PA House Introduces a Resolution: The Election Process Shall Be Declared Improper.

[Deplorable Yankee]

PA house steps in on the fraudulent election process.


In the immediate future, we will be introducing the following resolution:

...

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

www.legis.state.pa.us

I love the gasps from the other day

 

[Mercurialmind]

Look at the anti-American Trump cultists

Trying to overturn the sovereign will of the people and steal an election

wrong again,,,

they are trying to defend against a rigged election,,,

Has the Kraken been released yet? Or should I say...the "Crackpots"?

 

[JimBowie1958]

What a nasty thing to say. You aren't worth gully dust, I see.

He is the shyte upon ones shoe.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Sorry, but the Supreme Court only gets into the picture if the State Courts rule against the Constitution as it's written. So far, they haven't done that. Okay, they have by the copy you have with all the Sharpe changes to your copy but to the US Constitution of America, they have all put it right back to the voters choice. There is nothing there for the Supreme Court to rule on.

In PA the state courts ruled that they can accept mail in ballots for the rest of the week. The law in PA is that all ballots have to be received by 8:00 on Tuesday, the day of the election. This is what's known as judicial legislation; changing the laws on the bench. It's why Al Gore lost that election because the Florida judges did the exact same thing.

In another state some locations allowed for ballot fixing, meaning they corrected the ballots that were not filled out properly. In other locations, they didn't allow it. This violates the Equal Protection Under the Law right. Ballots in a state have to be counted the same way, not favor one area over another.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No they are not. The Appeals Court blasted Trump's legal arguments. They are not fast tracking this to the Supreme Court. Clearly you are delusional. The Supreme Court is not the final decider. Voters are.

Then please explain Bush vs Gore.

 

[busybee01]

It could be they are dismissing these cases to fast track it to the Supreme Court thus helping the President. If they want to try and get this overturned, they don't have very much time to do it. The Supreme Court is the final decider.

Or it could be because they are dismissing the cases because they are full of shit.

State election laws were broken at the behest of election officials in several battleground states, against the wishes of the legislation. That is cause enough to get to the Supreme Court. Add the interference with observers and folks are probably in some trouble.

That has already been debunked by Republican officials. Observers were not interfered with and even the Trump lawyers admitted that was not true. No state election laws were broken. Legislators are not allowed to violate state Constitutions.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It takes more than a history book! Constitutional law, maybe. There is some question about what happens if the House declares a state's electoral votes invalid (and yeah, that could happen, they can do that for two slates in dispute) -- okay, that state's votes don't count. So.............................how many electoral votes are needed NOW? Still 270, or fewer?

This is Democrat constitutional Professor Alan Dershowitz on that subject. It's only a few minute video.

 

[busybee01]

Look at the anti-American Trump cultists

Trying to overturn the sovereign will of the people and steal an election

You are a DemNazi, and a Liar, and will see the wrath of God in your lifetime should you continue to shake your fist at heaven and at God.

Do not think that God is disinterested in elections, especially cheating, lying and stealing in an election. These are massive sins.

When you sin like that against 75 Million People, God is not pleased, and there will be justice done either in this life or at Judgment Day.

Pray that justice comes in this life, so that you repent for on Judgment Day, your fate, and your trip to Hell is sealed.

You have no clue about what God is. You cannot be a Trump supporter and believe in God. God does not give a hoot about elections. Trump is the only candidate for President who has been rebuked by Jesus Christ.

 

[busybee01]

Sorry, but the Supreme Court only gets into the picture if the State Courts rule against the Constitution as it's written. So far, they haven't done that. Okay, they have by the copy you have with all the Sharpe changes to your copy but to the US Constitution of America, they have all put it right back to the voters choice. There is nothing there for the Supreme Court to rule on.

In PA the state courts ruled that they can accept mail in ballots for the rest of the week. The law in PA is that all ballots have to be received by 8:00 on Tuesday, the day of the election. This is what's known as judicial legislation; changing the laws on the bench. It's why Al Gore lost that election because the Florida judges did the exact same thing.

In another state some locations allowed for ballot fixing, meaning they corrected the ballots that were not filled out properly. In other locations, they didn't allow it. This violates the Equal Protection Under the Law right. Ballots in a state have to be counted the same way, not favor one area over another.

You know nothing about the Pennsylvania Constituion yet you continue to display your ignorane. State legislators do not have the right to violate the state constitution. Those ballots that came in the 3 days after the election did not change the results. Trump still lost.

How votes were counted does not fall under the Equal Protection clause. Each local election board has the right to conduct their elections as they see fit. If they had done the same thing, Biden would probably have gotten even more votes. Mail-in voting overwhelmingly favored Biden.

 

[busybee01]

No they are not. The Appeals Court blasted Trump's legal arguments. They are not fast tracking this to the Supreme Court. Clearly you are delusional. The Supreme Court is not the final decider. Voters are.

Then please explain Bush vs Gore.

The court said that Bush v Gore was not a precedent. There were federal deadlines involved.

 

[busybee01]

It takes more than a history book! Constitutional law, maybe. There is some question about what happens if the House declares a state's electoral votes invalid (and yeah, that could happen, they can do that for two slates in dispute) -- okay, that state's votes don't count. So.............................how many electoral votes are needed NOW? Still 270, or fewer?

This is Democrat constitutional Professor Alan Dershowitz on that subject. It's only a few minute video.

You mean TRUMP SUPPORTER Alan Dershowitz.

 

[Faun]

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Democratic Party of the United States —

7. Won the election

8. No amount of whining from the Orange cult will change this fact

I just checked the .gov site and they dont have a winner posted yet,,,

so why are you lying that bejing biden won???

Why lie?

Pennsylvania Elections - Summary Results

www.electionreturns.pa.gov

 

[progressive hunter]

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Democratic Party of the United States —

7. Won the election

8. No amount of whining from the Orange cult will change this fact

I just checked the .gov site and they dont have a winner posted yet,,,

so why are you lying that bejing biden won???

Why lie?

Pennsylvania Elections - Summary Results

www.electionreturns.pa.gov

things change my little retarded friend,,,,

 

[Daryl Hunt]

It could be they are dismissing these cases to fast track it to the Supreme Court thus helping the President. If they want to try and get this overturned, they don't have very much time to do it. The Supreme Court is the final decider.

Or it could be because they are dismissing the cases because they are full of shit.

State election laws were broken at the behest of election officials in several battleground states, against the wishes of the legislation. That is cause enough to get to the Supreme Court. Add the interference with observers and folks are probably in some trouble.

You can't shut the gate after the cows have already run off. None of these things disqualifies the results. What it does is forces the Legislature to fix things for the next election.

But the #1 fix is for the Legislation to get rid of that stupid "You can't count any votes until after the Election", and , "The order that the ballots have to be counted" crap. If the Legislation is unwilling to do that then it's time to get rid of the Legislation.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You mean TRUMP SUPPORTER Alan Dershowitz.

He isn't supporting anybody and said that repeatedly while defending Trump during the phony impeachment.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The court said that Bush v Gore was not a precedent. There were federal deadlines involved.

No, there were state deadlines involved. We don't have any federal deadlines for elections.

 

[Faun]

LOLOL

CCP news.

 

[Faun]

PA house steps in on the fraudulent election process.


In the immediate future, we will be introducing the following resolution:

...

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Pennsylvania House of Representatives—

1. Recognizes substantial irregularities and improprieties associated with mail-in balloting, pre-canvassing, and canvassing during the November 3, 2020 election; and

2. Disapproves of the infringement on the General Assembly’s authority pursuant to the United States Constitution to regulate elections; and

3. Disapproves of and disagrees with the Secretary of the Commonwealth’s premature certification of the results of the November 3, 2020 election regarding presidential electors; and

4. Declares that the selection of presidential electors and other statewide electoral contest results in this Commonwealth is in dispute; and

5. Urges the Secretary of the Commonwealth and the Governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on at the 2020 General Election; and

6. Urges the United States Congress to declare the selection of presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.

House Co-Sponsorship Memoranda

www.legis.state.pa.us

I love the gasps from the other day


View attachment 422487

Those are laughs, not gasps.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Sorry, but the Supreme Court only gets into the picture if the State Courts rule against the Constitution as it's written. So far, they haven't done that. Okay, they have by the copy you have with all the Sharpe changes to your copy but to the US Constitution of America, they have all put it right back to the voters choice. There is nothing there for the Supreme Court to rule on.

In PA the state courts ruled that they can accept mail in ballots for the rest of the week. The law in PA is that all ballots have to be received by 8:00 on Tuesday, the day of the election. This is what's known as judicial legislation; changing the laws on the bench. It's why Al Gore lost that election because the Florida judges did the exact same thing.

In another state some locations allowed for ballot fixing, meaning they corrected the ballots that were not filled out properly. In other locations, they didn't allow it. This violates the Equal Protection Under the Law right. Ballots in a state have to be counted the same way, not favor one area over another.

That was because the State Legislation passed a late bonehead law about when the votes could be counted which would have excluded many mail-in ballots. The System was supposed to fail but due to diligent and hard working Election Officials and Volunteers it didn't fail. And I bet that pisses you off a lot more than some of the mismanagement.

 

[Faun]

THEREFORE, be it RESOLVED that the Democratic Party of the United States —

7. Won the election

8. No amount of whining from the Orange cult will change this fact

I just checked the .gov site and they dont have a winner posted yet,,,

so why are you lying that bejing biden won???

Why lie?

Pennsylvania Elections - Summary Results

www.electionreturns.pa.gov

things change my little retarded friend,,,,

You mean you'll stop lying?