Palestinians have lost any sense of morality

[The Rabbi]

Gee it must be tough to be pro Palestinian. You rely on lies and propaganda told by the jew haters and then look like a dope when said propaganda is shown to be false.

 

[Billo_Really]

Would that be the Goldstone Report that Goldstone recanted?

He didn't recant the Report. That's just bullshit Israeli propaganda. He said he would've written it "differently", if more evidence had been presented by the Israeli's, but he didn't take back what he said. In addition, the other members of the committee that helped write the Report, say everything they wrote, still stands.

So no, there was no evidence of them using human shields.

I do find it interesting you don't have the balls to comment on the mountain of evidence showing Israeli soldiers using human shields on a regular basis. What's the matter? Did the cat get your vagina?

Or the Goldstone report that came out three years before Israel kicked Hamas butt and Hamas tried to maximize civilian casualties?

Israel drops 2000 pound bombs that take out entire city blocks and you claim Hamas is using human shields? That's a little retarded!

In either case you're an ill informed douchebag.

And you're all mouth with no ability to back up what you say.

 

[Billo_Really]

Do you have something of substance to contribute?

That's pretty funny, coming from you!

 

[Billo_Really]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

 

[Phoenall]

Israeli bombs and missiles killed the children. No one else. All propaganda in the world cant change that fact lying Rabbit and Phoney. And, below is UN information, not propaganda.

"A senior official of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) said here Thursday that a total of 469 children were killed in the Gaza Strip, where the situation is "dire" because of its debilitating effect on the 1 million Gaza Strip inhabitants under the age of 18."

Children s death toll rises to 469 in Gaza UNICEF official - Xinhua English.news.cn

Does not alter the CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW that puts the onus onto hamas to protect those children from harm. They should evacuate them to a safe place at the very least, by forcing them to stay were they know fighting will take place they are in breach of humanitarian law and the Geneva conventions. And in law that blame lies with hamas who should be charged with war crimes and murder for those deaths.

I forgot Israel are so INNOCENT.......what a crock of shit you spew.......You must think we are total Morons.....since 1948 over 70,000 Palestinian DEAD....over 15,000 Children and Babies...............Israel in total 12,000............So explain WHY ISRAEL WON'T ALLOW UN Peacekeepers in the dividing zone......You are a recalcitrant LIAR

What dividing zone as none exists. Why have so many Palestinians been killed should be your question, followed by what are the P.A. doing to minimise the numbers of deaths during conflicts.

BUT STILL DOES NOT ALTER the CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW that puts the onus onto hamas to protect those children from harm. They should evacuate them to a safe place at the very least, by forcing them to stay were they know fighting will take place they are in breach of humanitarian law and the Geneva conventions. And in law that blame lies with hamas who should be charged with war crimes and murder for those deaths. Look it up and see just what hamas should be doing to protect its citizens from harm every time that start firing rockets at Israel.

 

[Phoenall]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

Says who ?

human shield - definition of human shield by The Free Dictionary


human shield
n.
1. A person who volunteers or is forced to take up a position at a likely military target as a means of forestalling an enemy attack.
2. A person who is used as a shield by someone in a confrontation with the police in order to prevent capture.

Says it all really doesn't it and yes firing from civilian areas is forcing the civilians to be human shields.

Then this from IHL

http://www.marshallcenter.org/mcpublicweb/MCDocs/files/College/HShlds-Schmitt.Pdf


Human shielding involves the use of persons protected by international
humanitarian law, such as prisoners of war or civilians, to deter attacks on
combatants and military objectives.

public opinion was shocked by certain instances (fortunately rare) of
belligerents compelling civilians to remain in places of strategic
importance (such as railway stations, viaducts, dams, power stations or
factories), or to accompany military convoys, or again, to serve as a
protective screen for the fighting troops. Such practices, the object of
which is to divert enemy fire, have rightly been condemned as cruel and
barbaric

 

[toastman]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

Yes it is. It might not be the U.N definition, but it is one of the definitions.
Regardless, what Hamas does is still disgusting

 

[toastman]

Gee it must be tough to be pro Palestinian. You rely on lies and propaganda told by the jew haters and then look like a dope when said propaganda is shown to be false.

Hahaha I said the same thing

 

[The Rabbi]

Would that be the Goldstone Report that Goldstone recanted?

He didn't recant the Report. That's just bullshit Israeli propaganda. He said he would've written it "differently", if more evidence had been presented by the Israeli's, but he didn't take back what he said. In addition, the other members of the committee that helped write the Report, say everything they wrote, still stands.

So no, there was no evidence of them using human shields.

I do find it interesting you don't have the balls to comment on the mountain of evidence showing Israeli soldiers using human shields on a regular basis. What's the matter? Did the cat get your vagina?

Or the Goldstone report that came out three years before Israel kicked Hamas butt and Hamas tried to maximize civilian casualties?

Israel drops 2000 pound bombs that take out entire city blocks and you claim Hamas is using human shields? That's a little retarded!

In either case you're an ill informed douchebag.

And you're all mouth with no ability to back up what you say.

No examples of Israel using people as human shields.
Whatever you want to call what Hamas does, stationing military installations where civilians are in the hopes that civilians get killed for propaganda purposes is disgusting and immoral and anyone who supports that is morally blind and ethically dead.

 

[Humanity]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

Says who ?

human shield - definition of human shield by The Free Dictionary


human shield
n.
1. A person who volunteers or is forced to take up a position at a likely military target as a means of forestalling an enemy attack.
2. A person who is used as a shield by someone in a confrontation with the police in order to prevent capture.

Says it all really doesn't it and yes firing from civilian areas is forcing the civilians to be human shields.

Then this from IHL

http://www.marshallcenter.org/mcpublicweb/MCDocs/files/College/HShlds-Schmitt.Pdf


Human shielding involves the use of persons protected by international
humanitarian law, such as prisoners of war or civilians, to deter attacks on
combatants and military objectives.

public opinion was shocked by certain instances (fortunately rare) of
belligerents compelling civilians to remain in places of strategic
importance (such as railway stations, viaducts, dams, power stations or
factories), or to accompany military convoys, or again, to serve as a
protective screen for the fighting troops. Such practices, the object of
which is to divert enemy fire, have rightly been condemned as cruel and
barbaric

Whooooo...

Hey Phoney, can you show that to your Rabid friend... Maybe he will see that "Human Shield" doesn't mean "Dead Shield".

Thanks dude

 

[Roudy]

I might be a bit old fashion but foul language is not helping either point of view.

There is no point of view. inHumanity proclaimed he was a stupid prick. I heartily agree. It pretty much means you can ignore anything he says.

Yup, I was there, I saw inhumanity clearly say he'd rather be a stupid prick. Here's a guy who's stated goal in life has already been achieved.

Well roodboy you were in the wrong place dude...

Rabid is a dumbass, never thought it would be so easy to call you a dumbass too!

Go read what I wrote dude!

Did you show your stupid prick diploma to all your Palestinian friends?

 

[Roudy]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

Says who ?

human shield - definition of human shield by The Free Dictionary


human shield
n.
1. A person who volunteers or is forced to take up a position at a likely military target as a means of forestalling an enemy attack.
2. A person who is used as a shield by someone in a confrontation with the police in order to prevent capture.

Says it all really doesn't it and yes firing from civilian areas is forcing the civilians to be human shields.

Then this from IHL

http://www.marshallcenter.org/mcpublicweb/MCDocs/files/College/HShlds-Schmitt.Pdf


Human shielding involves the use of persons protected by international
humanitarian law, such as prisoners of war or civilians, to deter attacks on
combatants and military objectives.

public opinion was shocked by certain instances (fortunately rare) of
belligerents compelling civilians to remain in places of strategic
importance (such as railway stations, viaducts, dams, power stations or
factories), or to accompany military convoys, or again, to serve as a
protective screen for the fighting troops. Such practices, the object of
which is to divert enemy fire, have rightly been condemned as cruel and
barbaric

Whooooo...

Hey Phoney, can you show that to your Rabid friend... Maybe he will see that "Human Shield" doesn't mean "Dead Shield".

Thanks dude

Who gives a ****! Palestinians are scumbag lowlifes who use their own people as human shields, desd or alive. Case closed.

 

[montelatici]

Drank a bit too much punk. Stay off the sauce when you post your nonsense. Israelis are the scumbag murderers of children.

 

[Roudy]

Drank a bit too much punk. Stay off the sauce when you post your nonsense. Israelis are the scumbag murderers of children.

Ha ha ha. Accusing Israel of what you Muslims are most guilty of? This propoganda technique of you terrorist ass kissers is getting quite old.

It takes a depraved culture of Palestinian child killers and suicide Bombers to have asshole supporters like you.

 

[The Rabbi]

Hamas uses human shields by firing from civilian areas, therefore instigating return fire to that area. Why can't demented pro Palestinians understand this ?

I'm sorry, but that's not the definition of a human shield.

Says who ?

human shield - definition of human shield by The Free Dictionary


human shield
n.
1. A person who volunteers or is forced to take up a position at a likely military target as a means of forestalling an enemy attack.
2. A person who is used as a shield by someone in a confrontation with the police in order to prevent capture.

Says it all really doesn't it and yes firing from civilian areas is forcing the civilians to be human shields.

Then this from IHL

http://www.marshallcenter.org/mcpublicweb/MCDocs/files/College/HShlds-Schmitt.Pdf


Human shielding involves the use of persons protected by international
humanitarian law, such as prisoners of war or civilians, to deter attacks on
combatants and military objectives.

public opinion was shocked by certain instances (fortunately rare) of
belligerents compelling civilians to remain in places of strategic
importance (such as railway stations, viaducts, dams, power stations or
factories), or to accompany military convoys, or again, to serve as a
protective screen for the fighting troops. Such practices, the object of
which is to divert enemy fire, have rightly been condemned as cruel and
barbaric

Whooooo...

Hey Phoney, can you show that to your Rabid friend... Maybe he will see that "Human Shield" doesn't mean "Dead Shield".

Thanks dude

Who gives a ****! Palestinians are scumbag lowlifes who use their own people as human shields, desd or alive. Case closed.

They try to muddy the waters with fine semantic distinctions.
The only real issue here is why they fail to condemn Hamas for inviting casualties involving children and non combatants but score Israel, even though they cannot find a single example of Israel using people as human shields.

 

[Beelzebub]

It is one thing to stir up a vicious, homicidal monster.
It is another thing to BE the vicious homicidal monster.

Israel killed the innocents of Gaza. When they didn't need to. And after massive incitement by Israel which triggered what they call 'incitement' from Gaza.

 

[toastman]

It's not Israel calling it incitement. What Hamas did WAS incitement. Launching rockets into Israel day after day, week after week is eventually going to incite a response .

STOP launching rockets. It's that simple, yet people make it out to be so complicated.

 

[Roudy]

It is one thing to stir up a vicious, homicidal monster.
It is another thing to BE the vicious homicidal monster.

Israel killed the innocents of Gaza. When they didn't need to. And after massive incitement by Israel which triggered what they call 'incitement' from Gaza.

These days "homicidal monster" and Palestininians / Muslims are synonymous.

 

[The Rabbi]

It is one thing to stir up a vicious, homicidal monster.
It is another thing to BE the vicious homicidal monster.

Israel killed the innocents of Gaza. When they didn't need to. And after massive incitement by Israel which triggered what they call 'incitement' from Gaza.

Israel defended itself from terrorism fomented by Hamas in Gaza. Hamas made sure civilians and esp children there would suffer deaths that could be used for propaganda purposes among the latent jew haters and brain dead (but I repeat myself here). Based on your posts they were successful.

 

[The Rabbi]

It's not Israel calling it incitement. What Hamas did WAS incitement. Launching rockets into Israel day after day, week after week is eventually going to incite a response .

STOP launching rockets. It's that simple, yet people make it out to be so complicated.

Hamas was incited to launch rockets after an Israeli in a cafe gave the finger to a Palestinian cab driver.