Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
10,343
Reaction score
2,721
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Time-out...

Linda Sarsour is a Terrorists Dream
Are you all...like...in third grade?
(COMMENT)

Just what in the hell do you think a terrorist is?

Are you trying to say that the Arab Palestinians don't fit this description?

ARTCLE 2 Suppression of Terrorist Bombing .png
Are you saying that the Arab Palestinians have not violated these prohibited acts?

Article 1 EU Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
Terrorist offences and fundamental rights and principles​
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to below in points (a) to (i), as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of:​
- seriously intimidating a population, or​
- unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or​
- seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation,​
shall be deemed to be terrorist offences:​
(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;​
(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person;​
(c) kidnapping or hostage taking;​
(d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property likely to endanger human life or result in major economic loss;​
(e) seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public or goods transport;​
(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;​
(g) release of dangerous substances, or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(i) threatening to commit any of the acts listed in (a) to (h).​

Are you trying to say that None of the Arab Palestinians were fitting the description just laid-out?

Just what the hell are you implying. Are you trying to justify terrorist acts? Are you changing the definition of terrorist acts? Be clear and concise that that everyone understands what you mean when you call these accusations of Arab Palestinian Terrorism "Childish."

The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?

If you don't answer the question directly, THEN I can only assume that you concede that the Arab Palestinians have maintained a terrorist campaign since the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Time-out...

Linda Sarsour is a Terrorists Dream
Are you all...like...in third grade?
(COMMENT)

Just what in the hell do you think a terrorist is?

Are you trying to say that the Arab Palestinians don't fit this description?

Are you saying that the Arab Palestinians have not violated these prohibited acts?

Article 1 EU Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
Terrorist offences and fundamental rights and principles​
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to below in points (a) to (i), as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of:​
- seriously intimidating a population, or​
- unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or​
- seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation,​
shall be deemed to be terrorist offences:​
(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;​
(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person;​
(c) kidnapping or hostage taking;​
(d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property likely to endanger human life or result in major economic loss;​
(e) seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public or goods transport;​
(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;​
(g) release of dangerous substances, or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(i) threatening to commit any of the acts listed in (a) to (h).​

Are you trying to say that None of the Arab Palestinians were fitting the description just laid-out?

Just what the hell are you implying. Are you trying to justify terrorist acts? Are you changing the definition of terrorist acts? Be clear and concise that that everyone understands what you mean when you call these accusations of Arab Palestinian Terrorism "Childish."

The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?

If you don't answer the question directly, THEN I can only assume that you concede that the Arab Palestinians have maintained a terrorist campaign since the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
Linda Sarsour has never as much as picked up a rock.

Piddlyshit compared to Israel's crimes. And besides, Palestinian actions are in self defense.
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Time-out...

Linda Sarsour is a Terrorists Dream
Are you all...like...in third grade?
(COMMENT)

Just what in the hell do you think a terrorist is?

Are you trying to say that the Arab Palestinians don't fit this description?

Are you saying that the Arab Palestinians have not violated these prohibited acts?

Article 1 EU Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
Terrorist offences and fundamental rights and principles​
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to below in points (a) to (i), as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of:​
- seriously intimidating a population, or​
- unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or​
- seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation,​
shall be deemed to be terrorist offences:​
(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;​
(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person;​
(c) kidnapping or hostage taking;​
(d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property likely to endanger human life or result in major economic loss;​
(e) seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public or goods transport;​
(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;​
(g) release of dangerous substances, or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(i) threatening to commit any of the acts listed in (a) to (h).​

Are you trying to say that None of the Arab Palestinians were fitting the description just laid-out?

Just what the hell are you implying. Are you trying to justify terrorist acts? Are you changing the definition of terrorist acts? Be clear and concise that that everyone understands what you mean when you call these accusations of Arab Palestinian Terrorism "Childish."

The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?

If you don't answer the question directly, THEN I can only assume that you concede that the Arab Palestinians have maintained a terrorist campaign since the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
Are there any of these that Israel does not do?
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
37,623
Reaction score
4,155
Points
1,130
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Time-out...

Linda Sarsour is a Terrorists Dream
Are you all...like...in third grade?
(COMMENT)

Just what in the hell do you think a terrorist is?

Are you trying to say that the Arab Palestinians don't fit this description?

Are you saying that the Arab Palestinians have not violated these prohibited acts?

Article 1 EU Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
Terrorist offences and fundamental rights and principles​
1. Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the intentional acts referred to below in points (a) to (i), as defined as offences under national law, which, given their nature or context, may seriously damage a country or an international organisation where committed with the aim of:​
- seriously intimidating a population, or​
- unduly compelling a Government or international organisation to perform or abstain from performing any act, or​
- seriously destabilising or destroying the fundamental political, constitutional, economic or social structures of a country or an international organisation,​
shall be deemed to be terrorist offences:​
(a) attacks upon a person's life which may cause death;​
(b) attacks upon the physical integrity of a person;​
(c) kidnapping or hostage taking;​
(d) causing extensive destruction to a Government or public facility, a transport system, an infrastructure facility, including an information system, a fixed platform located on the continental shelf, a public place or private property likely to endanger human life or result in major economic loss;​
(e) seizure of aircraft, ships or other means of public or goods transport;​
(f) manufacture, possession, acquisition, transport, supply or use of weapons, explosives or of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons, as well as research into, and development of, biological and chemical weapons;​
(g) release of dangerous substances, or causing fires, floods or explosions the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(h) interfering with or disrupting the supply of water, power or any other fundamental natural resource the effect of which is to endanger human life;​
(i) threatening to commit any of the acts listed in (a) to (h).​

Are you trying to say that None of the Arab Palestinians were fitting the description just laid-out?

Just what the hell are you implying. Are you trying to justify terrorist acts? Are you changing the definition of terrorist acts? Be clear and concise that that everyone understands what you mean when you call these accusations of Arab Palestinian Terrorism "Childish."

The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?

If you don't answer the question directly, THEN I can only assume that you concede that the Arab Palestinians have maintained a terrorist campaign since the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
Linda Sarsour has never as much as picked up a rock.

Piddlyshit compared to Israel's crimes. And besides, Palestinian actions are in self defense.
Pali acts of Islamic terrorism are not in self defense.
 

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
10,343
Reaction score
2,721
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You didn't answer the question.



The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?
Are there any of these that Israel does not do?
(COMMENT)

This is fallacious in that the violent and terrorist acts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) cannot (realistically) be justified by injecting a counter-claim that the Israelis do it too... That is demonstrating a lack of moral relativism on the part of the HoAP. HoAP violence is wrong on three distinct levels.

Criminal Law:​
◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.​
Human Rights Law:​
Humanitarian Law:​
◈ Under Article 68 • Fourth Geneva Convention → the HoAP can be punished for any offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.​

This is not to exclude the violations of Incitement to violence - or - the Customary Law on HoAP conducting operations in the Proximity to civilians. And it is certainly not meant to exclude attempts to convince fellow HoAP constituents that such violence is legal as Self-Defense Measures, or that the specific targeting against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place is not a violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. There is no question that the HoAP has a policy with respect to war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes (Article 8(1) • War Crimes • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court).
"Martyr Dalal Mughrabi is a symbol of legitimate human struggle against injustice, oppression, and the occupation that has committed crimes against the Palestinian people throughout its 71 years. The use of Dalal's name in the summer camps of [Fatah's] Shabiba Student (sic., High School) Movement is nothing but commemoration of a situation of struggle, which has been waged by our Palestinian people that was uprooted from its land and homeland as a result of the crimes, oppression, and massacres that the Zionist gangs committed against it. Therefore, Dalal Mughrabi's [actions] are a natural human expression that all human laws guarantee for the oppressed peoples that are struggling to be redeemed from injustice and occupation."
Official Fatah Facebook page, July 16, 2019
Linda Sarsour has never as much as picked up a rock.

Piddlyshit compared to Israel's crimes. And besides, Palestinian actions are in self defense.
(COMMENT)

There is no legitimacy behind the claim of self-defense. Israel did not assume effective control of any Palestinian Territory. It established the State of Israel under self-determination pursuant to recommendations by the UN. It assumed control of the West Bank after it was abandoned by the Jordanians and in the absence of a separate Arab Palestinian Government. It attempts to operate Area "C" pursuant to the agreement (full civil and security control) under the Oslo Accords.

What moral high ground does the HoAP claim that they have not contaminated by drawing first blood?

Go back to Posting #502 and answer the questions...

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You didn't answer the question.



The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?
Are there any of these that Israel does not do?
(COMMENT)

This is fallacious in that the violent and terrorist acts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) cannot (realistically) be justified by injecting a counter-claim that the Israelis do it too... That is demonstrating a lack of moral relativism on the part of the HoAP. HoAP violence is wrong on three distinct levels.

Criminal Law:​
◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.​
Human Rights Law:​
Humanitarian Law:​
◈ Under Article 68 • Fourth Geneva Convention → the HoAP can be punished for any offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.​

This is not to exclude the violations of Incitement to violence - or - the Customary Law on HoAP conducting operations in the Proximity to civilians. And it is certainly not meant to exclude attempts to convince fellow HoAP constituents that such violence is legal as Self-Defense Measures, or that the specific targeting against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place is not a violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. There is no question that the HoAP has a policy with respect to war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes (Article 8(1) • War Crimes • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court).
"Martyr Dalal Mughrabi is a symbol of legitimate human struggle against injustice, oppression, and the occupation that has committed crimes against the Palestinian people throughout its 71 years. The use of Dalal's name in the summer camps of [Fatah's] Shabiba Student (sic., High School) Movement is nothing but commemoration of a situation of struggle, which has been waged by our Palestinian people that was uprooted from its land and homeland as a result of the crimes, oppression, and massacres that the Zionist gangs committed against it. Therefore, Dalal Mughrabi's [actions] are a natural human expression that all human laws guarantee for the oppressed peoples that are struggling to be redeemed from injustice and occupation."
Official Fatah Facebook page, July 16, 2019
Linda Sarsour has never as much as picked up a rock.

Piddlyshit compared to Israel's crimes. And besides, Palestinian actions are in self defense.
(COMMENT)

There is no legitimacy behind the claim of self-defense. Israel did not assume effective control of any Palestinian Territory. It established the State of Israel under self-determination pursuant to recommendations by the UN. It assumed control of the West Bank after it was abandoned by the Jordanians and in the absence of a separate Arab Palestinian Government. It attempts to operate Area "C" pursuant to the agreement (full civil and security control) under the Oslo Accords.

What moral high ground does the HoAP claim that they have not contaminated by drawing first blood?

Go back to Posting #502 and answer the questions...

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
Not only does Israel do it too, it does it more and first.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
37,623
Reaction score
4,155
Points
1,130
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You didn't answer the question.



The Arab Palestinians either violated International Law - or - they have not... Which is it?
Are there any of these that Israel does not do?
(COMMENT)

This is fallacious in that the violent and terrorist acts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) cannot (realistically) be justified by injecting a counter-claim that the Israelis do it too... That is demonstrating a lack of moral relativism on the part of the HoAP. HoAP violence is wrong on three distinct levels.

Criminal Law:​
◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.​
Human Rights Law:​
Humanitarian Law:​
◈ Under Article 68 • Fourth Geneva Convention → the HoAP can be punished for any offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power.​

This is not to exclude the violations of Incitement to violence - or - the Customary Law on HoAP conducting operations in the Proximity to civilians. And it is certainly not meant to exclude attempts to convince fellow HoAP constituents that such violence is legal as Self-Defense Measures, or that the specific targeting against various defined public places with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury, or with intent to cause extensive destruction of the public place is not a violation of the International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings. There is no question that the HoAP has a policy with respect to war crimes in particular when committed as part of a plan or policy or as part of a large-scale commission of such crimes (Article 8(1) • War Crimes • Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court).
"Martyr Dalal Mughrabi is a symbol of legitimate human struggle against injustice, oppression, and the occupation that has committed crimes against the Palestinian people throughout its 71 years. The use of Dalal's name in the summer camps of [Fatah's] Shabiba Student (sic., High School) Movement is nothing but commemoration of a situation of struggle, which has been waged by our Palestinian people that was uprooted from its land and homeland as a result of the crimes, oppression, and massacres that the Zionist gangs committed against it. Therefore, Dalal Mughrabi's [actions] are a natural human expression that all human laws guarantee for the oppressed peoples that are struggling to be redeemed from injustice and occupation."
Official Fatah Facebook page, July 16, 2019
Linda Sarsour has never as much as picked up a rock.

Piddlyshit compared to Israel's crimes. And besides, Palestinian actions are in self defense.
(COMMENT)

There is no legitimacy behind the claim of self-defense. Israel did not assume effective control of any Palestinian Territory. It established the State of Israel under self-determination pursuant to recommendations by the UN. It assumed control of the West Bank after it was abandoned by the Jordanians and in the absence of a separate Arab Palestinian Government. It attempts to operate Area "C" pursuant to the agreement (full civil and security control) under the Oslo Accords.

What moral high ground does the HoAP claim that they have not contaminated by drawing first blood?

Go back to Posting #502 and answer the questions...

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
Not only does Israel do it too, it does it more and first.
Another of your rants that 12 year olds dismiss as silly.
 

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
10,343
Reaction score
2,721
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: There you go again! You're making undefined allegations. And the allegations seem ambiguous.

◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.
By killing people and stealing their land.

You are a hoot.
(QUESTIONS)

◈ "Killing People" is one allegation.

◈ "Stealing Land" is a second allegation.

◈ "Killing People" to "steal" the victim's land is a compound allegation.

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean usurping sovereignty?

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean personal property?

◈ By "Killing" - did you mean a death involving the theft of personal property.

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of Non-International Armed Conflict under international humanitarian law →

a) common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949;​
b) Article 1 of Additional Protocol II:​

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of an international armed conflict engagement between two or more States (ie Israel 'vs' Palestine).

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of in violations of Customary Law:

a) Initiating hostile operations within or near densely populated areas.​
b) Failure to remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of Initiated hostile operations.​

(COMMENT)

You make these accusations, so broad and nebulous, that it becomes an ad Hoministic fallacy rather than a statement of some identifiable fact, pattern, or event. Your allegation is without substance or foundation.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: There you go again! You're making undefined allegations. And the allegations seem ambiguous.

◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.
By killing people and stealing their land.

You are a hoot.
(QUESTIONS)

◈ "Killing People" is one allegation.

◈ "Stealing Land" is a second allegation.

◈ "Killing People" to "steal" the victim's land is a compound allegation.

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean usurping sovereignty?

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean personal property?

◈ By "Killing" - did you mean a death involving the theft of personal property.

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of Non-International Armed Conflict under international humanitarian law →

a) common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949;​
b) Article 1 of Additional Protocol II:​

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of an international armed conflict engagement between two or more States (ie Israel 'vs' Palestine).

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of in violations of Customary Law:

a) Initiating hostile operations within or near densely populated areas.​
b) Failure to remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of Initiated hostile operations.​

(COMMENT)

You make these accusations, so broad and nebulous, that it becomes an ad Hoministic fallacy rather than a statement of some identifiable fact, pattern, or event. Your allegation is without substance or foundation.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
:eusa_doh: Oh geese.

You still don't know how settler colonialism works.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
37,623
Reaction score
4,155
Points
1,130
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: There you go again! You're making undefined allegations. And the allegations seem ambiguous.

◈ Interfering with the Occupying Powers duty to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety pursuant to Article 43 Law of Land Warfare.
By killing people and stealing their land.

You are a hoot.
(QUESTIONS)

◈ "Killing People" is one allegation.

◈ "Stealing Land" is a second allegation.

◈ "Killing People" to "steal" the victim's land is a compound allegation.

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean usurping sovereignty?

◈ By "stealing" - did you mean personal property?

◈ By "Killing" - did you mean a death involving the theft of personal property.

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of Non-International Armed Conflict under international humanitarian law →

a) common Article 3 to the Geneva Conventions of 1949;​
b) Article 1 of Additional Protocol II:​

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of an international armed conflict engagement between two or more States (ie Israel 'vs' Palestine).

◈ By "killing" - did you mean a death as a consequence of in violations of Customary Law:

a) Initiating hostile operations within or near densely populated areas.​
b) Failure to remove civilian persons and objects under its control from the vicinity of Initiated hostile operations.​

(COMMENT)

You make these accusations, so broad and nebulous, that it becomes an ad Hoministic fallacy rather than a statement of some identifiable fact, pattern, or event. Your allegation is without substance or foundation.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
:eusa_doh: Oh geese.

You still don't know how settler colonialism works.
Actually, it‘s defined clearly by the history of the Arab-Moslem armies which spilled out of the peninsula after the death of your warlord “prophet”.
 

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
10,343
Reaction score
2,721
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You are one to talk.

:eusa_doh: Oh geese.

You still don't know how settler colonialism works.
(COMMENT)

When you see the UN Proponent Agency for Decolonialization (C-24) (A/RES/15/1514 - Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries) list any place in the Middle East (anyplace at all) as subject to decolonization policy (A/RES/15/1514) - you be sure to let me know. Until then, don't pass yourself off as an authority on the subject. It only further penalizes your credibility.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You are one to talk.

:eusa_doh: Oh geese.

You still don't know how settler colonialism works.
(COMMENT)

When you see the UN Proponent Agency for Decolonialization (C-24) (A/RES/15/1514 - Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries) list any place in the Middle East (anyplace at all) as subject to decolonization policy (A/RES/15/1514) - you be sure to let me know. Until then, don't pass yourself off as an authority on the subject. It only further penalizes your credibility.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
They didn't even know in 1960. It takes time to develop a history. Particularly when there is a machine out there peddling deceit 24/7.

Settler colonialism is the proper term. It matches the documented history and the facts on the ground.

Rachel Busbridge on Israel-Palestine and the Settler Colonial ‘Turn’

 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
37,623
Reaction score
4,155
Points
1,130
RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: You are one to talk.

:eusa_doh: Oh geese.

You still don't know how settler colonialism works.
(COMMENT)

When you see the UN Proponent Agency for Decolonialization (C-24) (A/RES/15/1514 - Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries) list any place in the Middle East (anyplace at all) as subject to decolonization policy (A/RES/15/1514) - you be sure to let me know. Until then, don't pass yourself off as an authority on the subject. It only further penalizes your credibility.

SIGIL PAIR.png
Most Respectfully,
R
They didn't even know in 1960. It takes time to develop a history. Particularly when there is a machine out there peddling deceit 24/7.

Settler colonialism is the proper term. It matches the documented history and the facts on the ground.

Rachel Busbridge on Israel-Palestine and the Settler Colonial ‘Turn’

Correct. Islamic settler colonialism matches the history of the Islamic occupation of the land area of Palestine.
 
OP
P F Tinmore

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
59,893
Reaction score
2,588
Points
1,815
Settler colonialism, Israel, Palestine and white supremacy

 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top