PA House Introduces a Resolution: The Election Process Shall Be Declared Improper.

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but you're not proof.
he didnt recant,,
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
Seen it. People saying the ballots were too neatly folded is not evidence. It’s just, well, it’s nothing.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
Seen it. People saying the ballots were too neatly folded is not evidence. It’s just, well, it’s nothing.
you go ahead and stay focused on that,, just dont get mad when it ends up being a lot more,,,
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
69,014
Reaction score
17,180
Points
2,290
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
Trump knew that mail in voting opens the election up to more fraud. Voting in person, you have to bring an ID with you and prove who you are. Mail in, anybody can send the stupid thing in.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
Trump knew that mail in voting opens the election up to more fraud. Voting in person, you have to bring an ID with you and prove who you are. Mail in, anybody can send the stupid thing in.
even obama knew that mail in was unsafe,,,
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
Seen it. People saying the ballots were too neatly folded is not evidence. It’s just, well, it’s nothing.
you go ahead and stay focused on that,, just dont get mad when it ends up being a lot more,,,
“Ends up”. You guys have a week left.

If the evidence is so strong, makes you wonder why they’re throwing in the “ballots are too nice” argument.

At least, if you’re thinking rationally that is.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
Seen it. People saying the ballots were too neatly folded is not evidence. It’s just, well, it’s nothing.
you go ahead and stay focused on that,, just dont get mad when it ends up being a lot more,,,
“Ends up”. You guys have a week left.

If the evidence is so strong, makes you wonder why they’re throwing in the “ballots are too nice” argument.

At least, if you’re thinking rationally that is.
then why are you so scared???
 

iceberg

Platinum Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
29,894
Reaction score
8,758
Points
490
So. To summarize, the Pennsylvania Republicans want to overturn the election results, which court after court has upheld, through a political process that will allow them to appoint Republican electors, who will then elect Trump.

And you guys are ok with this?
are they following an existing process available to us all or are they making up rules as we go and totally revamping our entire voting process in the matter of a month?
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74,505
Reaction score
14,185
Points
2,210
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but you're not proof.
he didnt recant,,
Liar...

"I didn't specifically overhear the whole story. I just heard a part of it," Hopkins said in the recording. "And I could have missed a lot of it."

"My mind probably added the rest. I understand that," he said at another point, adding: "All it is is hearsay, and that's the worst part."

When an agent asked Hopkins in the recording if he would still swear to the affidavit's claim that the postmaster "was back-dating ballots," he replied: "At this point? No."


 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
69,014
Reaction score
17,180
Points
2,290
even obama knew that mail in was unsafe,,,
I think at this point we need to eliminate mail in voting with the exception for those who cannot physically vote. We also need to eliminate technology at this point. Every place gets hand counted and each ballot needs to be examined by a member from each party. It will take much longer, but it also gives everybody assurance the election was not rigged.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: DBA

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
Trump knew that mail in voting opens the election up to more fraud. Voting in person, you have to bring an ID with you and prove who you are. Mail in, anybody can send the stupid thing in.
I’ve never brought an ID. Trump votes by mail.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
26,328
Reaction score
11,823
Points
950
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but you're not proof.
he didnt recant,,
Liar...

"I didn't specifically overhear the whole story. I just heard a part of it," Hopkins said in the recording. "And I could have missed a lot of it."
"My mind probably added the rest. I understand that," he said at another point, adding: "All it is is hearsay, and that's the worst part."
When an agent asked Hopkins in the recording if he would still swear to the affidavit's claim that the postmaster "was back-dating ballots," he replied: "At this point? No."
thanks for your edited version of events,,,
 

iceberg

Platinum Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
29,894
Reaction score
8,758
Points
490
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???
They havent. And the courts have REPEATEDLY thrown out their cases.

Legitimate recounts have been done, but what the Republicans are trying to do is run out the clock for certifying, so their legislatures can pick Republucan electors to appoint Trump, against the will of the people.

Are you really ok with this?
get pretty tired of this "will of the people" when neither extreme viewpoint seems to give a damn about "the will of the people" - it's simply a phrase they use to try and gain sympathy for THEIR viewpoint.

this is not a legitimate election. the entire mail out ballot scenario were never tested, never secured, and so on. your assuming all is well. how come you're OK with totally redoing our voting process in favor of YOUR candidate yet suddenly are worried about THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,775
Reaction score
7,266
Points
265
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
didnt you say trump lies about everything??
He lies quite frequently.

Like when he claimed to have evidence of fraud.
theres a lot of evidence,,, you should open your eyes and see it,,
Seen it. People saying the ballots were too neatly folded is not evidence. It’s just, well, it’s nothing.
you go ahead and stay focused on that,, just dont get mad when it ends up being a lot more,,,
“Ends up”. You guys have a week left.

If the evidence is so strong, makes you wonder why they’re throwing in the “ballots are too nice” argument.

At least, if you’re thinking rationally that is.
then why are you so scared???
Because you guys seem to want to skip right over proving the allegations and go directly to throwing out the results.
 

iceberg

Platinum Member
Joined
May 15, 2017
Messages
29,894
Reaction score
8,758
Points
490
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,
Trump himself declared that an election loss would equate to fraud.

He declared that before any votes were counted.

And so it’s unsurprising that when he loses, y’all are saying it’s a fraud. But it’s not based on facts because you can’t declare fraud before it happens.
and hillary said never give up under any circumstances. yet you are ignoring that one and harping on trumps verbiage.

this is why you are a one sided troll.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top