RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al
The idea that the Arab Palestinians had a "defensive position" of any sort, is nonsense. They were not defending anything. They were attempting to take sovereignty or territorial control away from those having or holding the title.
IF you are suggesting, in any way, that the Arab Palestinians had any "Right to Armed Struggle" to acquire territory or to achieve some political, economic, military or another objective, goal, or aim, THEN the Arab Palestinians are stepping outside international law.
This is just as true as what these Islamic Resistance Movement criminals know that the international law says: Any person commits an offense by detonating an explosive or incendiary weapon or device that is designed, or has the capability, to cause death, serious bodily injury or substantial material damage has committed an act of terrorism.
And again, the fact that you promote the idea that the Arab Palestinians have the "right" to do this is a violation of the UNSC Resolution 1624 Incitement of Violence (Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts) and the propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law; as well as, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law; IAW Article 20, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR).
BEFORE you and the Arab Palestinians can defense something, it has to be theirs in the first place. The Arab Palestinians (formerly under the managed under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration) was not awarded any territory under the treaty.
You and others claim that the Arab Palestinians are under "occupation" by the Israelis. Whatever the reason you might claim as a people, any Protected persons who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, is subject to prosecution under Article 68 • Section III: Occupied territories • Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV). Again, to suggest it is not, and the Arab Palestinian have some "Right to Armed Struggle" is a violation of the law.
(THE ALTERNATIVE) (In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations and, to this end, shall seek a solution by the means indicated in Article 33, paragraph 1, of the Charter.)
All States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in accordance with the Charter. The principle that States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, is a bedrock fundamental under the Rule of Law.
I know that this is a lot to absorb. I know that you have been told by many propagandists that there is a provision for Armed Struggle, but the fact is, in the case of the Arab Palestinians there is NOT. The must use Chapter VI: Pacific Settlements of Disputes.
I don't think I can make it any more plain or clear. You know the Rule of Law. It is what it is. Those who have advocated for "Armed Struggle and Jihad" not only have forgotten the law, they have forgotten where they put it.
Most Respectfully,
R
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al
The idea that the Arab Palestinians had a "defensive position" of any sort, is nonsense. They were not defending anything. They were attempting to take sovereignty or territorial control away from those having or holding the title.
(COMMENT)OK, so? What does all that have to do with my post?
IF you are suggesting, in any way, that the Arab Palestinians had any "Right to Armed Struggle" to acquire territory or to achieve some political, economic, military or another objective, goal, or aim, THEN the Arab Palestinians are stepping outside international law.
You know that!
This is just as true as what these Islamic Resistance Movement criminals know that the international law says: Any person commits an offense by detonating an explosive or incendiary weapon or device that is designed, or has the capability, to cause death, serious bodily injury or substantial material damage has committed an act of terrorism.
And again, the fact that you promote the idea that the Arab Palestinians have the "right" to do this is a violation of the UNSC Resolution 1624 Incitement of Violence (Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts) and the propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law; as well as, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law; IAW Article 20, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR).
BEFORE you and the Arab Palestinians can defense something, it has to be theirs in the first place. The Arab Palestinians (formerly under the managed under the Occupied Enemy Territory Administration) was not awarded any territory under the treaty.
You and others claim that the Arab Palestinians are under "occupation" by the Israelis. Whatever the reason you might claim as a people, any Protected persons who commit an offense which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, is subject to prosecution under Article 68 • Section III: Occupied territories • Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV). Again, to suggest it is not, and the Arab Palestinian have some "Right to Armed Struggle" is a violation of the law.
(THE ALTERNATIVE) (In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations and, to this end, shall seek a solution by the means indicated in Article 33, paragraph 1, of the Charter.)
All States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in accordance with the Charter. The principle that States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, is a bedrock fundamental under the Rule of Law.
Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States said:Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.
SOURCE: A/RES/25/2625 •
I know that this is a lot to absorb. I know that you have been told by many propagandists that there is a provision for Armed Struggle, but the fact is, in the case of the Arab Palestinians there is NOT. The must use Chapter VI: Pacific Settlements of Disputes.
I don't think I can make it any more plain or clear. You know the Rule of Law. It is what it is. Those who have advocated for "Armed Struggle and Jihad" not only have forgotten the law, they have forgotten where they put it.
Most Respectfully,
R