Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

[P F Tinmore]

Prof. Joseph Massad on 'Nation Law: Israeli Apartheid State' at Palestine Expo 2019

 

[P F Tinmore]

Exploring Cultural Activism in Palestine/Israel: Countering Cultural Erasure Through Palestinian Art

 

[toastman]

Tinmore is talking to himself again. Must be off his meds

 

[P F Tinmore]

IsraPalooza Interview with Lucy Aharish

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Music Expo and Cultural Activism | Ep. 9 - Rami Younis | MUSIC XP

 

[P F Tinmore]

Webinar: Liberate Palestine - From the River to the Sea with Khaled Barakat

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
⁜→ P F Tinmore,

Prof. Joseph Massad on 'Nation Law: Israeli Apartheid State' at Palestine Expo 2019

(COMMENT)

It is Internationally (as opposed to "Nationally") recognized that NO country has the right or authority to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. This protects ALL nations, not just the Jewish National Home and Israel. Israel was recognized first as the "Jewish State" in the UN Special Committee on Palestine Recommendation A/RES/181 (II), just the same as the proposed "Arab State" (however rejected by the Arab Higher Committee).

The entire presentation is riddled with inuendos that can be challenged, all coming together to introduce true and exact sounding statements that are used for the support of inexact notions. I think that the entire presentation by Professor Massad is "bogus."


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
⁜→ P F Tinmore,

Prof. Joseph Massad on 'Nation Law: Israeli Apartheid State' at Palestine Expo 2019

(COMMENT)

It is Internationally (as opposed to "Nationally") recognized that NO country has the right or authority to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state. This protects ALL nations, not just the Jewish National Home and Israel. Israel was recognized first as the "Jewish State" in the UN Special Committee on Palestine Recommendation A/RES/181 (II), just the same as the proposed "Arab State" (however rejected by the Arab Higher Committee).

The entire presentation is riddled with inuendos that can be challenged, all coming together to introduce true and exact sounding statements that are used for the support of inexact notions. I think that the entire presentation by Professor Massad is "bogus."


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

It is Internationally (as opposed to "Nationally") recognized that NO country has the right or authority to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.

That's what I have been saying for years.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Coyote]

If you are going to post videos...please post a few words on what they and why they are worth watching.

 

[P F Tinmore]

A panel discussion on the supression of Palestinian free speech on campus.

Federal Crackdown on Campus Palestine Activism

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews
⁜→ P F Tinmore,

And having said that, there are a couple of questions you have to ask about this claim → "Israeli Apartheid State"

​

"The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime;​

SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court​

​

​

Prof. Joseph Massad on 'Nation Law: Israeli Apartheid State' at Palestine Expo 2019

It is Internationally (as opposed to "Nationally") recognized that NO country has the right or authority to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.

That's what I have been saying for years.

(REFERENCES)

◈ boundary/ies The imaginary lines on the surface of the earth which separate the land territory or maritime zones ( continental shelf and EEZ) of one State from that of another. Ideally, as a matter of common sense but little more, a land boundary should be easy to identify and difficult to cross: British Guiana Boundary Case ( 1899 ) 188 C.T.S. 76 ; Alaska Boundary Arbitration ( 1903 ) 15 R.I.A.A. 481. In relation to land boundaries, there is no corpus of law especially for resolving boundary disputes, and recourse is made to the rules for acquiring title to territory in international law (see territory, acquisition of ).

SOURCE: Page 69, Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law​

◈ racial discrimination The International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 21 December 1965 ( 660 U.N.T.S. 195 ), based on the General Assembly Declaration of the same name of 20 November 1963 (Res. 1904 (XVIII)), obliges the States parties ‘to pursue by all appropriate means and without delay a policy of eliminating racial discrimination in all its forms’: art. 2(1). For the purposes of the Convention, racial discrimination is ‘any distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, color, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life’: art. 1(1). The Convention requires ‘equality before the law, notably in the enjoyment of [listed] rights.’

◈ sovereignty ‘Sovereignty as a principle of international law must be sharply distinguished from other related uses of the term: sovereignty in its internal aspects and political sovereignty. Sovereignty in its internal aspects is concerned with the identity of the bearer of supreme authority within a State. This may be an individual or a collective unit. . . . In international relations, the scope of political sovereignty is still less limited [than that within a
State].

(QUESTIONS)

◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, who is being systematically oppressed and dominated?
◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, what one racial group over any other racial group or groups?
◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, with the intention of maintaining that what regime?

(COMMENT)

Generally speaking, the Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RToP) A/HRC/22/NGO/6 11 February 2013, is the list used to outline "Israel’s violations of international law." I consider the Tribunal just one step removed from a Kangaroo Court. It is a travesty for the RToP be given a voice at the UN level; and for the General Assembly to extend recognition and credibility to the RToP.

The RToP claims that • Violation of the prohibition of discrimination based on national origin through Israeli policies and practices akin to Apartheid (2011 Cape Town findings of this Tribunal), which have denied Palestinians a functioning nationality both within Israel proper as well as the Occupied Territory and beyond.

Among other things, the RToP harangues the United States for complicity in Israel’s violations of international law.

Just My Thoughts

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Generally speaking, the Russell Tribunal on Palestine (RToP) A/HRC/22/NGO/6 11 February 2013, is the list used to outline "Israel’s violations of international law." I consider the Tribunal just one step removed from a Kangaroo Court. It is a travesty for the RToP be given a voice at the UN level; and for the General Assembly to extend recognition and credibility to the RToP.

The RToP claims that • Violation of the prohibition of discrimination based on national origin through Israeli policies and practices akin to Apartheid (2011 Cape Town findings of this Tribunal), which have denied Palestinians a functioning nationality both within Israel proper as well as the Occupied Territory and beyond.

What part of this is incorrect?

 

[P F Tinmore]

(QUESTIONS)

◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, who is being systematically oppressed and dominated?
◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, what one racial group over any other racial group or groups?
◈ So, within the boundaries of Israeli Sovereignty, with the intention of maintaining that what regime?

Uhhh, Israel does not have boundaries.

 

[P F Tinmore]

In relation to land boundaries, there is no corpus of law especially for resolving boundary disputes, and recourse is made to the rules for acquiring title to territory in international law (see territory, acquisition of ).

How did Israel acquire title to territory?