And almost all of them have come from the Rump camp. Don't expect the rest of us to make allowances for Rump and YOUR incompetence. The Election is over. Own it. Take that walk of shame like I did inside the 2 years of Rumps reign of terror.I agree. It will be a tough time to get the SC to hear any of his claims, but it's certainly worth a shot. After all, there are so many inconsistencies in this election.Actually, Trump admitted it was going to be hard to get the Supreme Court to even hear the case.
There's zero indication that the Supreme Court is interested in hearing any of Trump's appeals since the election. And even less indication that they will somehow overturn the election results and give Trump the election.
Its a right wing fantasy....used as a balm to soothe the nearly endless streak of stark legal failures by the Trump legal team.
Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?The SC is the ultimate decider, just like it was in the Bush/ Gore election. In civil suits, you ask the court to allow you to find evidence of your claim. After all, counties and state control their own election system, so it's nearly impossible to find that without a court order or the states cooperation. The lower courts denied the Trump team the ability to do just that. The next step is to present the Supreme Court with circumstantial evidence for them to rule on in depth research.Again, what do you expect from SCOTUS? Do you expect them to throw out each and every slower court ruling? To date, the District Courts have upheld the lower courts due to lack of......well....... everything. The Friday Ruling means that PA can and will certify the vote. That suit was a huge hail mary with absolutely no chance. And Rudy looked like a complete baffoon. The RNC needs to get competent legal representation and Rudy ain't it. It's going fast because Rudy is incompetent from the word go. No wonder the competent legal firms ran screaming from the building.
Whether that will happen or not is anybody's guess. Even President Trump admitted it's a tough call because the SC doesn't have to hear any case at all. If they don't and if Biden does keep his win, there will always be a question mark next to his name as one of our Presidents in this country.
That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
This one is legitimate as court case after court case has proven.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
The only people that need to take the walk of shame are the people that voted for this incompetent dementia man for President. Unless we can hold the Senate, you are going to see destruction to this country you've never seen before, and I will be here every single day to remind TDS people what they did to this country.And almost all of them have come from the Rump camp. Don't expect the rest of us to make allowances for Rump and YOUR incompetence. The Election is over. Own it. Take that walk of shame like I did inside the 2 years of Rumps reign of terror.
Just stop. The election was legitimate. You just don’t like the outcome.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.
Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.
Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.
Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
Which is a total lie. Opening up the system to additional fraud makes it less legitimate--not more.This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
We'll find out because the real court is the Supreme Court.He did not demonstrate fraud. in fact he had to back down before a judge. He cant prove it before a judge in a real court, so he is going for the court of public opinion.
They havent. And the courts have REPEATEDLY thrown out their cases.if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
There is no evidence greater fraud occurred, per the courts.Which is a total lie. Opening up the system to additional fraud makes it less legitimate--not more.This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.
I'm OK with stopping the dem cheat machine in its tracks,,,They havent. And the courts have REPEATEDLY thrown out their cases.if thats true then why are dems so scared and trying to stop any audit???This is the MOST legitimate election this century. Because of Trump's threats of law suits, the states went out of their way to ensure that there were no shennanigans this time. And let's face it. In recent years, it's the Republicans who have consistently cheated, and supressed the vote.That's because they were legitimate elections. This one not so much. You had states that sent out ballots to people who wanted them or not. Anybody could have filled them out including the mailman. A lot of places didn't check signatures, or set their signature computer software to under 50% sensitivity.Ya right. Like the question mark after Trump's name?
(though unlike you guys I happen to think both, as well as Obama and Bush were legitimately elected.)
Bottom line is if we had a normal election, Biden wouldn't have come close because mail in voting invites much more fraud.
Legitimate recounts have been done, but what the Republicans are trying to do is run out the clock for certifying, so their legislatures can pick Republucan electors to appoint Trump, against the will of the people.
Are you really ok with this?
Trump wasn’t cheated. He just lost.I'm OK with stopping the dem cheat machine in its tracks,,,
Like the one from the USPS who recanted his sworn affidavit the moment it colided with scrutiny? Those affidavits may be evidence but they're not proof.He demonstrated the fraud. They have over 250 signed affidavits (some from actual poll workers) of fraud they witnessed. He showed how one county got 1,800 absentee ballot requests, and 2,500 were returned. Instances of people going to the poll only to be denied their right to vote because somebody filled out a mail in ballot in their name and sent it in.When asked for Evidence, Rudy didn't have a single one. So don't blame it on the courts. Blame it on the Party of the Rump 3 ring Circus. And it's not a tough call on the SC, the lower courts have done exactly what they should be doing and that leaves nothing for the SC to rule on.
Now, get ready for that walk of shame that some of us did over 2 years ago.
thanks for your opinion but I will stick with the facts,,,Trump wasn’t cheated. He just lost.I'm OK with stopping the dem cheat machine in its tracks,,,
