Mr. Jesus the polls from Christians are finally in. And to be honest with you sir they look REALLY good.
As you can tell Mr. Jesus that allah bullsh#t has just about run its course. Overall sir 58% of Americans want allah to go to hell.
And Mr. Jesus more and more Americans say its WRONG to slight a Christian for being a Christian.
Now in even better news Mr. Jesus. The number of indy voters who hate islam has TRIPLED. And your good "God Bless Them" conservatives have DOUBLED! Sorry to report your spineless sissies in the Democrat party have even DECREASED in numbers of support.
I DO hope you continue to bless and keep Mr. Trump so he can throw these child molesting, raping savages back INTO the hell called the middle east.
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/...ricans-who-are-against-creeping-islamization/
P.S. Please strike the Huffington Post employees with say boils or lice, weasels or whatever you got.
Thank you.
Fury
Then I guess fundy U.S. Christians can stop pretending they're being persecuted now
Dear
TheOldSchool
As long as liberals get to impose THEIR secular beliefs through govt,
while rejecting religious beliefs as "not allowed" by 'separation of church and state'
YES we're going to see people complain of discrimination and persecution.
EX:
A. Why is it okay to impose gay parades and homosexuality as publicly sanctioned events, but not okay to include Christmas trees, nativity scenes, and other references to Christianity? Why is homosexuality as a belief required to be included in order not to discriminate against people of that belief, but Christianity is not?
B. Why is it okay to impose "right to health care through govt"
in order "to save lives". but NOT okay to endorse "right to life" through govt in order 'to save lives". Why is the "freedom of choice" touted in one case, while "free market health care" is PENALIZED in the other.
Clearly the liberals with secular beliefs treat their creeds DIFFERENTLY than the creeds of Christians and Conservatives.
Allowing one belief to be imposed and sanctioned through govt,
while banning another is a form of discrimination by creed.
Of course people are going to complain about the double standard!
This is a lie.
Liberals are not imposing anything on anyone 'through government.'
Liberals correctly understand and acknowledge the Framer's mandate that church and state remain separate, where following settled and accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence consistent with that mandate in no way 'rejects' religious beliefs nor interferes with religious expression.
^ PPBBFFTT ^
Thank you
C_Clayton_Jones
You just prove the point over and over.
Obama declared the "right to health care as the law of the law"
The liberals pushed for "right to marriage" through the courts
to impose on people against their beliefs.
You don't even see your own bias, that's half the problem.
Thank you
C_Clayton_Jones
every time you deny this, you prove the case itself.
Now, I understand you are going by LITERAL religious beliefs,
so you don't count your SECULAR beliefs as religious and that's
how you are getting around this.
From discussions with
JakeStarkey it is clear that the liberals
need it LITERALLY spelled out if POLITICAL/SECULAR beliefs
are going to count as religious beliefs and creeds.
So by your LITERAL interpretation, you are not counting your own
beliefs as creeds, so you don't consider this discriminating against
other people's creeds you DO consider religious and violation of separation of church and state.
Slavery wasn't counted as a violation while the govt endorsed it as part of property laws either, but it is was just as discriminatory and wrongful when it was "legalized" as when it was declared abolished.
Sorry you can't apply that to your own biases.
Clearly you depend on govt, Courts or Congress to spell out
political beliefs and how to treat these equally before you will
acknowledge it. For some reason the liberals need the govt to declare things before they have that choice, or it's not real.
Got it. It's part of your political religion to pass things through Govt before rights are considered real; while conservatives/Constitutionalists believe rights natural exist by human nature, and the govt laws are supposed to REFLECT that reality not create or mandate it.
I'm glad you think this is amusing
C_Clayton_Jones
but actually it's very serious and sad. The reason we have such outraged extremists committing violence is this conflict has not been addressed and resolved, so the fear and oppression leads to disruption.
It is very dangerous not to take this seriously.
I'd rather address this conflict up front, make peace between people coming from different perspectives, and avoid any further violence over abortion issues, guns and govt, policing and immigration, health care welfare and marriage/social benefits, etc.
