Palestinian Terrorists

[Fenton Lum]

Perhaps the Palestinians will pay as much attention to AI as the Israelis have paid to their own UN sanctions, heh?

• Israeli arms sales to Europe grew from $724M in 2014 to $1.63B in 2015
• Although the size of New Jersey Israel is one of the top 10 arms dealing nations in the world
• Israel produces 60% of all drones worldwide and sells to over 50 countries, at times selling to both sides of a given conflict, and Israel fueled the drones arms race between India and Pakistan

Palestine is an open air weapons testing and crowd control laboratory with Palestinians being used in the development phase; Gaza is a lab of mass destruction. US super bunker busters were supplied to the Israelis in 2014 and investors stock shot up; war is just business after all.

The “War in Terror” has been a boon to the industry, you’ve seen what amounts to advertisement in every “news” outlet, we are being whipped up into a frenzy once again. The industry also pioneers crowd control research on the Palestinians, and Israel is involved in the training of American forces and law enforcement. We see this in the militarization of our own police departments, Ferguson was but one example of how our system is prepping to Palestinianize our own population, and in fact Ferguson now has Israeli developed/sold skunk spray post the Ferguson events, although no incidents have yet been reported of use on American streets. It’s pretty clear that the Israeli occupation style power structure is moving toward the same in America; a warehousing of the poor in a post industrial age with diminishing living wage jobs and privatized for profit prisons complete with a return to convict leasing.

Much of the security monitoring and mass surveillance technologies are also produced in Israel and sold across the globe. “Targeted assassination” was invented in Israel, which Obama was quite fond of. Abu Ghraib torture methods? Israel.

The US and Israel are not allies. The US and Israeli arms dealers are allies, and war is the business they are both in. We are all collateral damage.

Israel is a technology leader.

Pass that on to your friends.

Israel is a leader in modern colonization and ethnic cleansing, nothing more.

You have been taking lessons in writing clichés, right?

If you want to be honest with yourself about what ideology is a leader in colonization and ethnic cleansing, you can spend a bit of time exploring what is taking place across so much of the Islamist Middle East and North Africa.

Here's a fun fact, the various tribes of Arabs - Islamists have managed to slaughter (in the most inventive ways), overwhelmingly, other tribes of Arabs-Islamists.

Yee-haw.

And those savages in the "new world" too, that's why we got to slaughter them.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Islam. It's a complete way of life, until Islamics kill you by burning, smooshing, bombing, shooting, beheading, stabbing, torturing, dismembering, blowing your brains out or drowning you in a cage.

It really is a freakin' party.

Death Toll From War in Syria Now 470,000, Group Finds

Off topic. This is the Israel and Palestine forum.

Well yeah, but even those who support it understand what it is and have to scurry for justifications. Don't forget the old standard "but they're evil".

 

[Fenton Lum]

Off topic. This is the Israel and Palestine forum.

So, then, tell us about and give us some relevant examples of the ethnic cleansing taking place comparing the ethnicities in Israel vs. those in the Islamic terrorist enclaces of Gaza'istan and Fatah'istan.

Israel was created by the crime of ethnic cleansing and that ethnic cleansing continues today.

1948 Arab–Israeli War - Wikipedia

Relevance?

Are you retarded?
And by the way, I love the way you pull the Israel/Palestine Forum bullshit.
You want us to believe that the rest of the Arab world is at each others throats, not to mention Global Jihad, yet the West Bank Jordanians are as innocent as freshly fallen snowflakes.

All while we supply the Wahabist (the extremist of the extremist Islamists) Saudis the illegal (via International Law) cluster bombs (known to have a 90% collateral casualty rate in the field) that they rain down on Yemen. Phuggin’ phenomenal.

 

[MJB12741]

Further, the OP wonders how to make peace with a group of people who are willing to harm not only their enemies civilians, but their OWN as well.

Exactly. And when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes no one can logically ***** about it being biased toward Israel.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

 

[MJB12741]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

See for yourselves folks. Just like I said, when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes NO ONE can LOGICALLY ***** about it being biased toward Israel. And then there is Tinmore. Heh Heh!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

See for yourselves folks. Just like I said, when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes NO ONE can LOGICALLY ***** about it being biased toward Israel. And then there is Tinmore. Heh Heh!

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

 

[montelatici]

"Israel committed war crimes in 2014, says Amnesty International"

Israel committed war crimes in 2014, says Amnesty International

 

[Indeependent]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

Sorry asshole, nobody gives a shit about the facts of a keyboard warrior who's never been to "Palestine".

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

See for yourselves folks. Just like I said, when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes NO ONE can LOGICALLY ***** about it being biased toward Israel. And then there is Tinmore. Heh Heh!

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

I'm sure you can convince yourself of the cliché "false assumptions" you use as another of the slogans that you dump into various threads, but others are a bit more discriminating

 

[Shusha]

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

It does not in the least "skew" the rest of the report. Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. It makes no difference whatsoever where those weapons are fired from or to in terms of how you want to label those places.

 

[Indeependent]

Indeed, when the Palestinians fire into Sderot, for example, they are firing into Palestinian territory.

The reports are based on false assumptions.

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

See for yourselves folks. Just like I said, when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes NO ONE can LOGICALLY ***** about it being biased toward Israel. And then there is Tinmore. Heh Heh!

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

I'm sure you can convince yourself of the cliché "false assumptions" you use as another of the slogans that you dump into various threads, but others are a bit more discriminating

Have some respect, Tinmore got his doctorate from YouTube.

 

[P F Tinmore]

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

It does not in the least "skew" the rest of the report. Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. It makes no difference whatsoever where those weapons are fired from or to in terms of how you want to label those places.

It does. Basing your conclusions on false premise cannot bring an accurate report.

 

[Indeependent]

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

It does not in the least "skew" the rest of the report. Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. It makes no difference whatsoever where those weapons are fired from or to in terms of how you want to label those places.

It does. Basing your conclusions on false premise cannot bring an accurate report.

Talk about false premises...you've never been in the region.
You're such a tool.

 

[Hollie]

The report is not in the least based on false assumptions because it matters not one bit to the report what political name you want to give to the territory in which Hamas operated.

The point of the report is to condemn Hamas and Gazans for unlawful actions: firing indiscriminate rockets and endangering protected persons by placing military objectives in their midst.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

This thread is not about Israel or Israel's actions. Its about the unlawful behaviour of the Palestinians.

With false reports?

See for yourselves folks. Just like I said, when Amnesty International Charges Palestinian Terror Groups with War Crimes NO ONE can LOGICALLY ***** about it being biased toward Israel. And then there is Tinmore. Heh Heh!

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

I'm sure you can convince yourself of the cliché "false assumptions" you use as another of the slogans that you dump into various threads, but others are a bit more discriminating

Have some respect, Tinmore got his doctorate from YouTube.

Although, he didn't get the Ph.D (Doctor of Philosophy), degree that you might think. He got a PHD, a Post Hole Digger. They're on sale at home and garden centers.

 

[Shusha]

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

It does not in the least "skew" the rest of the report. Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. It makes no difference whatsoever where those weapons are fired from or to in terms of how you want to label those places.

It does. Basing your conclusions on false premise cannot bring an accurate report.

No, it does not. The answer to "Is indiscriminate firing of weapons a war crime?" is NOT: "It depends on who you are indiscriminately firing at". Nor is it: "It depends on whether or not you think you own the territory into which you are firing".

Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Period.

Deliberately placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. Period.

Why do you justify war crimes?

 

[Hollie]

I can't help but see a stinging irony in Islamic terrorists from one tribe of Islamism being on the business end of the gee-had from a competing tribe.



https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/n...-killed-by-hamas-forces-during-2014-conflict/


Hamas forces carried out a brutal campaign of abductions, torture and unlawful killings against Palestinians accused of “collaborating” with Israel and others during Israel’s military offensive against Gaza in July and August 2014, according to a new report by Amnesty International.

‘Strangling Necks’: Abduction, torture and summary killings of Palestinians by Hamas forces during the 2014 Gaza/Israel conflict highlights a series of abuses, such as the extrajudicial execution of at least 23 Palestinians and the arrest and torture of dozens of others, including members and supporters of Hamas’s political rivals, Fatah.


Lions and tigers and bears, oh my... strangling and torture and summary killings, oh my.

 

[BulletProof]

What are the Palestinians suppose to do? Rollover for Jews who have no intent on ever giving up the land nor giving citizenship to Palestinians? What's Hamas suppose to do, be unpaid collaborators with Israel and police the Palestinians for Israel?

Jews killed Jesus and they're hostile to all men... So says the Bible.

 

[Indeependent]

I already picked out one false assumption. One that skews the rest of the report.

It does not in the least "skew" the rest of the report. Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. It makes no difference whatsoever where those weapons are fired from or to in terms of how you want to label those places.

It does. Basing your conclusions on false premise cannot bring an accurate report.

No, it does not. The answer to "Is indiscriminate firing of weapons a war crime?" is NOT: "It depends on who you are indiscriminately firing at". Nor is it: "It depends on whether or not you think you own the territory into which you are firing".

Indiscriminate firing of weapons is a war crime. Period.

Deliberately placing military objectives in the midst of protected persons is a war crime. Period.

Why do you justify war crimes?

Give Pffft abreak; he's seen more Jew aggression on YouTube than you.

 

[montelatici]

By definition, people under foreign occupation cannot be terrorists. It would be like calling the Native Americans terrorists when they attacked European settlers. They were simply native people resisting an an invasion.