PA House Introduces a Resolution: The Election Process Shall Be Declared Improper.

Daryl Hunt

Your Worst Nightmare
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
22,607
Reaction score
4,586
Points
290
Location
O.D. (Stands for Out Dere
Actually, Trump admitted it was going to be hard to get the Supreme Court to even hear the case.

There's zero indication that the Supreme Court is interested in hearing any of Trump's appeals since the election. And even less indication that they will somehow overturn the election results and give Trump the election.

Its a right wing fantasy....used as a balm to soothe the nearly endless streak of stark legal failures by the Trump legal team.
I agree. It will be a tough time to get the SC to hear any of his claims, but it's certainly worth a shot. After all, there are so many inconsistencies in this election.
And almost all of them have come from the Rump camp. Don't expect the rest of us to make allowances for Rump and YOUR incompetence. The Election is over. Own it. Take that walk of shame like I did inside the 2 years of Rumps reign of terror.

 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
89,820
Reaction score
22,179
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Again, what do you expect from SCOTUS? Do you expect them to throw out each and every slower court ruling? To date, the District Courts have upheld the lower courts due to lack of......well....... everything. The Friday Ruling means that PA can and will certify the vote. That suit was a huge hail mary with absolutely no chance. And Rudy looked like a complete baffoon. The RNC needs to get competent legal representation and Rudy ain't it. It's going fast because Rudy is incompetent from the word go. No wonder the competent legal firms ran screaming from the building.
The SC is the ultimate decider, just like it was in the Bush/ Gore election. In civil suits, you ask the court to allow you to find evidence of your claim. After all, counties and state control their own election system, so it's nearly impossible to find that without a court order or the states cooperation. The lower courts denied the Trump team the ability to do just that. The next step is to present the Supreme Court with circumstantial evidence for them to rule on in depth research.

Whether that will happen or not is anybody's guess. Even President Trump admitted it's a tough call because the SC doesn't have to hear any case at all. If they don't and if Biden does keep his win, there will always be a question mark next to his name as one of our Presidents in this country.
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
68,790
Reaction score
17,035
Points
2,290
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
89,820
Reaction score
22,179
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This one is legitimate as court case after court case has proven.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
68,790
Reaction score
17,035
Points
2,290
And almost all of them have come from the Rump camp. Don't expect the rest of us to make allowances for Rump and YOUR incompetence. The Election is over. Own it. Take that walk of shame like I did inside the 2 years of Rumps reign of terror.
The only people that need to take the walk of shame are the people that voted for this incompetent dementia man for President. Unless we can hold the Senate, you are going to see destruction to this country you've never seen before, and I will be here every single day to remind TDS people what they did to this country.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,337
Reaction score
7,100
Points
265
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
Just stop. The election was legitimate. You just don’t like the outcome.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
68,790
Reaction score
17,035
Points
2,290
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
89,820
Reaction score
22,179
Points
2,180
Location
in between
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.
 

colfax_m

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
22,337
Reaction score
7,100
Points
265
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.
 

Dragonlady

Designing Woman
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
28,636
Reaction score
10,759
Points
910
Location
Niagara Escarpment
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
25,760
Reaction score
11,446
Points
950
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
68,790
Reaction score
17,035
Points
2,290
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
Which is a total lie. Opening up the system to additional fraud makes it less legitimate--not more.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
68,790
Reaction score
17,035
Points
2,290
He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.
We'll find out because the real court is the Supreme Court.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
89,820
Reaction score
22,179
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???
They havent. And the courts have REPEATEDLY thrown out their cases.

Legitimate recounts have been done, but what the Republicans are trying to do is run out the clock for certifying, so their legislatures can pick Republucan electors to appoint Trump, against the will of the people.

Are you really ok with this?
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
89,820
Reaction score
22,179
Points
2,180
Location
in between
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
Which is a total lie. Opening up the system to additional fraud makes it less legitimate--not more.
There is no evidence greater fraud occurred, per the courts.
 

progressive hunter

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
25,760
Reaction score
11,446
Points
950
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?

(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.

Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???
They havent. And the courts have REPEATEDLY thrown out their cases.

Legitimate recounts have been done, but what the Republicans are trying to do is run out the clock for certifying, so their legislatures can pick Republucan electors to appoint Trump, against the will of the people.

Are you really ok with this?
I'm OK with stopping the dem cheat machine in its tracks,,,

if youre not OK with it I suggest you tell the dem party to not cheat,,,
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74,168
Reaction score
14,026
Points
2,210
When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.

Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.
Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but they're not proof.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top