thing to claim if we're economically thrilled about the chances to send ships through the Arctic for the first time.
I've been here. It was pretty cool.
The Medieval Warm Period isn't a secret, neither is the cool period or the probable "Roman" cool period. either. Heck, we could be entering one now.
There is a risky, radical experiment going on by climate liberals. Folks who play loose w/o fear of the repercussions of their actions.
No one doubts what happens when you add greenhouse gasses to an atmosphere. They do what they do and hold in heat. We know that every year humans toss in another 2% to 5% to the CO2 mix. (Seems like it would double it in 20 to 50 years). We wonder how much it will take on a planet wide level. Will you error on the conservative side or take a risk?
I don't know if the glaciers "should be" retreating from the last ice age, staying still, or growing. Wanna hope for the best?
I/we don't know if there is a tipping point or how long the recovery to "normal" is if we do jerk up the environment by heating up the planet.
Question is, do you feel lucky?
Sinatra, is that today's weather map or an average temperature over this or that period?
If it is just for today it has little to do with global warming or cooling.
Lets say hypothetically the whole world was 2 degrees F warmer. Well, it would be a blustery 22 outside today instead of 20! Wouldn't show up well in daily maps.
Usually don't we put up SOMEONE's map of average yearly temperatures. We can get back to the more interesting discussion concerning if the map was bought to keep big oil companies profitable or if it was part of a conspiracy started in 1985 to collect cap & trade taxes in 2003.
Its clear that the world was warmer during medieval times. Marked on the map are study after study (all peer-reviewed) from all around the world with results of temperatures from the medieval time compared to today. These use ice cores, stalagmites, sediments, and isotopes. They agree with 6,144 boreholes around the world which found that temperatures were about 0.5°C warmer world wide.
Fraudulent hockey sticks and hidden data « JoNova
Palin amuses me. She seems so *thinks of first term which connotes* maverick. Does she not have advisors and those who handle PR? If she does, then she must ignore them. The impression I have is : She speaks much from a position of ignorance.
Her and Cheney both, they have no clue that there are hundreds of video recordings of them saying one thing back then and now another.
She has a lot of nerve opening her huge mouth when Alaska was melting all around her, the moron.
It's more proof that she is pandering to a certain rightwing market.
BRRRRRRRRR.......
It be chilly here in Michigan. Where the Global Warming Al?
Sinatra, is that today's weather map or an average temperature over this or that period?
If it is just for today it has little to do with global warming or cooling.
Lets say hypothetically the whole world was 2 degrees F warmer. Well, it would be a blustery 22 outside today instead of 20! Wouldn't show up well in daily maps.
Usually don't we put up SOMEONE's map of average yearly temperatures. We can get back to the more interesting discussion concerning if the map was bought to keep big oil companies profitable or if it was part of a conspiracy started in 1985 to collect cap & trade taxes in 2003.
Its clear that the world was warmer during medieval times. Marked on the map are study after study (all peer-reviewed) from all around the world with results of temperatures from the medieval time compared to today. These use ice cores, stalagmites, sediments, and isotopes. They agree with 6,144 boreholes around the world which found that temperatures were about 0.5°C warmer world wide.
Fraudulent hockey sticks and hidden data « JoNova
_____
You mean the one showing the earth was considerably warmer during the Medieval Warm Period than it is now?
Care to answer Jay?
Do you approve of manipulating data in order to get the results you want rather than factual results?
Toronado3800 said:Question is, do you feel lucky?
Sarah Palin is at it again - speaking with clear conviction on the sham science behind the man-made global warming leap-of-faith religion in a recent column in the Washington Post...
____
Copenhagen's political science
By Sarah Palin
Wednesday, December 9, 2009
With the publication of damaging e-mails from a climate research center in Britain, the radical environmental movement appears to face a tipping point. The revelation of appalling actions by so-called climate change experts allows the American public to finally understand the concerns so many of us have articulated on this issue.
...The e-mails reveal that leading climate "experts" deliberately destroyed records, manipulated data to "hide the decline" in global temperatures, and tried to silence their critics by preventing them from publishing in peer-reviewed journals. What's more, the documents show that there was no real consensus even within the CRU crowd. Some scientists had strong doubts about the accuracy of estimates of temperatures from centuries ago, estimates used to back claims that more recent temperatures are rising at an alarming rate.
...In his inaugural address, President Obama declared his intention to "restore science to its rightful place." But instead of staying home from Copenhagen and sending a message that the United States will not be a party to fraudulent scientific practices, the president has upped the ante. He plans to fly in at the climax of the conference in hopes of sealing a "deal." Whatever deal he gets, it will be no deal for the American people. What Obama really hopes to bring home from Copenhagen is more pressure to pass the Democrats' cap-and-tax proposal. This is a political move. The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs -- particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science.
Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen.
____
Full article here:
washingtonpost.com