Palestinian Sets Himself on Fire Trying to Fire Bomb IDF

Adolf Hitler was a Roman Catholic and he hated Muslims as much as Jews. Don't post bullshit.
From Wikipedia about the Roman Catholi
Adolf Hitler was a Roman Catholic and he hated Muslims as much as Jews. Don't post bullshit.
Better read this, montelatici

Hitler was born to a practising Catholic mother and an anticlerical father, but after leaving home Hitler never again attended Mass or received thesacraments.[358][359][360]Speer states that Hitler made harsh pronouncements against the church to his political associates and though he never officially left it, he had no attachment to it.[361] He adds that Hitler felt that in the absence of the church the faithful would turn to mysticism, which he considered a step backwards.[361] According to Speer, Hitler believed that either Japanese religious beliefs or Islam would have been a more suitable religion for the Germans than Christianity, with its "meekness and flabbiness".[362] Historian John S. Conway states that Hitler was fundamentally opposed to the Christian churches.[363] According to Bullock, Hitler did not believe in God, was anticlerical, and held Christian ethics in contempt because they contravened his preferred view of "survival of the fittest".[364] He favoured aspects of Protestantism that suited his own views, and adopted some elements of the Catholic Church's hierarchical organisation, liturgy, and phraseology in his politics.[365]

Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
But remember -- it's still the fault of da Joos!
That is 100% true...... :thup:
BOOSH replaced da Joos long ago.
 
Freedom fighter attacking the occupation Army with what weapons he has at his disposal. Is there something strange about that? The anti Nazi Partisans all over occupied Europe often blew themselves up trying to attack the German occupation army.

They're Islamist terrorist animals. Freedom fighters fight for freedom, these animals fight to kill Jews and establish an Islamic Caliphate instead of Israel, they are identical to ISIS. So the Jews went from fighting German Nazis to Islamic Nazis.

Palestinian animals are the ones who introduced Arab Islamic Nazism to the world, read all about it here:

Hitler s Mufti Catholic Answers

But Let's at least give you credit for making up that bullshit up about partisans "blowing themselves up". That just shows how far you'll stoop to romanticize a bunch of depraved, terroristic medieval neanderthals who use their own kids as human shields and suicide bombers to kill other kids.
 
WHy is it the rabid jew haters hang out on this board and never post anywhere else?
Because they are mentally ill assholes with diseased minds who live to hate Jews.
 
Adolf Hitler was a Roman Catholic and he hated Muslims as much as Jews. Don't post bullshit.
From Wikipedia about the Roman Catholi
Adolf Hitler was a Roman Catholic and he hated Muslims as much as Jews. Don't post bullshit.
Better read this, montelatici

Hitler was born to a practising Catholic mother and an anticlerical father, but after leaving home Hitler never again attended Mass or received thesacraments.[358][359][360]Speer states that Hitler made harsh pronouncements against the church to his political associates and though he never officially left it, he had no attachment to it.[361] He adds that Hitler felt that in the absence of the church the faithful would turn to mysticism, which he considered a step backwards.[361] According to Speer, Hitler believed that either Japanese religious beliefs or Islam would have been a more suitable religion for the Germans than Christianity, with its "meekness and flabbiness".[362] Historian John S. Conway states that Hitler was fundamentally opposed to the Christian churches.[363] According to Bullock, Hitler did not believe in God, was anticlerical, and held Christian ethics in contempt because they contravened his preferred view of "survival of the fittest".[364] He favoured aspects of Protestantism that suited his own views, and adopted some elements of the Catholic Church's hierarchical organisation, liturgy, and phraseology in his politics.[365]

Adolf Hitler - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

From all the religions in the world, Hitler respected the filth of Islam the most, and wanted Germans to eventually become Muslims. Little does the world know that hitler got his wish with a new breed of Palestinian Muslim Nazis who spread IslamoNazism throughout the Muslim world.

Hitler s Mufti Catholic Answers
 
Hitler and Islam were love at first sight. While hitler was busy committing genocide on the Jews and making plans to destroy Christianity (which he considered an offshoot of Judaism), he was laying out the red carpet for Islam and Muslims:

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".[227]

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"[226] Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe:

Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

— Albert Speer[226]

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying:

'Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.[228]
 
Palestinians and Nazis actually have a lot in common.

Palestinians are definitely the new Nazis.
 
His mother never told him not to play with matches?
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?
 
That's what the Nazis used to say too, Phoney.



DID THEY, were you there to hear them say it. Or have you just made this up like you do with everything else.


Is this one of your big guns Abdul, cos if it is you was robbed
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?
Or Gandhi. Recall how he took up arms against the British and bombed their civilians. Oh, wait.
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?
Or Gandhi. Recall how he took up arms against the British and bombed their civilians. Oh, wait.



And then we had Mandella who murdered more black Africans in a year than the whole of White South Africa did in its lifetime. This is why many black South Africans want a return of aparthied
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?

Did the Jews in Palestine achieve freedom without forcing the British to leave through violence? Why are the leaders of Irgun considered heroic freedom fighters?
 
15th post
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?

Did the Jews in Palestine achieve freedom without forcing the British to leave through violence? Why are the leaders of Irgun considered heroic freedom fighters?



The British left because of arab muslim violence and threats, handing the reins to the UN who had Islamic members voting on the partition plan. Do the math and see how it stacks up against the Jews in 1947, and look at when Britain decided to give up the mandate as to when the bombing of a military headquarters took place ?
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?

Did the Jews in Palestine achieve freedom without forcing the British to leave through violence? Why are the leaders of Irgun considered heroic freedom fighters?
You still didn't answer my questions above, but I hope you will in your next post, about you questions -
The Jews in Palestine achieved freedom by responding to violence - with courage and more violence - when the hostile Arabs - heavily armed and backed by several states slaughtered Jews - the Jews decided to grab the weapons they could manage to get and fight back, you actually think they manufactured weapons under the British Mandate or that they have anywhere to smuggle it from? (except for very generic missile called Davidka in 48, homemade)
Does the Jews forced the British to leave? Funny, eventually the Jews did have a state - something the Palestinians don't.
 
Of course they are fighting for freedom. Violence is the only way to achieve freedom. Without violence, the people with the power have no interest or need to compromise.
Did Martin Luther King achieved freedom by starting violence?
Over 70 years of violence got them somewhere except losing nearly every chance they had?

Did the Jews in Palestine achieve freedom without forcing the British to leave through violence? Why are the leaders of Irgun considered heroic freedom fighters?

Because they fought armies and they didn't target civilians. When was the last time Muslims targeted military? I guess they gave that they got their butts kicked over and over. So now they wear civilian clothing and they using their women and kids as human shields and suicide bombers. Palestinians in general are experts in these crimes against humanity.
 
Back
Top Bottom